IMPEACH Bush
Sign Senator Byrd's petition to look into Bush's conduct Re: wiretapping activities.
It'll only take a minute. It may not work, but it's worth a try and we should support those trying to bring him down.
Thanks blogenfreude, for drawing our attention to it.
posted by qrswave @ Tuesday, February 28, 2006
30 Comments:
Here's the Democratic plan for securing America--
--Giving Ahmadinejad nuclear weapons
--Letting the French have a veto over American security
--Allowing al-queda to make phonecalls into the United States in secrecy
--Giving Iraq to al-Zarqawi, even though people vote more there than they do here.
Even with Americans dissatisfied with the direction the country is moving in, a free people will never trade incompetence for Dhimmitude. The left, which has recently abandoned the stance Truman, Johnson, and Clinton took against totalitarianism, will underachieve again in 2006 and 2008.
this site is neither left nor right
your rhetorical wit is wasted here
q--
When everyone else is weak on security, and the Republicans are the only party strong on security, the Republicans will win every time, no matter how low their approval numbers dip.
Impeachment in this context is useless, especially if the Democrats continue to hemorrhage seats in 2006.
I do agree very much Bush should be Impeached, but let me ask this question to you all.
Who in the name christ do we have to come take this lunitics place? Mcain (please)
What a democrat? they are on the take just as bad as the repubs.
An Independent, who lets hear a name?
Bush@Co., as bad as they are created this mess and I say let them swim in their own filth, besides I kind of enjoy the entertainment of seeing bush squirming on tv.
I woke this morning to see bush giving an interview on good morning america, before my morning coffee (sic) I thought i was still sleeping as in nighmare cause waking and hearing bush's voice non less seeing him made me run and take a quick dump.
Jason H. Bowden is mere stooge for criminals & conspirators, too dumb, for example to understand the Federal Reserve Bank counterfeiting scam, though he obviously thinks he's slick. (Jason wants to make those big bucks, eh?) Real solution is to replace present Senate full of conspirators by means of reversion to original election method: by means of state legislatures. Cong.-man fm Texas, Ron Paul, could serve as interim Pres. in meantime. Any honest investigation will uncover conspiracy including entire establishment, including democrats. Jason Bowden is mere disinfo artist--I wonder what they're paying him? Thor
Jason Bowden,
I am sorry, you simply are speaking nonsense.
The Republicans are "strong" on security? How about the quagmire in Iraq? How about 9/11? Did you read the 9/11 timetable I posted? It was Bush's greatest fuckup. Yet he was voted in again?
Our ports are unsecured, the American Society of Civil Engineers noted this country has worse infrastructure now than ever before, and there are illegal wars in Iraq and Afghanistan which have devolved into utter quagmires.
But sure...Republicans "make us safe!" RA RA America! Um...right...
It is with an eye towards national security that I vote Democrat.
As far as who should be president, I am all for Russ Feingold. Feingold for president!
That said, if Bush is impeached, he would ACTUALLY be replaced by the following, in order...
1) Cheney (vomits)
2) Speaker of the House - Dennis House-tert (sorry, meant Hastert (pukes)
3) Senator Ted Stevens (wretches)
4) Condi Rice
You get my point. It is a parade of horribles that would replace Bush, should he be impeached.
Yeah right, "Miss R"--the "national security" of Israel and Jews is all u care about. Who do u seriously think u're kidding? Thor
Did thor say something?
"oh that's right nothing as usual".
Yawn!
"anon" at 11:43: u wish comrade, u wish. U Jews only fool urselves. Thus by means of magnificent internet (and courageous "bloggers") we continue to successfully draw ur venom, exposing u. Thanks, Thor
Thor --
I wish I could get paid for blogging! :)
Before 9/11, we were all Noam Chomsky. We all thought everyone either acted rationally out of the instinct for greed, or rationally out of the instinct for freedom. The problem is that some don't act rationally at all -- people can be motivated by paranoid conspiracy theories, obsessive hatreds, a longing for a mythical precapitalist past, and a taste for murder and suicide. This happened in Europe during the 1930s, and people thought, "I can't believe anyone is *that* irrational" and didn't act because of fears of another Verdun. Today's situation is similar, except Vietnam is what motivates the calls for inaction.
"Paranoid conspiracy theories"?, "Jason" at 3:36PM. Well do u know how the Federal Reserve Bank operates?--did u know it "lends" "money" (or "funds") which don't exist, which those "bankers" don't possess? "Loan" then shows up on Treasury dept. books as entry for received. Fed then prints "Federal Reserve Notes" on its presses "inflating" and diluting the money supply, effectively taxing the value of money existing previously, including that owned by folks like u and me. Ck "Creature From Jekyll Island" by G. Edward Griffin, or JBS.org.
Did u know then such Fed inflation is then actually COUNTERFEITING by literal definiton of the word? So how do some get to counterfeit, but not others?
So u got CONSPIRACY by definition; such is the nature of our government totally owned by these counterfeiters/conspirators who run the Fed--a bunch of Jews and a few accomplices fm gentiles.
So we got Constitutional crisis, and only real heroes and patriots blog, blog, blog, to inform the people. Thanks for ur input Jason. Thor
The 1930s were a wild party times. But I don't know if Jason knows what the Germans resented Jews for their betrayal (see Belford declaration http://romunov.blogsome.com/2006/01/24/balfour-declaration/ ) of Germany, not because they were Jewish. As Benjamin Freedman puts it in his speech ( http://romunov.blogsome.com/2006/01/02/ex-zionist-benjamin-freedman-speaks-at-the-willard-hotel-washington-dc-in-1961/ ) "... it wasn't that Germans in 1919 discovered that a glass Jewish blood tastes better than Coca-Cola...".
Republicans (and democrats for that matter) are to national security what the Fed is to the fire of inflation, both the arsonists and the firefighters.
Why do you think the fed stopped publishing the M3? so they could print at will and flood the market with dollars IE (COUNTERFEITING) very good Thor.
Thor its about time you actually made some great points in the above post, I commend you. And it all ties in your hatred of jews, you also are correct are goverment is run by jews IE Isreal, but we all new that, so I get it now, you do have your right to hate them (jews) its just the way you presented it in prior post, thank you for clarifying your situation. (for me anyway).
But dont think I agree with your particular racisim, like i said in the past i hate everyone so there is no race card for me :)
Oh and stop calling me a jew! I am as Irish as the come, unless of course the last name Magee! Is of Jewish Decent, not in my family tree HAHAH!
And i will still but your balls if need be!
Nature of Talmudism: Subjectivity, Hubris, Hystericism, Narcissism, Collectivism--Western Antitheses
(Mighty Thor, 2 Mar 06)
Okay "anon," above, at 9:16 and 9:20 AM, but note the pt is what Judaism-Talmudism is all about: it is a war-strategy against gentiles by which Jews uphold themselves as co-equal w. God (but in fact superior, inasmuch as "God" then is obsessed w. them, pursuing them w. lust as male pursues the female, the Judaic people understood collectivistically as this female entity for whom "God" is so "jealous"), with whom God is obligated according to "covenant" by which this inferior God then kills all Jews' enemies. Jew God is a war-God, the twist being this war-God is in an obsessive (psychotic) love relationship w. Jews understood collectivistically, God being Jews' slave.
People need to take this Talmudic license to criminality, conspiracy, lies, and murder seriously. Thus Jews pretend they don't do this criminal conspiracy against fellow Jews--but it's okay against Gentiles. Not only is it "okay"--it is actually God's commandment (as in Book of Samuel whence God punishes King Saul for not totally exterminating all the "Amalekites"), and Jews must carry out this war merely as matter of proper loyalty to their own people and law, "God," and the "covenant."
Check Gosp. JOHN 8:44 where Judaism is identified in one word: SUBJECTIVISM, by which "anything goes," quite literally. Whatever Jews say is true is true, ipso facto, simply as a matter of Talmudic precept. Of course the rabbis must give final approval. Judaism is thus a collectivistic war mentality--hystericism, by its very essence. But this hystericism is so sublime most gentiles cannot even conceive of it in their too trusting imaginations.
Finally, the point is whether the Talmud is this license as I describe or not. Check Michael A. Hoffman II, "Judaism's Strange Gods"; also Ted Pike, "Israel: Our Duty--Our Dilemma."
Note further all Jew behavior (hence history) then CONFIRMS my observations and descriptions given above. Jews, Judaism, and Talmudism simply represent a disease among humanity. It's not "good-evil"--simply the determined nature of reality.
Thus we suffer the Spenglerian "Decline of the West" inasmuch as we tolerate and suffer these criminally insane Jews--which we do, unfortunately, inasmuch as we suffer hubris, pretending to moralism and the child's fallacy of "good-evil" (Pelagian heresy). Note however such insanity of Jews will work among a gentile people who suffer their own hubristic madness (generally, the Pelagian heretical moralism ["good-evil" fallacy-delusion] as of Kant and English Utilitarianism). Removing the Jews and their gentile accomplices will be the resurgence of the Spenglerian "Decline..."--but we'll only be able to do it as we reject hubris and Pelagian heresy.
CONCLUSION: Thus we seek the second Constantinian Christian cultural revolution in the West by which we heed to the true nature of Christianity: ABSOLUTE ANTISEMITISM. Thus we must heed to New Testament Conspiracy theory-analytic-template, by which we identify and remove topmost Judeo-"Sadducean" (as of modern-day, these consisting of Council on Foreign Relations [ck JBS.org] and such as Falwell, Robertson, Limbaugh, O'Reilly, et al.) conspirators. Honest elections and death to the Fed. Thor
Wow, what is funny is that some of what Thor has to say is valid, but it is completely lost in his hatred. Sad, really.
Agreed Miss "R",
Thor see now you went and done it I am totaly lost now, anyway your views are yours and yours only which you are intitled to, man please tell me that is not all typed? has to be a cut and paste job. But I applaud your will, now go take your morning medication while i roll mine. And god bless the united state of america! {AKA} THEY LIVE!
Hatred Is Perfectly Reasonable
(Mighty Thor, 2 Mar 06)
Hey look, "anon" at 10:31, u gotta admit I give u good references. Next we need only examine the proper relation of emotion with overall psychologic health. Hatred can well be reasonable, esp. regarding Jews, enemies of humanity, objectivity, and God. Yes, we don't forget the "Sadducean" accomplices among the gentiles.
"Miss R," the only question is whether hatred is reasonable. Judeo-"Sadduceans" and Jews must be hated in order to be sufficiently opposed, this hatred conceived and balanced in and with reason. Thus the emotion of hate carries and guides the body as the mind directs for conscious planning.
CONCLUSION: Hatred of Jews--and gentile accomplices too--is perfectly reasonable, justified, understandable, and actually, necessary for survival. Yes, the mind's reason must give final approval to all actions, but the emotion of hatred is natural accompaniment rendering most perfect INTEGRATION of body (hence emotion) and soul (including reason). Thor
Thor -- enjoy.
Debunking Federal Reserve Conspiracy Theories
Jason--don't give me a lot of crap, okay comrade. What u must do is to simply state ur thesis, conclusion following premises. Note I've given u references too, but I rely upon specific argumentation presented myself, easily read by u and anyone. So, as I say, don't attempt to load me down with a lot of verbiage: state the argument in ur own words. The Fed is a counterfeiting scam, hence conspiracy by definition, pure and simple, YES OR NO. If u say no, then u gotta say how it isn't COUNTERFEITING. Get a clue, comrade. Thor
Jason, you are trying to actually debate FACTS with Thor? Have you gone mad? Like that is really possible! *laughs pretty hard*
Why don't u answer ur own question, "Miss R"?
Exactly what facts do u think Jason is attempting to "debate"?
Actually Jason is merely resorting to the child's attempt to evade specifics by pointing to a mass of details and pretending his point to be made is "in there somewhere" (among and within a huge mass of otherwise impressive-looking items and material) by which he hopes to confuse the audience and stump his interlocutor. It's like answering the question, "who killed John F. Kennedy?" by pointing to the Warren Report and saying, "it's all explained in there."
Gosh "Miss R," as Jason is now ur hero--will u be marrying him soon? Thor
Jason, your link contains garbage.
The "small amount" of interest that the Federal Reserve banks distribute to their shareholder banks - both FOREIGN and DOMESTIC (not that I give a crap, they're all vultures) - amounts to over $500million annually. That's NOT chump change and it's completely unjustified.
And the idea that the pittance in interest banks pay depositors makes up for the massive counterfeiting scheme they employ is a laugh - ha ha. Moreover, they don't need reserves for savings and preferred money market accounts - only for checking accounts. So, there goes your PhD's silly little theory. Maybe he should have stuck with flipping burgers at McDonalds.
And Kennedy's executive order, had it been implemented, would have put the power to issue money in the Treasury (even if it was simultaneous with the Fed).
Was he killed by bankers? Who the hell knows. The point is he signed something that was decidedly unfavorable to them and a few months later he was terminated. People can draw their own conclusions and God knows the truth. So, it really doesn't matter what we think.
Bottomline: The monetary system is a colossal and VERY obvious scam and your infantile attempts to justify it exposes you as either a fool or an accomplice.
Thank you, QRS.
There are non-nutjob reasons to think the federal reserve system is bogus - and you cited just some of them. :-)
Wow qrswave, u can be down and mean, logical and ruthless--look out Jason, oh u poor fool. Thor
Then to see Thor backing you up...kinda takes the air out of your arguments.
This is the reason i keep no money in the bank, as noted above intrest what intrest, there is non. If you are a member of the 1% club sure there is intrest to be made, but mere mortals such as me( or yourselves i will not catagorise you, you know your own situations) get nothing. So why in gods name would one keep money in a place that can shut its doors and lock you out per Marshal law if needed (hmm did i predict the future)? Banking is for bill paying that is it.
Oh and qrswave Kennedy is doing fine we had coffee this morning :) J/K meds please!
"Miss R" u just need a "leg to stand on," eh? U're just Jew for Jews, that's all--tell us if it isn't true. Thor
Post a Comment
<< Home