Tuesday, April 12, 2011

9-11 - A date awaited by the Rabbinate for the past 400 years?

The following diatribe is from a Christian Zionist site at http://www.etpv.org/2001/gosea.html

In it, the writers, who appear to be Dispensationalist in their outlook, mention that Rabbis in Israel have been awaiting the date of 9-11 for the past 400 years.  The date of 9-11-1999 (Rosh Hashanah) began the period of the "Judgement of Nations", whic culminated in the September 11th, 2001 attack.  Other dates, covering events such as the death of Syria's Assad and the Camp David Accords are also mentioned, which should interest anyone who has been keeping track of the odd "coincidental" dates that seem to accompany recent disasters and other significant world events.  

September 11 of the Year One in the Jewish calendar is the birth date of Adam.

The 6000th anniversary of Adam's creation is September 11, 1999.  

The following is a long essay, so for those who wish to skim, the more interesting passages are in boldface.
 -----------------------------------------------------------------------
God's Seasons
Nancy White - Billye Brim


EXCERPTED FROM NANCY WHITE'S INP-TEAM NEWSLETTER:

"Two Days--And Watching the Moeds (God's Appointed Times)" By Billye Brim (copied from The Glory Watch, Autumn 2001.)


THE SIGNIFICANCE OF SEPTEMBER 11, 1999--SEPTEMBER 11, 2001 --JUDGMENT OF NATIONS BEGINS.


A long anticipated prophetic time period began on Rosh Hashanah, September 11, 1999. Since then, God's moeds are fast ticking off one by one, right on schedule.

WHAT IS A MOED?

The first mention of this Hebrew word is in:

Genesis 1:14 "And God said, 'Let there be lights in the firmament of the heaven to divide the day from the night; and let them be for signs, and for seasons (moedim or moeds), and for days, and years."

(The sun, moon, planets, & stars are for signs & seasons, days & years of the appointed times.)

Moed means: "appointed time, fixed time; appointed place or meeting."

God is an eternal being not limited by time. But for His redemptive dealings with man, He cut out a portion of Eternity, so to speak, and called it Time. Time's end was predetermined from its beginning. Time is marked with moeds--God's foreordained appointments.

Leviticus 23:2, 4 "Speak unto the children of Israel, and say unto them, 'The moeds of the LORD, which you shall proclaim holy convocations, these my moeds...

"These are the moeds of the LORD, holy convocations, which you shall proclaim in their moeds (appointed times)'."

You may want to read Leviticus 23 and mark your Bible where it is used so you can realize the impact of how God was designating appointed times--fixed dates one can circle on a calendar--in His great redemptive plan.

Passover (Pesach), Pentecost (Shavuot), and Tabernacles (Succot) are marked out in Leviticus 23. We already have seen how Passover & Pentecost have known great redemptive fulfillment (through the life of Jesus).

Tabernacles is yet to be revealed to the world at large when the nations will be required to worship the king through the celebration of the Feast of Tabernacles at Jerusalem. (Zechariah 14:16 & 17.)

God is a sign-giving God. But one has to know how to read His signs--how to watch His calendar. How to watch moeds prophesied throughout the word of God. How to watch date patterns in the history of Israel.

God's signature often appears in an event in relation to the DATE of the happening.

For instance, the Berlin Wall fell on November 9, 1989. On November 9, 1938, Hitler's government broke the windows of almost every German synagogue and viciously beat any Jews who tried to protect their sanctuaries. Kristallnacht, the night of the broken glass, tested how the world would react and fueled the progression of the horror of the Holocaust.

Communism reared its ugly head of power on the back of Lenin's so-called "October Revolution". But it was only an October revolution by the Julian, or Old Style, calendar that was used in Russia.

In 1918, the Soviet government adopted the Gregorian or New Style calendar. Therefore the dates of the revolution, October 24 - 25, 1917 translate to November 5 - 6, 1917. The Soviet government annually celebrated communism's triumph on the November dates.

(Note: Under Russia's President Putin, November 2000, they have returned to the celebration of the old communist dates. Putin said this was to honor their forefathers, or else their lives would have been lived in vain.)

So--near the 50th anniversary of Kristallnacht, and the 70th anniversary of Communism, a judgment fell, not at the hands of an army or of an earthly super-power, but at the hand of God. (The Berlin wall fell at the appointed time.)

THE DAY EVERYTHING CHANGED


For some time before the day arrived, I heard biblical scholars and Jews talking about the importance of Rosh Hashanah, September 11, 1999.

Rosh Hashanah is literally translated Head of the Year, and is the beginning of the civil new year as marked on God's calendar in Leviticus 23:24 and Numbers 29:1.

Numbers 29:1 "And in the seventh month, on the first day of the month, you shall have a holy convocation. You shall do no customary work. For you it is a day of blowing the trumpets..."

(The Hebrew calendar is not like ours, so the seventh month would be in September. Blowing the trumpets, known as the Feast of Trumpets, is a 9-11 call to alert the people to prepare their hearts for Yom Kippur, the Day of Atonement for the nation, a day of national repentance.)

Early in 1999, the Lord spoke to me and said, "Something is going to happen in Israel in September. And I want you to be there."

It was September 9, 1999, that we learned about the property in Migdal. Just a few days later, Lynne Hammond, Walter & Lucy McKee, and I took off for Israel to see the hotel on the Sea of Galilee and to pray about whether it was God's will and His purpose for us to acquire it.

On that trip we visited Torah scholars in Jerusalem and asked them about Rosh Hashanah, September 11, 1999. Why all the talk about it?


Jewish scholars from various groups gave us the same answer. Their eyes lit up as they told us the sages had been waiting for this day for 400 years!


SEPTEMBER 11, 1999--THE YEAR THAT EVERYTHING CHANGES-- BEGINNING OF THE JUDGMENT OF THE NATIONS

"What does it mean?" I asked. They told us that it marks the beginning of "the year that everything changes". That it marks the time of the beginning (of the conclusion) of the "judgment of the nations".

The next summer on June 10, 2000 as I stood preaching, someone handed me a note. It said that Hafaz al Assad, the ruler of Syria, had just dropped dead during a telephone conversation with the president of Lebanon.

I thought of Assad's hatred for Israel and his driving ambition to regain the Golan. I thought of how Prime Minister Barak and the world were beating a path to Assad's door to try to make a deal on the Golan.

But most of all, I thought of what the Jewish scholar said about the judgment of the nations. Later, I realized that Assad died on Pentecost, (Shavuot)--and, perhaps, even more telling--on the 33rd anniversary of the day that he lost the Golan to Israel in the Six-Day War of 1967.

So--the next time I was in Israel, I went to one of my Jewish sources, (those involved in rebuilding the Temple), and asked, "Do you think Assad's death on such a date (one of God's moeds) had to do with the judgment of the nations?"


He gestured in the affirmative with an action of his head and hand that I have observed only among the Jews.

END OF THE 2 DAYS--(2000 YEARS)-- OF THE DIASPORA

He verbally answered my question with a question, "What do you think about the 2 days ending on the day the Camp David II accords fell apart?"

"What!" I exclaimed. "The two days ended? When? How can you tell?"

You see I had been preaching about the 2 days of Hosea chapters 5 & 6 for almost 15 years. I knew they were 2000 years in length and we were generally at the end of the time-frame. But every time I preached it, I knew I had no idea exactly when they began, and when they would end.
Briefly, to catch you up on the teaching...

(scriptures added so you can see the context)

HOSEA'S PROPHESY OF THE SCATTERING

Hosea 5:1-3, 14-15 "Hear this O priests! Take heed O house of Israel! Give ear, O house of the king! For yours is the judgment, because you have been a snare to Mizpah, and a net spread on Tabor.

"The revolters are deeply involved in slaughter (sacrifice of the innocents). Though I rebuke them all, I know Ephraim, and Israel is not hidden from Me; For now, O Ephraim, you commit harlotry. Israel is defiled."

"For I will be like a lion to Ephraim, and like a young lion to the house of Judah. I, even, I, will tear them (like a lion tearing them) and go away; I will take them away, and no one will rescue them.

"I will return again to My place till they acknowledge their offense. Then they will seek my face; In their affliction, they will earnestly seek Me."

REVIVAL AT END OF THE 2ND DAY--BEGINNING OF THE 3RD DAY:

Hosea 6:1-2 "Come, and let us return to the LORD; For He has torn, but He will heal us; He has stricken, but He will bind us up. After 2 days, He will revive us. On the 3rd day, He will raise us up, That we may live in His sight.

"Let us know, Let us pursue the knowledge of the LORD, His going forth is established as the morning; He will come to us like the rain, Like the latter and former rain to the earth."

THE TWO DAYS IN THE NEW TESTAMENT

Peter, the Apostle to the circumcised (Jews), wrote two letters to believers among the Jewish Diaspora (I Peter 1:1. II Peter 3:1)

Peter reveals that a period of time will elapse between his departure and the coming of the Lord, a long time during which false prophets will appear. Peter points to the prophetic books of the Hebrew Scripture to know the time of the fulfillment of the promises (1:19-21; 3:2)

KEY TO UNLOCKING THE TIME FRAME OF THIS PROPHECY:

He then points out the KEY to unlocking the timing of the prophecies:

II Peter 3:8 "But, beloved, be not ignorant of this one thing, that one day is with the Lord as a thousand years, and a thousand years as one day."

The Jewish believers knew which prophets that Peter was referring to, and that the prophets spoke of the days in relation to the length of the Diaspora. They knew immediately that it was a reference to the Prophet Hosea.

(Jesus and all the prophets set the Ingathering of the Diaspora as the key to the timing of the setting up of the millennial kingdom.)

I have since learned that Hosea was one of the most relied upon prophets as the Jews looked to know the TIME of the Messianic redemption.

In Hosea 4, 5, and 6, God deals with the sins and the resulting punishment-- the scattering-- or as translated into Greek, the Diaspora of His people.

Deuteronomy 28:64 prophesied that the scattering would be "from one end of the earth even unto the other."

The prophets warned of the scattering long before it occurred. But with every warning of the scattering, the Diaspora, there was a promise of an Ingathering before the coming of the Messianic Kingdom.

Hosea gave a picture of inescapable punishment.

Hosea 4:17: "Ephraim is joined to idols; let him alone."

In some ways, Ephraim is still joined to idols--but things will be sorted out soon, as the nations are judged for their idolatry and their jealousies are purified by fire. A righteous remnant is among them.

GOD SCATTERS BOTH HOUSES IN THE DIASPORA

Hosea shows that both houses would fall-- the house of Israel as well as the house of Judah.

Hosea 5:5 "The pride of Israel testifies to his face. Therefore, Israel & Ephraim stumble in their iniquity; Judah also stumbles with them. With their flocks & herds, they shall go to seek the LORD, but they will not find Him; He has withdrawn Himself from them."

THOUGH GOD SCATTERED, HE PROMISED THEIR RESTORATION

(Hosea 5:14-15 and Hosea 6:1-3. Scriptures previously quoted in this article, follow in this sequence.

Because God withdrew from them, He tore them in pieces like a lion for their abominations and left them to be scattered till their punishment was fulfilled. Then he promised to raise them up after 2 days (2000 years).

On the 3rd Day, the Millennial reign, He promised to raise them up to live in His sight as a mighty restored nation.)

Ephraim was shredded till he was not easily identifiable, but Judah though torn, kept the earmark of the Sabbath. Therefore, everyone identified the Jews, the southern house as Israel, forgetting that Ephraim was the northern house.

So--I had preached all of this. But I did not know how to determine the end of the 2 days--until that day when the Jewish scholar asked me, "What do you think of the 2 days ending on the exact day the Camp David II accords fell apart?"

CAMP DAVID II AND THE FASTS OF TAMUZ AND AV

US President Bill Clinton convened a Middle East summit at Camp David in Maryland in July 2000. Israeli Prime Minister Barak, Yasser Arafat, and Clinton arrived on July 11 and talks to salvage the ill-advised --for they were opposite to the revealed will of God in the Scriptures--Oslo accords began.

On July 20, however, President Clinton's spokesman announced, "The summit has come to a conclusion without reaching an agreement."


July 20, 2000 on the Jewish calendar was the 17th of Tamuz--or as it is known "the fast of Tamuz".

WHAT IS THE FAST OF TAMMUZ?

(Note: There is a counterfeit "fast" to every God appointed fast. When Israel sinned by putting idols dedicated to devils into the Temple, the fast of Tammuz evolved. Jewish women wept for Tammuz--a pagan practice.

No wonder destruction followed them through the centuries during the "fast of Tammuz". Instead of calling upon Jehovah, they were worshipping the Queen of Heaven and her son, the counterfeit savior, Tammuz. This dates back to the idolatrous religion of Egypt.

During this time, the temple of God became a temple to idols. The Jewish priests began to worship the sun and faced toward the east.

Since the Jews began this practice in God's Holy Temple--is it any wonder that today, the men of Islam worship toward the rising of the sun on this very spot where the Jews allowed the pure worship of God to degenerate into idolatry? Legal ground was given to devils at that time, and they still inhabit the Temple Mount, though that spot belongs to Jehovah, and His Shekinah Glory is also there. It can be seen at the Wailing Wall.

Ezekiel 8:14-16 (Ezekiel's vision of the desecration of the Temple)

"Then He brought me to the door of the gate of the Lord's house which was toward the north: and behold, to my dismay, there sat women weeping for Tammuz. Then He said to me: 'Have you seen this, O son of man? Turn again, and you will see greater abominations than these.

"So He brought me into the inner court of the Lord's house; and there, at the door of the temple of the LORD, between the porch and the altar, were about 25 men with their backs toward the temple of the LORD, and their faces were toward the east, and they were worshipping the sun toward the east."

So the "fast of Tamuz" was a heathen practice, and as long as Israel keeps this fast, destruction will continue to plague them. Surely God has something better, as we shall see, through His appointed moeds.

Ramadan, the Muslim fast in November is another example of this. Fasting or observing a "holiday" empowers the spirits of the god you worship to inhabit you. Ramadan lasts an entire month, and it culminates in a "day of destiny" when special powers or visions are imparted.

Another example is Christmas. Christians honor the birth of Jesus and that is good. Pagan practices enter in, however, if we are not alert to the history of this day. Every Holy Day of Jehovah has a pagan counterfeit. In paganism, babies are sacrificed on Christmas, to mock the birth of the Savior.

We must ask ourselves, "Do we worship Jesus, or the spirit of "Christmas?' If we worship "Christmas" instead of the Savior, a spirit of greed and competition enters. A time that should be joyful becomes a worrisome time of rush and feeling like we have to give and get expensive gifts or we have failed.

This Christmas, Let's keep our eyes on God's gift, Jesus, and not let our joy be stolen. God loves a cheerful giver--if we are unable to give cheerfully, we might as well not give. Refuse to be condemned or controlled by the world's spirit of Christmas, which is not the freedom of the Holy Spirit.

It is interesting that November begins with Halloween, the end of October. Halloween is the "birthday of Satan". To celebrate Halloween is to give demons legal ground into your soul & your family. The first 2 weeks of November are high days of Satanic activity. Is it a coincidence that Ramadan begins during this time period?

God's true MOEDS-- Passover, Pentecost, & Tabernacles--must be re-instated fully by Christians & the Jewish people.

The history of other fast days (holidays), not given to Moses, need to be re-examined by both Christians & Jews.

Jesus was in the temple during the "Feast of Lights" (Hannukah). It is not wrong to celebrate these days if our hearts are pure, and we realize the true significance of the holiday, and we worship the true God.

We have just celebrated Thanksgiving, the time to be thankful for God's blessings. In a history book that I read about, secularist historians wrote that the Pilgrims gave thanks to the Indians (not to God) for saving them from starvation. There is an active element in our society that tries to take the glory from Jehovah, stripping all references to God out of our educational system.

Satan has a counterfeit for all of God's Moeds--appointed times --given as signs through the sun, moon, & stars. --End of Note.)

(Back to Billye Brim's article.)

FAST OF AV--TISHA B'AV

I also want to point out here that August 10, 2000 was the 9th of Av on the Jewish calendar--also known as the Fast of Av, or Tisha b'Av.

For many years, the Jews have fasted--not feasted--on these 2 dates: Fast of Tammuz & Tisha b'Av, because of their biblical and historical significance. They have fasted in mourning.

(Note: If God's true Moeds--appointed times: Passover, Pentecost, Tabernacles are observed--who needs these other fast days?

It is okay to remember the days of past destruction. But without coming to God in true repentance and acknowledging his true moeds--all these other fastings are in vain and in fact, they compound the problem, because they give honor to the god of destruction, not the God who brings salvation.

Zechariah 8 mentions both fasts --fast of Tamuz & fast of Tisha B'av.

On precisely the same date, the 9th of Av, both the First and the Second Temples were destroyed. On that same date, other tragic events have befallen the Jews: In 1290, they were expelled from England; in 1492, they were expelled from Spain, in 1914, Archduke Ferdinand was shot leading to WWI and WWII with its atrocities.

The first recorded biblical happening on the 9th of Av was when the Jews received the report of the 10 spies at Kadesh Barnea and they refused to possess the Promised Land. (Numbers 13). The rabbis teach that their lack of faith resulted in the subsequent tragedies on that date.

As to the 17th of Tamuz, Babylon and Rome besieged Jerusalem and breached the walls on the 17th of Tamuz. The first biblical occurrence on the 17th of Tamuz was when Moses saw the golden calf and smashed the tablets on which God wrote the Ten Commandments.

(Note: this first occurrence of 17th of Tammuz was a celebration of idolatry by the Israelites, a throw-back to the gods of Egypt. It angered Moses to the point of dashing the 10 commandments of stone.)

The Torah scholar (my Jewish source) said to me, "The talks fell apart on exactly the date the 2 days ended."

"How do you figure that?" I asked.

"It's easy." And again he answered me with a question. "How long has it been since the Second Temple was destroyed?"

I knew Titus the Roman destroyed it in 70 AD Doing a little subtraction, taking 70 from 2000, I answered, "It has been 1930 years."

"Right," he replied. "And how long were we without a Temple in the Babylonian captivity?"

"Seventy years," I said.

"Right, now add it together."


This time I added the 70 years after the Babylonian destruction and scattering, to the 1930 years since the Roman destruction and scattering. "2000!" I exclaimed.

"That's right." he replied. "Two Days."

Another long-awaited moed was fulfilled and recorded right before the world's eyes through the cameras and print of the media.

(July 20, 2000, President Clinton of the USA, Arafat of Palestinian Authority, & Barak of Israel. No agreement to salvage the peace Oslo accords could be made--the 2000 years were up. Even though the nations try to keep Israel from its destiny--they will not be able.)
(end of article by Billye Brim) 


SUMMARY OF FACTS ABOUT SEPTEMBER 11TH:


It is interesting that September 11, 1999, Rosh Hashanah, had been anticipated by rabbis who studied the scriptures, for 400 years. This date marked the beginning of the judgment of the nations.

Billye Brim who had gone to Israel to buy the hotel on the mountain of Migdal, visited with Ariel Sharon during those days in September, 1999, and he read Ezekiel 36 in her presence. He said "This is being fulfilled this day."

Ezekiel 36:1 "And you, son of man, prophesy to the mountains of Israel."--

This passage is too long to print here but every serious student should read it. God says because the mountains of Israel have been claimed by the nations of the world and Israel has been slandered, that Israel is to prophesy to the mountains, and God will reap judgment on the nations who have falsely claimed Israel's territory.

There is a condition here--The prophets must prophesy to the mountains in order for God to reap the judgment on their enemies. God said he would not vindicate them because of their goodness, but to vindicate His Name.

Ezekiel 36:22 "Therefore say to the house of Israel, 'Thus says the Lord God: 'I do not do this for your sake, O house of Israel, BUT FOR MY HOLY NAME'S SAKE, which you have profaned among the nations wherever you went."

Ariel Sharon is a man of the book, and God led him to read this portion of scripture to Billye Brim who was in the process of buying a mountain in Israel to give back to Israel as God's Prayer Mountain in the Galilee! The moed date, was either September 11 or September 13, 1999.

September 11-13, 2000 marked the beginning of the current intifada in Israel. The uprising had already been planned by the Palestinians, but they started it officially when Ariel Sharon visited the Temple Mount. The PA conveniently blamed it on his visit. This date is significant--it was one year from the date that Ariel Sharon and Billye Brim read this passage and prophesied to the mountains.

September 11, 2001, brought America into the picture more solidly, by giving America a wake-up call. America has a chance to shine as never before. We must defend the mountains of Israel and quit giving them away. We must pray for our leaders to stay in the right lane, so that our nation remains a sheep nation. Satan's plan is to make us a goat nation.

Our leaders are supporting the establishment of a Palestinian state--which is well & good ONLY if the Palestinians would leave Israel alone. However, the mindset of Islam, the Arab nations, and Arafat and his followers is to totally annihilate Israel. The planned Palestinian state would engulf Israel and strangle her, except for divine intervention.


America will be judged severely by God for dividing the land and giving it to the enemies of Israel, if this situation is not turned around. Let's continue to press into prayer for our leaders that they will be in the center of God's perfect will, which is for them to stand strong in behalf of Israel.

PRAY OUR LEADERS STAY CLOSE TO GOD

Proverbs 21:1 "The king's heart is in the hand of the Lord; like rivers of water; He turns it wherever He wishes."

The demise of Mt. Seir or Edom is promised in Ezekiel 35. Edomites are the descendents of Esau, Jacob's twin brother. They have hated Israel all these years. God promises to destroy them because they have not repented of their hatred and that they continue to shed the blood of Israel even after "their (Israel's) iniquity came to an end".

Ezekiel 35:5 speaks about the END of Israel's iniquity, which is the end of the Diaspora, the end of the 2 days of being scattered.

So let us all read Ezekiel 36 and begin prophesying to the mountains of Israel: "O mountains of Israel, Hear the Word of the Lord...." Godly Jews have this chapter memorized, and they do prophesy to the mountains.

This prophesying can bring judgment on America---but we all know that 9-11 was a wake-up call for major repentance. God does not want to destroy America--He wants us to repent and stand for His covenant. He wants us to Arise & Shine His Light to the nations. He wants us to stand with Israel.


September 11, 2001 was 2 years after September 11, 1999, "the day everything changed" and the judgment of the nations began. Three years in a row: 1999, 2000, & 2001, September 11 has been significant.


The Oslo accords were signed September 11-13, 1993 at Camp David, 7 years before the current Islamic intifada began in Israel.


The 7- year peace treaty ended specifically on time. It was the beginning of the current uprising--the time of Jacob's trouble has begun.

3. INP-Team letter. Summary of this issue

I Corinthians 10:32 "Give none offence, neither to the Jews, nor to the Gentiles, nor to the church of God." Three people groups to watch. God deals with all of them in the end-times.

Dear INP-Team,

In order to understand current world events, it is necessary to understand God's Covenant with Israel, both from the Old Testament prophets and the New Testament writers.

One of the purposes of INP-Team newsletter is to watch the fig tree, Israel, and to share understandings about her place in prophecy.

In this issue, we have shared about God's Moeds, appointed times for specific things to take place, from Billye Brim's teachings. I do not know Billye personally, but I have followed her ministry for many years. I have learned you can go to the bank with her teachings--which are always backed up with the specific prophecy in the Old Testament or a New Testament insight.

In the 70's, Billye says that the Lord showed her I Corinthians 10:32, which is quoted as the heading for this letter. She said that the Holy Spirit said to her: "If you will remember this verse of scripture, it will keep your end-time doctrine straight."

To finish this teaching on God's covenant with Israel, I have gathered the following scriptures with comments. Although this lengthens this newsletter, it is a completion of the picture--which is necessary in order to co-ordinate the New Testament teaching with the Old.

I hope it turns on a light for those of you that think the church has replaced Israel. In one way, we have, but in another way--we have not. For either Israel or the church to have a superior attitude is an error. God's plan encompasses both.

God is showing us the mystery of the Dispensation of the Fullness of Times. It includes all His promises to both spiritual & natural Israel. The church is an interlude in the history of Israel. We find our true significance when we see the over-all plan.

Ephesians 1:7-10 "In Him we have redemption through His blood, the forgiveness of sins, according to the riches of His grace which He made to abound toward us in all wisdom & prudence. Having made known to us the MYSTERY of His will, according to His good pleasure which He purposed in Himself,

"That in the dispensation of the fullness of the times, He might gather together in one all things in Christ, both which are in heaven and which are on earth--in Him."

Read with understanding. The future of our nation depends on it.

Blessings to all who read. Nancy White

"GOD'S COVENANTS WITH ISRAEL--OLD & NEW"

Here is Moses' song which was to be taught to the children of Israel as a witness against them...

Deuteronomy 32:1-44. The song was to be passed down from generation to generation as a witness against Israel from God. If Israel would be faithful to sing the song of Moses, they would know the truth about God's covenant with them. It was a prophecy by Moses concerning the latter days of Israel.

Deuteronomy 32:1-15 --God's blessing is upon Israel while they have no other gods but Jehovah.

PROSPERITY CAUSED ISRAEL TO TAKE BLESSINGS FOR GRANTED
Deuteronomy 32:15-20 --The prophecy about Jeshurun.

--'Jeshurun'--another name for Israel, meaning 'upright, blessed, nourished by God'--will get fat and take his covenant blessings lightly. Fat implies rich, lazy, proud in prosperity, & unconcerned about holy character & covenant with God. Fatness takes blessings for granted.

"But Jeshurun waxed fat, and kicked: you are waxed fat, you are grown thick; you are covered with fatness;

"Then he forsook God which made him, and lightly esteemed the Rock of his salvation. They provoked him to jealousy with strange gods, with abominations they provoked him to anger.

IDOLATRY CAUSED THEM TO FORGET JEHOVAH

"They sacrificed unto devils, not to God; to gods whom they knew not--gods that came newly up, whom your father feared not. Of the Rock that begat you, you are unmindful, and you have forgotten God that formed you.

"And when the LORD saw it, he abhorred them, because of the provoking of his sons and daughters. And he said, I will hide my face from them, I will see what their end shall be: for they are a very froward--self-centered self-willed--generation, children in whom is no faith."

THE CHURCH, "A FOOLISH NATION", PROPHESIED BY MOSES

Deuteronomy 32:21 "They have moved me to jealousy, with that which is not God; they have provoked me to anger with their vanities: and I will move them to jealousy with 'those which are not a people' ; I will provoke them to anger with 'a foolish nation'.

"For a fire is kindled in my anger, and shall burn unto the lowest hell, and shall consume the earth with her increase, and set on fire the foundations of the mountains. I will heap mischiefs upon them; I will spend my arrows upon them...."
(Who is this foolish nation that will provoke Israel to jealousy-- this people who are not a people? --It is the church, the body of Christ.)

ISRAEL'S ZEAL FOR GOD, NOT ACCORDING TO KNOWLEDGE

Romans 10:1-4 "Brethren, my heart's desire and prayer to God for Israel is that they might be saved. For I bear them record that they have a zeal of God but not according to knowledge.

"For they being ignorant of God's righteousness, and going about to establish their own righteousness, they have not submitted themselves unto the righteousness of God.

"For Christ is the end of the law for righteousness to everyone that believes."

ALL HAVE HEARD, BUT ALL HAVE NOT OBEYED

Romans 10:16-18 "But they have not all obeyed the gospel. For Isaiah said, 'Lord, who has believed our report? So then faith comes by hearing, and hearing by the word of God. But I say, Have they not heard? Yes, truely, their sound went into all the earth, and their words unto the ends of the world.'

(The world has heard the gospel of Jesus Christ--as well as the song of Moses. These are the 2 witnesses in the earth: The Old and the New Covenant--The Law of Moses & The Law of The Spirit of Life Through Jesus Christ.)

ISRAEL, A DISOBEDIENT & GAINSAYING PEOPLE

Romans 10:19-21
"But I say, 'Did not Israel know?'
"First Moses said, 'I will provoke you to jealousy by them that are not a people, and by a foolish nation I will anger you.' But Isaish is very bold and he said, 'I was found of them that did not seek me; I was made manifest (openly shown) to them that did not ask after me.

"But to Israel he said, "All day long I have stretched forth my hands unto a disobedient and gainsaying people."

HAS GOD CAST AWAY ISRAEL?

Romans 11:1-5 "I say then, Has God cast away his people? God forbid! For I also am an Israelite, of the seed of Abraham, of the tribe of Benjamin. God has not cast away his people which he foreknew.

"Don't you know what the scripture said about Elijah? How he made intercession to God against Israel, saying 'Lord, they have killed your prophets, and digged down your altars; and I am left alone, and they seek my life.'

"But what was the answer God gave to Elijah? 'I have reserved to myself 7000 men who have not bowed the knee to the image of Baal. Even so then at this present time also, there is a remnant according to the election of grace."

THE REMNANT WITHIN ISRAEL CAN SEE GOD'S PLAN

Romans 11:7-12 "What then? Israel (as a whole) has not obtained that which he sought for, but the election has obtained it, and the rest were blinded.

"according as it is written: 'God has given them the spirit of slumber, eyes that they should not see, and ears that they should not hear unto this day.

"And David said, 'Let their table be made a snare, and a trap, and a stumblingblock, and a recompense unto them; Let their eyes be darkened, that they may not see, and bow down their back always.'

ISRAEL'S UNBELIEF BROUGHT SALVATION TO THE GENTILES

"I (Paul) say then, 'Have they stumbled that they should fall? God forbid: but rather, through their fall, salvation is come unto the Gentiles, for to provoke them to jealousy. Now if the fall of them be the riches of the world, and the diminishing of them is the riches of the Gentiles, how much more will be their fulness?"

If the world has prospered during the diminishing of Israel--Think about this: the nations will really be blessed when Israel reigns in the fulness of its covenant blessing.

But first, God must clean house.

THE ROOT OF ISRAEL IS HOLY

Romans 11:13 "For I speak to you Gentiles...if by any means I may provoke to emulation (jealousy) them which are my flesh, and might save some of them. For if the casting away of them be the reconciling of the world, what shall the receiving of them be, but life from the dead?

For if the firstfruit be holy, the lump (sprout, root) is also holy; and if the root be holy, so are the branches."

GENTILES IN COVENANT ONLY BECAUSE OF GOD'S NEW COVENANT WITH ISRAEL

Jesus said, 'I am the vine, and you are the branches."

The root of the vine is God's covenant with the children of Israel. The Gentile branches have no covenant except as they abide in the vine (Jesus) who is rooted in Israel's covenant. Any church doctrine that denies God's everlasting covenant with Israel is a false doctrine.

ISRAEL WAS BROKEN OFF BECAUSE OF UNBELIEF

Romans 11:18-24 "Boast not against the branches...because of unbelief they were broken off, and you stand by faith. Be not highminded, but fear: For if God spared not the natural branches, take heed lest He also does not spare you.
"Behold, therefore, the goodness & severity of God--on them which fell --severity, but toward you, goodness.

ISRAEL TO BE GRAFTED BACK INTO THE GOOD OLIVE TREE

"Otherwise, you also shall be cut off. And they also, if they quit abiding in unbelief, they shall be grafted in. For God is able to graft them in AGAIN....For if you were cut out of the olive tree which is wild by nature, and were grafted into the good olive tree--How much more shall they which are the natural branches, be grafted into their own olive tree?"

MYSTERY: THE BLINDNESS OF ISRAEL IS JUST TILL THE FULNESS OF THE GENTILES IS COMPLETED.

Romans 11:25 "For I would not, brothers, that you should be ignorant of this mystery, lest you should be wise in your own conceits; that blindness in part is happened to Israel, until the fulness of the Gentiles be come in."

FULNESS OF THE GENTILES

What is the fulness of the Gentiles? The Gentiles, the nations of the world, are brought into and partake of the blessing of the knowledge of God's Covenant with Israel through His Son, Jesus Christ.

"Whosoever will, let him come, let him drink of the water of life, freely."

Also, the Fulness of the Gentiles is when the nations have run their course in the plan for the ages. It is the end of the Times of the Gentiles and the beginning of the dispensation of the Fulness of Times when all nations have been purged and Israel is restored to its covenant blessings both spiritually & physically.
The Fulness of the Gentiles is the bringing of the Gentiles into the church as part of the plan of God.

The Times of the Gentiles is Gentile world dominion until Israel as a whole accepts Christ, and the kingdom is fully restored to Israel.

JERUSALEM TO BE TRAMPLED BY THE GENTILES TILL THE TIME OF THE GENTILES IS FULFILLED.

Luke 21:24 (Jesus speaking:)

"And they will fall by the edge of the sword, and will be led captive into all the nations, and Jerusalem will be trampled under foot by the Gentiles until the Times of the Gentiles be fulfilled"

Idolatrous Israel was abhorred by God, divorced, and dispersed through the Gentile nations, losing their identity as Israel. But through God's Son, Jesus Christ, Israel is being restored and once again brought into marriage relationship with God. Jerusalem was to be trampled under foot by the Gentiles until the dispensation of Israel's Dispersal & Divorcement was finished--The end of the 2nd day.

GOD REMARRIES ISRAEL THROUGH HIS SON, JESUS-- WHO GAVE HIS LIFE FOR HIS BRIDE.

Ephesians 5:32 "This is a great mystery, but I speak concerning Christ and the church."

ISRAEL'S MAKER IS HER HUSBAND

Isaiah 54:3-5 "You shall break forth on the right hand and on the left; and your seed shall inherit the Gentiles and make the desolate cities to be inhabited.
'Fear not; for you shall not be ashamed, neither be confounded, for you shall not be put to shame. For you shall forget the shame of your youth, and you shall not remember the reproach of your widowhood anymore.

"For your Maker is your husband; the LORD of Hosts (angelic armies) is His name; and your Redeemer is the Holy One of Israel. The God of the whole earth shall He be called."

(Jesus is the fullness of the Godhead bodily--He is Creator, Redeemer, One with the Father.)

DATE SETTING?

Some Christians believe that the Feast of Tabernacles, The Year of Jubilee, 1997, marked the end of the Times of the Gentiles, which was a period of 2700 years., more or less. There is a period of around 700-800 years between the dispersal of Israel by the Assyrians in 722 BC, the Babylonian Captivity of Judah in 586 BC and the destruction of Jerusalem, 70 AD

Hence the 2000 years + 700-800 = approximately 2700-2800 years of banishment, give or take a few years. I don't have the exact information about this.
(This date for the drawing to a close of the Times of the Gentiles, Tabernacles 1997, does not conflict with September 11, 1999 which marks the beginning of the judgment of the nations. These are transitional periods. In retrospect, you can set dates, because history bears it out.

Jesus said no man would know the hour of His second-coming, except the Father himself--so we are not setting dates on that. We just know it is nearer than it was 2000 years ago, and that the time seems to be very soon.)

ISRAEL RESTORATION MINISTRIES


Many Israel restoration ministries have moved to Israel, and are working to bring salvation to both Jews & Arabs. Jerusalem now has many born again believers who are claiming the land for Israel and for the Lord.

The Tabernacle of David is being rebuilt through the praises of His people. Christians who visit Israel to worship & prayer walk the land are part of this movement.

Romans 11:26-29 "And so all Israel shall be saved: as it is written. 'There shall come out of Zion the Deliverer, and shall turn away ungodliness from Jacob: For this is my covenant unto them, when I shall take away their sins.

"As concerning the gospel, they are enemies for your sakes: but as touching the election, they are beloved for the fathers' sakes. For the gifts & calling of God are without repentance."

GENTILES OBTAINED MERCY THROUGH ISRAEL'S UNBELIEF
---NOW ISRAEL RECEIVES MERCY THROUGH GENTILES ---
ALL A PART OF GOD'S PLAN TO HAVE MERCY ON ALL.
Romans 11:31-36

"Even so, these also have not believed, that through your mercy they also may obtain mercy. For God has concluded them all in unbelief, that he might have mercy upon all.

"O, the depth of the riches both of the wisdom and knowledge of God! How unsearchable are his judgments, and His ways are past finding out!
"For who has known the mind of the Lord? Or who has been His counsellor? O who has first given to Him, and it shall be recompensed unto him again?
"For Of Him, and Through Him, and To Him, are all things: To Whom be Glory forever. Amen."
(end of chapter 11).

HAVING SAID ALL OF THAT--RENEW YOUR MIND SO THAT YOU CAN PROVE THE PERFECT WILL OF GOD.

Romans 12:1 THEREFORE--"I beg you, brothers, by the mercies of God, that you present your bodies a living sacrifice, holy, acceptable unto God, which is your reasonable service.

"And be not conformed to this world: but be transformed by the renewing of your mind, that you may prove what is that good, and acceptable, and perfect will of God!!"

THE NEW COVENANT--THAT NOT ANY SHOULD PERISH

God's Perfect Will is for all men to be saved! He is not willing that any perish.
Let us pray and work as never before to win the lost people groups to Christ--no matter what their ethnic background is. God loves the Jew, He loves the Muslim, He loves dispersed Israel that is now being ingathered. He loves the whole world. He desires all to come and be saved.

THE ANGELIC CONFLICT--A WAR BETWEEN GOOD & EVIL
Judgments are in the earth today. Also, Satan desires to destroy God's Plan for the Kingdom of God to reign over the earth. There are conflicting purposes in this struggle for dominion. One plan enslaves, and the other plan sets free.
Prayers of the saints can hold back the destruction of nations so that more people will come into the freedom of the knowledge of the Kingdom of God--which is Righteousness, Peace, & Joy in the Holy Ghost.

World Wars I & II were Satan's plan to destroy Israel and the people of God.
World War III has also been planned. The world is ultimately in God's hands ---but we are His hands on earth. He will allow what we allow.

He promises to redeem Israel, not only spiritually, but physically. (Romans 11 and Ezekiel 36.)

BOTH HOUSES OF ISRAEL HAVE FAILED & DESERVE PUNISHMENT
Both houses of Israel, Ephraim & Judah, screwed up royally--but God has not forgotten His promises. He will be made holy in the eyes of all nations. The nations who sneer and say Israel's God is weak--they will have a rude awakening soon.
The messengers of Jesus Christ see this coming, but their cry is "Grace, Grace"--"God have mercy on your people. Thank You that You remember Your covenant with us."

Zechariah 14:1 "Behold, the day of the LORD is coming, and your spoil will be divided in your midst. For I will gather all nations to battle against Jerusalem ....
"THEN-- the LORD will go forth and fight against those nations, as He fights in the day of battle...."

GOD WILL SAVE HIS PEOPLE

Zechariah 9:11-13, 16 "Because of the blood of your covenant, I will set your prisoners free...Return to the stronghold (the fortress of safety), you prisoners of hope. Even today, I declare that I will restore double to you.

"For I have bent Judah, which is my bow, and I have fitted the bow with Ephraim, and I have raised up your sons, O Zion, against your sons, O Greece, and made you like the sword of a mighty man."

"The LORD their God will save them in that day, as the flock of his people. For they shall be like the jewels of a crown, lifted like a banner over His land--For how great is its goodness, and how great its beauty..."

RESTORATION OF JUDAH & ISRAEL

Zechariah 10:1-5 "Ask the LORD for rain in the time of the latter rain. The LORD will make flashing clouds; He will give them showers of rain, grass in the field for everyone... (spiritual rain as well as physical.)

"For the idols speak delusion, and those who have a spirit of divination envision lies, and they tell false dreams. They comfort in vain. Therefore the people (of Judah & Ephraim) are like sheep. They are in trouble because there is no shepherd.

"My anger is kindled against the shepherd, and I will punish the goatherds (those who tend the goat nations).

"For the LORD of hosts will visit His flock, the house of Judah, and will make them as His royal horse in the battle.

From him, (Judah) comes the cornerstone, (Jesus), and from him, the tent peg, and from him, the battle bow. From him, (Lion of Judah) comes every ruler together.
"They shall be like mighty men, who tread down their enemies in the mire of the streets in the battle.

"They shall fight because the LORD is with them. And the riders on horses shall be put to shame." (in front of those who ride God's royal war-horse.)

Remember this passage says Judah is His royal war-horse.

JEHOVAH'S PROMISE TO HOUSE OF JUDAH & HOUSE OF JOSEPH:
Zechariah 10:6-12

"I will strengthen the house of Judah. And I will save the house of Joseph.
"I will bring them back, because I have mercy on them. They shall be as though I had not cast them aside: for I am the LORD their God. And I will hear them.
"Those of Ephraim shall be like a mighty man, and their heart shall rejoice as if with wine. Yes, their children shall see it and be glad; Their heart shall rejoice in the LORD.

"I will whistle for them and gather them; And they shall increase as they once increased.

"I will sow them among the peoples. And they shall remember Me in far countries; they shall live with their children, and they shall return.

EGYPT & ASSYRIA WILL BE JUDGED

(The land of Assyrian empire is the present day Iran and Iraq, strongholds of Allah. Assyria is the nation that originally conquered Ephraim.)

" I will bring them back from the land of Egypt, (Judah's dispersal) and gather them from Assyria (Ephraim's dispersal ). I will bring them into the land of Gilead and Lebanon, until no more room is found for them....

"The pride of Assyria shall be brought down, and the scepter of Egypt shall depart.
"So I will strengthen them in the LORD, and they shall walk up and down in His Name, (Yahweh, Jehovah)" says the LORD."

ISRAEL'S CURSE AMONG THE NATIONS TO BE REMOVED

Zechariah 8:13 "And it shall come to pass that just as you were a curse among the nations, O house of Judah and house of Israel, so will I save you, and you shall be a blessing. Do not fear. Let your hands be strong."

THE REPENTANCE THAT GOD REQUIRES IN ORDER FOR ISRAEL TO BE BLESSED:

Zechariah 8:15-17 "So I am determined to do good to Jerusalem and to the house of Judah. "Do not fear. These are the things you shall do:

1) Speak each man the truth to his neighbor. (QUIT LYING).
2) Give judgment in your gates for truth, justice, & peace. (GOVERNING AUTHORITY THAT GIVES JUSTICE TO ALL)
3) Let none of you think evil in your heart against your neighbor. (LOVE GOD AND LOVE YOUR NEIGHBOR)
4) And do not love a false oath." (GET RID OF IDOLATRY) (False oath--initiation vows into secret societies-- Let your yes be 'yes' and your no be 'no'. Anything more is sin.)

" 'For all of these things are things that I hate,' says the LORD."

RIGHTEOUS NATIONS WILL PURSUE THE JEWS' FAVOR

Zechariah 8:23 "Thus says the LORD of hosts: 'In those days, 10 men from every language of the nations shall grasp the sleeve of a Jewish man, saying, "Let us go with you, for we have heard that God is with you..."

God wants to bless the children of Israel: both Jews & Ephraim. Aliens or strangers to the covenant are adopted or grafted in when they embrace the God of Israel and His promises. No one with a repentant heart is excluded.

THEY ALL-- (THE WHOLE WORLD)-- WILL BEHOLD HIM WHOM THEY HAVE PIERCED--JESUS CHRIST, THE SON OF GOD-- who died for the sins of all mankind, not just Israel.

John 3:16 "For God so loved THE WORLD that He gave His only begotten Son that whosoever believes in Him shall not perish but have everlasting life."
Our responsibility is to get into that place of blessing through repentance and obedience--and to hang on to the promises of the covenant.

It is to turn from every unclean thing--practices that bring destruction such as: killing of innocents (abortion), perversions, homosexuality, and dabbling with the occult through entertainment, false oaths, learning the depths of Satan. (Harry Potter is a prime example.)

God will judge the nations for these practices. The Judgement has begun.
Study the covenant to Israel--it is fulfilled in the New Covenant. God promised to write His word in our hearts, and He has! ----------------

If you pray alone, you are the power of one; each person you add to the equation is a power of 10: first added & then multiplied. The glory of God is manifest in corporate worship--which is the highest form of prayer. We are looking for prayer partners...people who have a vision for the glory of God to be manifest in the earth.

Nancy White www.internationalnetworkprayerteam.org

  Wednesday, February 23, 2011

Jim Kerr 'Nuked'

Response to "Response To James "Infensus Mentis"/"Crimes Of Zion" Linton"



This is a fun-filled response to the (as one associate of mine called it) "gnat-straining" piece written by Jim Kerr for the Brendon O'Connell web site and published there on Feb 21, 2011. Therein, Kerr responds to two separate comments I submitted to the O'Connell blog. Let's get straight to it, but first, check out my comments as they were actually submitted, so you can see how Kerr misquotes me by changing the grammar, chopping sentences in half, and putting capital letters in place of lower case ones. The first comment is here, the second here. I won't be deceiving and misleading readers of this post, as he does. His comments will be shown here exactly as they are in his 'article', minus the ubiquitous hyperlinks. He refuses to include mine, so I'll simply copy-and-paste the text like he does.

I suggest we set fair terms on this "challenge"

And I suggest Linton gets his skinny, stinky, unhygienic arse round to Lieblich's offices and confront him on camera instead of trying to invent excuses for chickening-out of the challenge I have put to him. It is looking very much like Infested Mouthpiece a.k.a. Chicken of Zion is afraid to go after the big-fish, as his pal "Poseidon" advocates. If so, psychopathic junkie-boy Linton could always ingest some metamphetamine, dextroamphetamine, salvia divinorum, LSD, ecstasy, ketamine, dimethyltryptamine to induce Dutch courage.


Where's the full stop at the end of my sentence (in bold)? I'm sure I put one there. Anyway.

1) Here's why I won't accept Kerr's "challenge" to visit Steve Lieblich with a video camera. It's very simple: Because Kerr told me to. The second he did that, he sealed the deal. I'll eat a tablespoon of my own shit and chase it down with a shot-glass of my own piss before I let Jim "Armchair General" Kerr tell me what activism is, and how I should be engaging in it. Unlike Kerr, I am an activist; that is to say, I actually leave my home to meet with other people and groups, organise events and screenings, attend real-life protests, distribute DVD media (documentaries and assorted video compilations) in order to raise awareness of the issues -- stuff like that. What I do has always been decided upon and determined by me, no-one else, and that's not about to change anytime soon.

2) I haven't made any "excuses", as Kerr claims. I'm flat-out telling him to shove it up his arse, suggesting in the process that he engage in some real life activism of his own before (and instead of) issuing mind-bogglingly hypocritical "challenges" to others who are already doing it. Fair enough?

3) I've experimented with all of the substances Kerr lists above, and I've admitted that openly and publicly, in writing. If I hadn't, he wouldn't know about it. But it wasn't me that got so blind drunk that I passed out on a railway track and lost an arm to a speeding locomotive. That was Kerr, and if that isn't substance abuse I don't know what is. Silly prick.

Perhaps Johnson will take you up on it if you volunteer to do the same

Yeah right. As if I'm going to fly over 9000 miles to Australia to confront a rabid Zionist who lives just 5-10 minutes walk from where Linton lives. Moreover, since Linton's pal Johnson lives in Perth, he is much better located to visit Lieblich than am I. But Linton is even closer still...he's almost Lieblich's neighbour.


Now Kerr is really starting to fiddle with my grammar, chopping my sentence in half in the process in order to mislead his readers. The astute reader will have noticed Kerr's deceptive modus operandi; he is taking my words out of context by separating them from the other words that make up the sentence. Here is what I wrote:

Perhaps Johnson will take you up on it if you volunteer to do the same -- get your fat, stinky, unhygienic arse out from behind that computer and get onto the streets.

As is plain to see, by "do the same" I wasn't suggesting that Kerr "fly over 9000 miles to Australia", and he knows it. Rather, I was suggesting that we set fair terms on Kerr's "challenge" to Steve Johnson. If Kerr wants a little, he should be prepared to give a little. As someone who is currently using the O'Connell site to issue multiple "open challenges" ostensibly designed to inspire real life activism, he should be willing to work in the real world as an activist himself. But he's not. Why? What is he afraid of? Is he a pussy, a hypocrite, lazy, or all three? It's not as if he's too busy or doesn't have the time, that much is certain.

"Get your fat, stinky, unhygienic arse out from behind that computer and get onto the streets"

Both Linton and "Poseidon" of takeourworldback.com have been claiming for over a year now that I am supposedly "afraid to leave my house". The (dis)information upon which they base their false claim was supplied to them by Linton's friend in Sheffield, a self-admitted, mentally ill heroin addict known as Daniel Calvert John "Smackhead" Makeham. And if Linton actually believed this propaganda, he would hardly have issued a counter-challenge for me to venture outside since he would have already "known" that I am supposedly "agoraphobic". Right? Linton evidently does not believe the propaganda that he and his friends are posting on Internet forums and on the web sites that they control.


Firstly, check out what he's done here. Not only has be bizarrely switched to adding quotation marks for this particular line, but he's capitalised the 'g' in "get" in order to deceive the reader into believing that it's a new sentence, rather than the end of the first one. "Perhaps Johnson will take you up on it if you volunteer to do the same -- get your fat, stinky, unhygienic arse out from behind that computer and get onto the streets". That is what I wrote. Taking words out of context is deceptive, and deception makes one a bullshitter.

Secondly, I have never claimed that Kerr is afraid to leave his home. He's bullshitting again. I'm about to speculate on precisely that so stick around, but if Kerr could produce evidence that I've done so in the past, you know he'd do so. He's got screen-shots of just about everything I've ever written.

Thirdly and most importantly, what the hell is this poofter raving on about? What kind of response is that to a perfectly reasonable suggestion that he get off his arse and engage in some real life activism? Yes, I called him fat, stinky and unhygienic while suggesting it, but he is fat, stinky and unhygienic. In any case, he's working very hard to stay away from the activism issue, isn't he?

Start fighting the war like a real man.

This is an amusing statement to make given that Linton is a huge supporter and promoter of "Poseidon", the guy who has consistently refused to reveal his true identity, his location, or any other personal information whatsoever. Linton the double-talking hypocrite ought to save his pious lectures for his evasive mate.


Whut? What the fuck is this knob-end on about? So what if Poseidon chooses to remain anonymous on the Internet? What the hell does that have to do with anything? Since Kerr doesn't know who Poseidon is, he has no way of knowing whether or not he takes part in real life activism. He could be the lead organiser for the local chapter of 'Save The Penguins' for all Kerr fucking knows. No, you won't get out of it that easily, Kerr. I'm not talking to Poseidon, I'm talking to you, the guy who thinks hassling people with video cameras is a fantastic idea and, by the look of it, the only legitimate form of "activism". More on that later.

I myself am actively involved with several groups here in Perth

Doing what exactly? Nurturing his contacts network with a view to boosting his drug-related earnings of $85,000 a year?


No, I'm out there connecting with like-minded people, raising awareness and trying to change for the better the world we live in, but nice try, dipshit. Hey I'm not the only one that can see how much of a twat you are, you know. Your readers can, too.

I'm currently organising a Unity Festival to unite the local activist scene

All hail James "Invented Messiah" Linton, the self-ordained saviour of Perth's "fractious activist scene" and "small 9-11 truth crew". Tel Aviv must be shaking in their boots at the potential damage that Linton's picnic is going to inflict upon world Jewry.


Again, Kerr is chopping up my sentences. Here's what I wrote:

I myself am actively involved with several groups here in Perth and I'm currently organising a Unity Festival to unite the local activist scene, and I've seen Johnson (and even his children) demonstrating at least 2 FOPWA rallies -- not exactly hiding behind a telephone.

Why the fuck can't Kerr keep my sentences intact? Was that too much to swallow all at once or what? I'm doing just fine without butchering his remarks, but he cuts up what I write so finely that technically, he's not addressing me at all. He's addressing what looks to me like someone who doesn't know where the full stop key is, and misrepresenting my comments to the point that they bear very little resemblance to what I actually wrote. My guess is that he's being deliberately disingenuous and attempting to make himself look smarter and more articulate than I am. As Kerr would say, "you decide".

Anyway, back to his response. It was, for those with short memories:

I'm currently organising a Unity Festival to unite the local activist scene

All hail James "Invented Messiah" Linton, the self-ordained saviour of Perth's "fractious activist scene" and "small 9-11 truth crew". Tel Aviv must be shaking in their boots at the potential damage that Linton's picnic is going to inflict upon world Jewry.


Here is some information about the first picnic meeting that Kerr is referring to, so that you know what he's talking about. A second took place this month, and so far things aren't looking too bad; we should be able to pull it off (you'll notice at that last link that I am only one of three organisers, and that it's only Kerr who is talking about "messiahs" and "saviours". As the event comes together and the local scene coalesces, I may well step aside to let more seasoned event organisers take the reins. I am not emotionally attached to this thing, I don't consider it to be my 'baby', and it wasn't even my idea.) But as you can see, Kerr is doing his damnedest to mock and trivialize my actual activism in order to steer his readers' attention away from his total lack of activism, and it's transparent as all fuck. You, Mr. Kerr, are a first class twat.

I've seen Johnson (and even his children) demonstrating at least 2 FOPWA rallies -- not exactly hiding behind a telephone

So, Linton believes that participation in pro-Palestinian demonstrations would inflict a more serious blow on Israel than exposing someone who is heavily involved with a suspected Mossad-front, someone who Linton himself has described as a "rabid Zionist", someone who is also heavily involved with the Australian Jewish lobby? And Linton calls me "delusional". Pah.


More obfuscating, misdirection and typical convoluted Kerrian bullshit. This is what I was addressing with that remark:

"He didn't hide behind a telephone like you [Steve Johnson] do. Brendon has proven himself. You haven't."

If someone were to expose Steve Lieblich as being an agent of the Mossad (for example and for argument's sake), then yes, that someone's time will have been better spent on that than on taking part in a protest rally as a single participant in a crowd of other protesters. But we're not talking about that, are we. As is plain to see, I was pointing out that Johnson does more than just make phonecalls -- he gets out on the street (with a video camera too, it just so happens) because he cares about the Palestinians and he's pissed, very pissed, at the racist, apartheid state of 'Israel'. If Kerr has done the same - let alone take to the streets with a video camera - I'll eat my own nuts. Kerr doesn't even "hide behind a telephone" as he accuses Johnson of doing, by recording phone calls to Jewish / Zionist organisations as Johnson does. The only recording of Kerr's voice ever to have been released is here. (He has done a 'state of Israel' with that recording by releasing written statements refusing to confirm or deny it, maintaining a policy of deliberately deceptive 'ambiguity'. Clearly if it were not his voice, he would simply deny it.)

At this point, it's worth looking at my comment in its entirety a second time:

He didn't hide behind a telephone like you do. Brendon has proven himself. You haven't.

I suggest we set fair terms on this "challenge". Perhaps Johnson will take you up on it if you volunteer to do the same -- get your fat, stinky, unhygienic arse out from behind that computer and get onto the streets. Start fighting the war like a real man. I myself am actively involved with several groups here in Perth and I'm currently organising a Unity Festival to unite the local activist scene, and I've seen Johnson (and even his children) demonstrating at least 2 FOPWA rallies -- not exactly hiding behind a telephone. Will you rise to the challenge, Kerr? Will you pick up a camera and confront some real Jews?

I think not, you hilarious old try-hard bastard.


So as you can see, Kerr has isolated a part of my comment after splitting a sentence into sections, taken it out of context, and misrepresented its meaning. He then uses the newly manufactured context to his advantage by dribbling the kind of shit you see above, of which there's plenty more to come. It should be becoming clear by now that Kerr is not the 'honest researcher' that he portrays himself to be.

Will you rise to the challenge, Kerr? Will you pick up a camera and confront some real Jews?

If Linton were to dip-in to that huge inheritance of his and buy me a return ticket to Perth, I'd happily fly out and pay Lieblich a visit myself seeing as neither him or his pal Steve "Nephilim70" Johnson appear to have the desire.


So sure am I that Kerr is unwilling to do any actual footwork for the anti-Zionist cause that I am, right now, hereby offering to pay half the cost of a return ticket from England to Perth, Australia so that Kerr can "expose" Lieblich on camera. This is no bluff; all Kerr has to do is match me dollar-for-dollar and pound-for-pound. What say ye, Kerr? That's a pretty good deal. Australia is a beautiful place and since you're unemployed and on a welfare pension, you have plenty of free time to put aside for a holiday.

Alternatively, if Linton were to send me details of any rabid Zionists who are heavily involved with a suspected Mossad front organisation and who happen to live in the same neighbourhood as me, I'd be delighted to accept his counter-challenge. But since Linton isn't going to pay for me to fly to Australia, and since there are no Jews living in my neighbourhood that I am aware of - unlike Linton's which is crawling with the fuckers - I will decline his counter-challenge. In any event, I'm supposedly "agoraphobic", aren't I? Is this not what Linton and his friends "Poseidon" and Daniel Calvert John "Smackhead" Makeham have been telling people for the last year or so? And if I'm "agoraphobic", as Linton and his friends claim, then how the hell could I ever be expected to venture outside my house? Linton can't have it both ways. He either believes the propaganda that he and his motley crew are spouting or he doesn't.


Again, I've never claimed that Kerr is "agoraphobic", and I challenge him to produce evidence that I have. The entirely believable "never ever leaves the house" claim was made by his partner's son, Dan Makeham, who has lived with Kerr.

And again, look at how the limp-ankled foot-waggler tries to wiggle out of my perfectly reasonable suggestion that he himself do what he is challenging Johnson to do. Just look at it. 'Since this is the case and that is the case, how can I blah blah blah?' What a fucking dick.

I think not, you hilarious old try-hard bastard

But this isn't about me rising to Linton's counter-challenge, it's all about Linton rising to mine. But will he do so? I think not. James "Whippersnapper" Linton is a man of words, not a man of action. He'd much rather discuss Verint from within the safety of Internet forums rather than pay one of their top men in Australia a personal visit.


You're damn right Kerr, I won't be doing that at all. As I said, you can shove it up your fat, unwashed arse. I will, however, fork out hundreds of dollars to help you do it yourself. I'm not joking around, either. Let's see what you've got.



Maybe O'Connell supporters could sponsor a Jim Kerr "Get-Off-Your-Arse-In-2011" appeal!



Kerr now begins to address my second comment.

Classic! Kerr, you are one of the dumbest bastards I've ever come across

But if I'm so "dumb" then one must wonder why Linton has devoted so much time over the course of the last four years trying to "debunk" me. Doesn't Linton attempting to "debunk" someone he perceives to be "dumb" make him even dumber still?


I don't "try" to debunk Kerr, I just debunk him. I don't always have the time, but when I do, it's fun as fuck. Kerr is an utter numpty.

Take another look at the comment I wrote about Lieblich

The first sentence of Linton's statement was: "There's something I didn't know." The next sentence of his statement was: "Steve Lieblich is a major player for the Australian Zionist lobby". This can be interpreted as him admitting that there's something he didn't know: that Lieblich is a major player for the Australian Jewish lobby.


Only by an utter numpty. Here is the "statement" Kerr is referring to.



You'll notice that he doesn't show a picture of this in the 'article' I'm now responding to -- his own screen capture -- and he doesn't provide a link to it, either. But Jim Kerr loves hyperlinks! Do you suppose he might be trying to bullshit us again?

Clearly I have written that I wasn't aware of his relationship with the Keysers

There's nothing "clear" about Linton's statement at all. "There's something I didn't know. Lieblich is a major player for the Australian Zionist lobby" can be taken as a statement of Linton not being familiar with Steve Lieblich.


Yes, by an utter numpty. Kerr claims that "[t]he first sentence of Linton's statement was: "There's something I didn't know. Lieblich is a major player for the Australian Zionist lobby"." But that's not quite true, is it. Linton's comment begins with a quote from an article, and it is that quote which Linton is commenting on. I've very clearly put "Family friend Steve Lieblich" in bold, and I even typed "[Keyser]" in front of "Family friend Steve Lieblich" to produce "[Keyser] Family friend Steve Lieblich". I then remarked that "[t]here's something I didn't know," as a clear reference to Steve Lieblich being a family friend of the Keysers. Kerr knows this, but he's insulting his readers with this codswallop:

"There's something I didn't know. Lieblich is a major player for the Australian Zionist lobby" can be taken as a statement of Linton not being familiar with Steve Lieblich.


And it doesn't stop there (and I literally mean, it doesn't stop there). My sentence did not finish with "Lieblich is a major player for the Australian Zionist lobby", as Kerr implies. The full sentence is "Lieblich is a major player for the Australian Zionist lobby (including but not limited to AIJAC), so if the Keyser family were indeed friends with Lieblich prior to this episode, it's no wonder such a big deal was made out of such a minor altercation."

It should be crystal clear by now that Kerr consistently misleads his readers in order to induce them to arrive at erroneous conclusions. In other words, Kerr is a bullshit artist.

Not that I wasn't aware of Steve Lieblich's rabid Zionism

In which case a question then arises as to why Linton did not expose the fact that Lieblich is heavily involved with the suspected Mossad-front, Verint. There are only two possible answers: a) he didn't know of Lieblich's involvement with Verint, or b) he knew.


Jim "PlanetClouseau" Kerr is nousey bastard, isn't he. His probing questions are fascinating and his powers of deduction and meticulous analysis are nothing short of astonishing< /sarcasm>. The answer is I didn't know.

In the first scenario, Linton would stand accused of sloppy research and not exercising due diligence at the very least. If Linton was already aware of Steve Lieblich and knew him to be a "rabid Zionist" and a "major player" for the Australian Jewish lobby as he claims, then surely he would have carried-out some background checks on Lieblich? Right? But did he? It would appear not. But if Linton did actually check Lieblich's background, he must then explain how he somehow managed to not spot that Lieblich is heavily involved with Verint

I had never heard of Steve Lieblich prior to the day that Brendon O'Connell was convicted. After Lieblich began making statements to the media on behalf of "the Jewish community", I decided to look into Lieblich's background. It took me all of five minutes to discover that Lieblich is heavily involved with Verint. If Linton didn't already know this, he won't half look a tool given that he believes me to be one of the "dumbest bastards" that he's "ever come across".

But if the second scenario is correct, Linton would then stand accused of suppressing vital information: that Steve Lieblich is heavily-involved with a suspected Mossad-front group. Questions would then be asked as to why he did not go public with this vital information. Linton would be wide-open to legitimate accusations of covering-up vital evidence and of protecting Lieblich.

So, which of these two scenarios is correct? Did Linton priorly know about Lieblich's involvement with Verint, or did he not?


As I say, I didn't know, and I didn't know because I hadn't checked. Let's do a Google search for "Steve Lieblich" + Verint. The lieblich.com.au/verint page is the 4th listing on my end, and I imagine it would've been the first before Whitelaw Towers started writing about it. And Ker says that took him 5 minutes? He must have a pretty slow Internet connection, because it only took me 1.

Of course I know who Lieblich is.

A candid admission. So, the first scenario outlined above is correct.


Genius.

Linton is therefore guilty of sloppy research and of not exercising due diligence. His "credibility" as a "researcher" is now called into question and he now appears very foolish and conceited given that someone he perceives to be "dumb", and who he considers to be "delusional", has managed to discover vitally-important information that Linton my supposed intellectual "superior" has somehow "overlooked". Should Linton attempt to save face by coming back with: "I knew all about Lieblich's involvement with Verint all along", he is then obliged to offer a credible explanation as to why he has not published this vitally-important information in the public domain.


Blah blah blah blah. You're rambling, Kerr. This is what I have to put up with, non-stop fucking idiocy disguised as brilliant deductive reasoning from the super-sleuth of Sheffield.

As a local activist for Palestine I've been aware of his sorry arse for years

Yet another candid admission.


Whoops, I really put myself in it there, didn't I. I should've known PlanetClouseau wouldn't let me get away with that one.

So, despite him having been aware of Lieblich "for years", are we supposed to believe that all this time Linton has remained "blissfully ignorant" of Lieblich's involvement with a suspected Mossad-front, a salient fact that took me just five minutes to discover. And despite Linton having also been aware "for years" that Steve Lieblich is a "rabid Zionist" as well as a "major player" for the Australian Zionist lobby", are we are also supposed to believe that Linton did not know that Lieblich resides in the same suburb? And are we supposed to believe that despite Linton's candid admission of him having been aware of Steve Lieblich "for years" and of Linton being fully aware of Verint's Australian operations, Linton was somehow unable to connect the dots? James Linton has a lot of explaining to do.


No, I don't. I had a lot of laughing to do but I'm over it now. Now I've just got a stupid grin on my face, but I'm sure some of the people reading this right now will be cracking a giggle.

My friend, associate and former convener of FOPWA Alex Whisson (now Public Advocate of Australians For Palestine) has debated him several times on air and in print

Linton's "friend" and "associate" appears to be too embarrassed to link to any of the blogs Linton operates. Maybe Whisson is too ashamed to be publicly known as a "friend" and "associate" of a psychopathic, possibly bi-sexual junkie who thinks that creating and distributing a blasphemous image of Jesus Christ is "funny". Pehaps Whisson is too ashamed to let it be known that while his "friend" and "associate" protests at the loss of Palestinian lives, that same "friend" and "associate" didn't give "a fuck" about the death of his own unborn, infant child, who was aborted in a Perth clinic while James "I Care A Lot" Linton watched the 9-11 attacks on TV.


Yeah ummm, I dunno. I don't know what he's on about either. Here is FOPWA's list of links. There's not much there, is there. I count eleven links. I would imagine that they don't link to sites like Crimes of Zion because it delves into matters such as Israel and 9/11, not because I was in an abortion clinic on that day or because of my irreverent sense of humour. "Perhaps" Palestine Solidarity organisations aren't in the habit of conflating justice for the Palestinians with the 9/11 issue, but that's just a wild guess.

http://wakeupfromyourslumber.com/video/pandora/mv-rachel-corrie-will-not-be-allowed-reach-gaza-implies-israeli-mouthpiece-mark-regev#comment-45620 http://australiansforpalestine.com/19007

As you can see, the first link is a comment I wrote halfway through last year, laying to waste your absurd claim that I didn't know that Steve Lieblich is a major player for the Australian Zionist lobby. Do you feel like a tool? You should


I don't actually. I feel great knowing that Linton has publicly revealed himself to be a sloppy researcher who doesn't exercise due diligence, and who somehow "overlooks" vitally-important information such as Steve Lieblich being heavily involved with the suspected Mossad-front, Verint. James Linton is the one who looks like a tool, not I. Linton is the one who makes public boasts of him supposedly being "smarter" than me. But it wasn't James Linton who discovered Lieblich's heavy involvement with Verint. It was me. So who's the tool here?


You are, Kerr. Do you feel like a tool? You should. You really, really, should.

I resolutely stand by my claim that no single person has done more to sabotage the Perth anti-Zionist scene than has O'Connell

But does Linton still stand "resolutely" behind his absurd claim that Brendon O'Connell is Daryl Bradford Smith a.k.a."Fester"? Is he still "80% convinced" that his claim is factual rather than a load of nonsense, or has Linton's 20% uncertainty now escalated to 100%? If Linton no longer believes his ridiculous claim to be the truth, will he have the balls to publicly admit that he was wrong, or is such an act of humility beneath his arrogance?


No, I'll quite happily admit I was wrong. But Kerr will also have to admit that my absurd claim was made only once or twice and had arisen out of speculation that lasted not more than a week, before being promptly binned. Compare that to Kerr's two-year campaign of disinformation designed to convince the world that "Brendon O'Connell does not actually exist - except in the vivid imagination of Jamie Linton a.k.a. Crimes of Zion". Or his hilarious obsession with Poseidon of TakeOurWorldBack.com being Peter Wakefield Sault. Or any number of other equally hilarious and equally ridiculous theories about person 'x' being person 'y'. And speaking of Fester, wasn't it Kerr that mistook me (and O'Connell, since we were the same person for 2 years) for that particular WUFYS poster? I think it was.

It wasn't me that raised the specter of "anti-Semitism" to such heights that it catalyzed the formation of one of the most powerful Zionist groups in the country. Brendon O'Connell did that

I quote from "J-Wire":

"The Jewish community wanted to show support for Israel after O’Connell had been charged and a group of us got together with one purpose in mind…to find support for Israel not just from the Jewish community but from all Australians. Today’s event was the culmination of this initiative. Instead of the usual 300-400 diehard Jewish supporters we got 1500 of which about 75% were not Jewish."


That Linton should accuse Brendon O'Connell of raising "the spectre" of "anti-Semitism", should tell you much about James Linton. Linton talks just like one would expect a Jew to talk. And if Linton seriously believes that that "Friends of Israel WA" was formed as a consequence of "The Jewish community" wanting to "show support for Israel after O'Connell had been charged", then by default, Linton would be acknowledging that Brendon O'Connell has inflicted damage upon Israel, in which case one would be expecting Linton the "anti-Zionist" to be applauding and commending Brendon instead of attacking him at every available opportunity as he and his associates have relentlessly done ever since Brendon told Linton back in 2007 that he wanted nothing to do with him.


1) O'Connell has done no discernible damage to Israel, but he's certainly done some damage here in Australia. Show me how he's hurt Israel, Kerr. There's a challenge. Don't even get me started on the damage he's done in my country. I already touched on that here, but an entire essay would be required to explore in depth the full extent to which O'Connell's dickwad sabotage operation has damaged Australian anti-Zionism, and even global anti-Zionism, for that matter.

It's not without reason that manufactured "anti-Semitism" has been put to use by Zionist interests for all these decades. "The anti-Semites shall be our best friends", remember? And you wonder why I think you're stupid.

2) O'Connell did not tell me in 2007 that "he wanted nothing to do with" me. On the contrary, he publicly declared that he was making it his mission to "destroy" me, and his 3 year stalking campaign is another minor tidbit that belies that claim, you idiot. When you don't want anything to do with someone, you don't visit them at their home repeatedly with a video camera. Neither do you contest a restraining order specifically designed to ensure that you will have 'nothing more to do with' that person. Especially when you have nothing to lose by that order but physical contact.

Should Linton not actually believe that Brendon has inflicted damage upon Israel, then he is guilty of parroting Jewish propaganda. For someone who denies being a Jew, James "Look At The Size Of My Beak" Linton sure talks and acts like one. He looks like a Jew too, don't you think? Pro-Jewish web sites are even promoting his essay on Judaism. And if this doesn't tell you all you need to know about where James "Crimes of Zion"/"Infensus Mentis" Linton's true sympathies lie, nothing will.


This single pro-Jewish website that is "promoting" my "essay on Judaism" is also "promoting" Kerr's work; articles from the FugaziQuo blog. Or perhaps I should say "articles", because most of Kerr's serious stuff (stuff that isn't frivolous bullshit such as that which I'm currently responding to) is just copy-and-pasted from other sites.

Kerr knows that the pro-Jewish, pro-Zionist web site Anti-Semitism.net "promotes" anything that it identifies as having to do with "anti-Semitism", and if he doesn't know, he's "publicly revealed himself to be a sloppy researcher who doesn't exercise due diligence." For example, Anti-Semitism.net "promotes" the work of Chris Bjerknes, Mike "Prothink" Delaney, Brother Nathaniel Kapner and even Adam Austin's crap over at Subverted Nation. Oh, and let's not forget Brendon O'Connell.

Kerr writes that I look like a Jew and that I have a Jewish-looking "beak". Either Kerr doesn't know what a Jewish beak looks like, or he's bullshitting again (it should be clear by now that Kerr isn't averse to a bit of bullshit here and there). For those who are interested, my "beak" is viewable both on video and in numerous photographs released by myself over the years. You decide.

It wasn't I who publicly advocated that Jews be rounded up and imprisoned in camps, or that their days were numbered; (it turns out the only person whose days have been numbered is O'Connell). No, it was O'Connell who did that, too

In his "First Fruits" video (4:28), Brendon states clearly and unambiguously that the people whose days are numbered are those members of the Judaic community who remain silent and uncritical of Judaism's worst excesses - and there are plenty. But of course, Linton would have issues with Brendon's belief that Judaism is the problem - Linton believes that Zionism rather than Judaism is the problem. Linton defends Judaism, so much so that a pro-Jewish web site saw fit to promote the piece. But Zionism has only been around since the late 1800s. Judaism has been around for thousands of years. It wasn't "Zionists" who wrote the Talmud, Judaism's most holiest book. It was Jews. And it wasn't "Zionists" who have been expelled from over a hundred locations since 250 A.D. It was Jews.


Firstly, Kerr's misquoting of my comment in this instance is particularly interesting. Take another look at what I actually wrote and how I wrote it. Where earlier he added quotation marks, this time he has deliberately removed them. Check it out:

"It wasn't I who publicly advocated that Jews be rounded up and imprisoned in "camps", or that their "days were numbered" (it turns out the only person whose days have been numbered is O'Connell). No, it was O'Connell who did that, too."

I draw your attention to the text in bold. Clearly I've used quotation marks there, and clearly he has copied-and-pasted my words for his article. He's gone to the trouble of altering what I wrote by manually removing the quotes. Why? Consider his remarks immediately below my butchered commentary: "But of course, Linton would have issues with Brendon's belief that Judaism is the problem - Linton believes that Zionism rather than Judaism is the problem. Linton defends Judaism, so much so that a pro-Jewish web site saw fit to promote the piece." Could it be that he's attempting to portray me as 'pro-Jewish' to O'Connell's "anti-Judaic" readership? That's my guess, but hey: "You decide".

Secondly, Kerr repeats his misleading bullshit about a "pro-Jewish" web site "promoting" my Judaism Is Not The Problem piece, and attempts to paint me as an apologist for Judaism. Not so. Everyone who has read it knows that I roundly condemn Judaic extremism, and not even White Nationalist icon John de Nugent suggested in his comment that I was too soft on Judaism.

Judaism Is Not The Problem is less about what is and isn't "the problem" than what is and isn't a viable strategy for dealing with the problem. I believe Kerr knows this, but of course, he's out to win a shitfight so all bets are off as far as he's concerned. He's a disingenuous bullshit artist, and I mean a true artist (fiddling with quotation marks, spinning the "promotion" of my work by Anti-Semitism.net, subtle disinformation techniques etc. etc.); why should one be surprised to see him using bullshit artist tactics?

It wasn't James Linton who exposed Verint's operations in Australia. No, it was Brendon O'Connell who did that. And it wasn't James Linton who had the motivation to confront a Zionist Jew on camera and rip his paltry arguments to shreds. No, it was Brendon O'Connell who did that too.


Brendon O'Connell has "exposed" nothing, and anyone who has been watching closely enough knows this. That topic is deserved of an article of its own, and I suspect there's one on its way. But it certainly was O'Connell who "had the motivation to confront a Zionist Jew on camera and rip his paltry arguments to shreds." Yes, and he fucked it up so royally that we're all paying the price, especially him. Kerr came dangerously close to using the word "courage" there I think, but wisely decided not to. Poor, skinny, whiny little Stanley Keyser, being chased down the street by 110 kilogram Brendon O'Connell. Keyser's arguments were indeed "paltry", I'll agree with Kerr there, so I imagine that Kerr would agree with me that it didn't take a genius to 'rip them to shreds'.

And it wasn't me who did everything in my power to lose a court case which, from the very start, Western Australian anti-Zionists could not afford to lose

Linton asserts that Brendon "did everything in his power" to 'deliberately' try and "lose a court case", but he is oh so wrong. I spoke with Brendon on the phone the night before his conviction, and any illusions he might have had of winning his case were no longer present. He knew by this point that a guilty verdict was imminent and that he was going to prison. He was quite upset at the prospect. Who wouldn't be? This is hardly evidence of someone who "did all in his power" to lose his case.


This would appear to be evidence that he "did all in his power to lose" (another misquote), and this would appear to be evidence that he wasn't very really truly "quite upset" about it:

"Chuckling and smiling as the counts were read out to him, O'Connell appeared unaffected by the sentence handed down by Judge Henry Wisbey."

That's right; so full of shite is Jim Kerr that I'm prepared to trust the mainstream media over what he heard from another liar on the other side of the globe via telephone the night before O'Connell's sentencing, and by now, the discerning reader should be quite able to understand why.

Those disinformationalists who have been propagating this view: that Brendon set-out to lose his case, will soon be debunked and further exposed as the filthy, lying, traitorous scum that they are. Watch this space.


I'm not sure how Kerr plans to "debunk" something that can't be proven either way. No-one but O'Connell himself can know for sure whether or not he deliberately set out to lose, and why. But when Kerr does release his "exposé", watch this space too. I love tearing up this moron.

I note that you've made a point of avoiding my challenge

Linton thinks that he can duck my challenge simply by issuing a counter-challenge so to create a diversion. But it is Linton who lives just 5-10 minutes walk from the offices of a "rabid Zionist" who Linton himself has acknowledged to be a "major player" in Australia's Jewish lobby, and who is heavily involved with Verint, not I. I at least have the excuse of being located over 9000 miles away from Lieblich's offices. Linton has not. Neither has Steve "Telephone Warrior" Johnson.


Kerr thinks he can duck my challenge simply by changing the subject, but back to it we go. All I've "challenged" Kerr to do is to work for the cause in the same way and with equal commitment and "motivation" to that which he has "challenged" Steve Johnson with (and now that I piped up, me too). Kerr is challenging people to engage in real life activism without being willing to engage in it himself. That's the bottom line. Kerr can not take the bottom any further because we are already here, at the bottom line.

Here are some definitions of the word activist.

  • activism - a policy of taking direct and militant action to achieve a political or social goal;


  • activism - The practice of using action to achieve a result, such as political demonstration or a strike in support of or in opposition to an issue;


  • one who is politically active in the role of a citizen; especially, one who campaigns for change; one who is conspicuously more active in carrying out any occupational or professional functions;


  • activism - the attitude of taking an active part in events, especially in a social context.


  • Kerr can call himself a "webmaster" and a "writer" if he likes, and he can even claim to be a "researcher" (ROTFLOL), but he can't call himself an activist. Not yet. I'm giving him the opportunity, though. I'm serious about paying for half his airfare to Australia to help him expose Steve Lieblich and Verint, and if he takes me up on it I'll even publicly admit that he's earned my respect, because he will have. In fact, I'll drive him back to the airport for his return flight home and shake his hand. Gently, of course (poor bastard's only got one left).

    You won't put yourself on camera, like I have because you're a fat, lazy, ugly one-armed cripple

    Once again, Linton demonstrates that he doesn't believe his own propaganda. Linton in conjunction with "Poseidon" of takeourworldback.com, has been asserting for almost four years that I am "afflicted" by "Narcissistic Personality Disorder". Predictably, the same assertion is now being made against Brendon O'Connell. No doubt this is another claim that Linton will "resolutely" stand by. But if I was "narcissistic", then surely I would be salivating at the prospect of filming myself and uploading the videos to YouTube, would I not? If I were a "narcissist", would I not be unable to resist the prospect of getting myself noticed and possibly admired? Linton either believes his propaganda or he doesn't. For a real example of narcissism we need look no further than Linton himself.......



    I find it amusing that someone who bears a striking resemblance to a monkey would have the cheek to criticise anyone else's physical appearance. But such is James "Handsome" Linton's inherent arrogance and egotism.


    Anyone can purse their lips and make a monkey face -- not everyone can smile normally and look almost identical to Uncle Fester.



    And this photo is just, scary.

    You won't get involved with real-life activism, like I do, because you're a keyboard coward and a pseudo-activist

    Although having picnics in the park with lefties is Linton's idea of "activism", it sure isn't mine. Paying Steve Lieblich a personal visit would be demonstrative of real activism, but Linton hasn't got the bottle to confront the big-fish. He'd much rather be having picnics in the park with the likes of the Socialist Alliance, animal rights groups, and raw food enthusiasts. How brave and noble.


    Okay, so what is your idea of real activism? Paying Steve Lieblich a visit seems to appeal to you, so jump on a plane. And barring that, what are you willing to do for the cause you claim to be so dedicated to? That's a simple question. Please don't shoot back with any of that ridiculous "since I have already told Linton x and he responded with y, we can only conclude that blah-blah-blah-fucking-blah" bullshit. Just drop the facade and be honest for a change, you blithering nonce.

    You're a fucking hypocrite, a total wanker, and you're dumb as shit

    I think not. Linton is the hypocrite. He purports himself to be an "anti-Zionist" and an "activist", and presents himself as an "exposer" of Verint's operations in Australia, but when he is given the opportunity of exposing a key Verint player and an "major player" in Australia's Jewish lobby, Linton all of a sudden becomes inactive and begins issuing diversionary counter-challenges so to create an excuse to avoid confronting Steve Lieblich.


    I've never "presented [myself] as an "exposer" of Verint", as Kerr claims. I looked into O'Connell's claims, did some research, and posted it to a public forum. O'Connell is the one who "presents himself" as the "exposer", and my own assessment of his claims, and the assessment of many others, is that he's full of shit. He's big on story-telling, but there is zero evidence for 98% of his allegations (the Leon Wende Mossad agent claim, Australian Collins Class submarines sabotaged by Israeli intelligence, 'I was poisoned by Jews and suffered a stroke' ['and "they" targeted poisoned my dope plants too'], James Linton is a meth addict and a homosexual [later changed to bisexual when he found out I had a girlfriend], 'bodies are piling up around me because I'm such a threat to Israeli interests', 'I beat up six South African boxers at a night club, etc. etc.). O'Connell is bullshit artist, just like Kerr.

    If you're worth your salt, Kerr, you'll stop issuing stupid "open challenges" and actually do something, other than opportunistically making O'Connell's spot-lit blog a pissing ground for your own personal vendettas, and riding on his coat-tails in the hope that you might garner yourself some credibility

    [Four long-winded paragraphs of his silly response follow, but this one sums up it all up; see the article for the rest if you're interested.] Linton speaks of "personal vendettas", but it is he who has the vendetta, and as you will have already noticed, it's very personal indeed. Linton and I once e-mailed one another. He initiated contact with me in January 2007, but by late April of that year I had decided that I wanted nothing more to do with him and he was duly binned. "Infensus Mentis" went away for a couple of weeks and re-invented himself as "Crimes of Zion" before showing-up at wakeupfromyourslumber.com. That is where and when Linton began his personal vendetta. Now here he is four years later crying like a wee baby because he can't take back what he so readily dishes out. It is oft said that the Jew cries out in pain as he strikes you. Linton is the epitome of that saying. The more one looks at Linton, the more one sees the Jew.


    I've responded to this Orwellian rewriting of history already. See here. As you'll discover, Kerr's behaviour is more reminiscent of "the Jew" than mine could ever be. He's a living, breathing, walking, foot-waggling state of Israel.

    Come out and play, Kerr

    Linton has been posting over on Ryan Dawson's Anti-Neocons forum. As much as he would like to begin a crapfest over there, it's not going to happen. We'll "play" alright, for a little while anyway, but it will be on my terms, not Linton's. I recommend that the reader digests what Linton has written over there because he will be choking on his words in the not-too-distant future, that's for sure.


    He's been saying shit like this for years. Kerr plans to "nuke" me and imagines that I'll come out of it "mortally wounded", but all I ever get hit with are comedy pieces like this one. As I put it in 2007, Kerr's "nukes" are akin to an extremely effeminate gay man storming up to you and macing you with his breath freshener, only to turn around, run off in his stilettos and trip arse-up on a fortuitously placed banana peel. Slightly annoying but utterly hilarious, and a waste of an idiot's time.

    Let's see what you've got

    Linton will soon be seeing what I've got and he isn't going to like it one bit.


    Yes I will. Unless he sends me another photo, I won't like that at all. That shit just isn't funny.

    And instead of refusing to publish my comments like the coward you are, out of fear that the links embedded therein will show you up as an utter fruitcake, here's one last "challenge" for you: nut up and click on publish instead of reject you dumbarse

    Linton complains that I am "refusing" to publish his comments. Not so. His comments have been published. All comments posted on this blog are moderated. That's the way it has always been here, even when Brendon was the administrator and that's the way it is going to stay. Should Linton continue to post here, he'll just have to accept that any comments he leaves will not be published until such times as they have been addressed by me. And should Linton not like the way this blog is operated, that's too bad. He's always welcome to fuck-off and post elsewhere.


    Kerr published my comments approximately 8-10 days after they were submitted, and only after I pointed out the irony and hypocrisy of freedom expression being denied at a blog owned by someone languishing in prison for precisely that. Actually, they were published on the same day (Feb 21) as his response to them was published, which means that he withheld their publication until he could plaster the front page of the O'Connell blog with his 'article' before anyone had a chance to read them. And these comments are the only ones ever to have seen the light of day; I've submitted at least two others that were never published there.

    Here's one last challenge for James "Infested Mouthpiece"/"Chicken of Zion": nut-up and visit Steve Lieblich at his offices you yellow-bellied, mealy-mouthed coward.


    Jump on a plane and I'll hold your camera for you, you one-armed pansy-picking powder-arsed girly-boy.


    Labels: , , ,