"Re: The Final Solution - All Muslims are a threat"
Apparently, my recent post titled Israel’s ‘Final Solution’ to Arabs in South Lebanon was not far off the mark. There are people out there that espouse and advocate the mass murder of not only Arabs in South Lebanon, but of ALL Muslims all over the world.
Re: The Final Solution- All Muslims are a threat is the subject title of a reply posted yesterday on Craig's list - Atlanta, Georgia.
This evidence may be anecdotal and it's pretty obvious that these guys are rabid Zionists - advocating mass murder of Muslim women and children, lying through their teeth about Islam's history, labeling Muslims as suicide bombers, and pimping right-wing Zionist productions like JihadWatch and the movie Obsession. Nevertheless, as you can see, their murderous rhetoric against Muslims has moved up a notch as we move ever closer to the final Clash of Civilizations they've been dreaming about for years now:
I agree with you, but it's something you have to be very careful about saying. I think we need to seriously consider the extermination of Islam on a worldwide basis. And yes, I mean all of them. People recoil in horror at the thought of this, but look at the threat to the civilized world... I didn't come to my decision without a lot of thought. Democracy, globalization, hope, exposure to more western ideas -- I don't think it's going to help with these people. Bush is a dumbass. We've already seen that when they get to vote democratically, they elect Islamic theocrats.All emphasis mine. That's not all I found at Craig's list Atlanta, GA . . .
Yes, the idea of killing so many innocent women and child is awful, BUT we realistically need to start considering what happens if we don't stop Islam while we can.
re: muslim skumBUT, exactly WHO or WHAT do all Muslims "threaten?"Truth -crusades,muslims(what it's all about)Reply to: mailto:pers-209591750@craigslist.org?subject=re:%20muslim%20skum
Date: 2006-09-19, 7:23PM EDT
you're not killing 'innocent' women and children. you are effectively terminating the problem for you are killing a terrorist production factory and a future terrorist. any 'innocent' men who get caught up in it?well, you're just expediting their life's quest: 79 virgins rewarded for martyrdom.
Reply to: mailto:pers-209597280@craigslist.org?subject=Truth%20-crusades,muslims"Innocent" Muslim Children (Dave in Gwinnett)
Date: 2006-09-19, 7:33PM EDT
Doesn’t the present violence, , have its roots in the Crusades’ brutal and unprovoked attacks against a sophisticated and tolerant Muslim world? In other words, aren’t the Crusades really to blame?
Osama bin Laden certainly thinks so. In his various video performances, he never fails to describe the American war against terrorism as a new Crusade against Islam. Ex-president Bill Clinton has also fingered the Crusades as the root cause of the present conflict. In a speech at Georgetown University, he recounted (and embellished) a massacre of Jews after the Crusader conquest of Jerusalem in 1099 and informed his audience that the episode was still bitterly remembered in the Middle East. (Why Islamist terrorists should be upset about the killing of Jews was not explained.) Clinton took a beating on the nation’s editorial pages for wanting so much to blame the United States that he was willing to reach back to the Middle Ages. Yet no one disputed the ex-president’s fundamental premise.
So what is the truth about the Crusades? For starters, the Crusades to the East were in every way defensive wars. They were a direct response to Muslim aggression—an attempt to turn back or defend against Muslim conquests of Christian lands.
Christians in the eleventh century were not paranoid fanatics. Muslims really were gunning for them. While Muslims can be peaceful, Islam was born in war and grew the same way. From the time of Mohammed, the means of Muslim expansion was always the sword. Muslim thought divides the world into two spheres, the Abode of Islam and the Abode of War. Christianity—and for that matter any other non-Muslim religion—has no abode. Christians and Jews can be tolerated within a Muslim state under Muslim rule. But, in traditional Islam, Christian and Jewish states must be destroyed and their lands conquered. When Mohammed was waging war against Mecca in the seventh century, Christianity was the dominant religion of power and wealth. As the faith of the Roman Empire, it spanned the entire Mediterranean, including the Middle East, where it was born. The Christian world, therefore, was a prime target for the earliest caliphs, and it would remain so for Muslim leaders for the next thousand years.
good read at www.crisismagazine.com/april2002/cover.htmRe: Radical Islamic sites......Reply to: mailto:pers-209616119@craigslist.org?subject=%22Innocent%22%20Muslim%20Children
Date: 2006-09-19, 8:19PM EDT
Just remember todays innocent muslim child is tomorrows suicide bomber, and given that they have no aversion to using children as suicide bombers, I meant that literally as well as figuratively. Better their dead children than mine.
Dave the patriotReply to: mailto:pers-209556014@craigslist.org?subject=Re:%20Radical%20Islamic%20sites......
Date: 2006-09-19, 6:09PM EDT
jihadwatch.org...Get a sticker..put it on your car.obsessionthemovie.com (this parallels radical Islam with Nazi Germany)
It's a must see for EVERY FREEDOM LOVING HUMAN BEING.
These people are not kidding......this is the clash of civilizations.......
Now they're threatening to kill the Pope.
Be afraid.....be very very afraid of people with nothing to lose.
Not fully explained to the Western people are that the World’s over 1 billion people of the Islamic faith are all that stands between our most ancient of masters and total control of the World’s entire banking system because of the Muslims refusal to charge INTEREST as their religion deems it an affront to God . . . and which fighters for freedom throughout our history have warned humanity that our greatest threat to freedom lies not in Armies or Empires, but in those that control the banks and money.They call for death to all Muslims, then call themselves "patriots" to obfuscate the TRUTH about who the enemy really is.
This was, perhaps, best articulated by one of the founding fathers of the American Empire, Thomas Jefferson, who warned the future generations of his Nation of the dangers of these ancient monsters by saying:"I believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies. Already they have raised up a monied aristocracy that has set the government at defiance. The issuing power should be taken from the banks and restored to the people to whom it properly belongs."
These are VERY dangerous times. Do not underestimate how ugly it can get if they manage to pull off another false flag and blame it on Iran.
God help us - all hell will break loose.
posted by qrswave @ Wednesday, September 20, 2006
8 Comments:
Hitler would be proud. He would be very, _very_ proud indeed.
People of the western mind do not understand. We do not fear or hate their freedoms. What freedoms. They are slaves to their fears and illusions. We fear for our own freedoms and our right to exist...our very lives. I think a fungus infects the brains of the people and they seem to be quickly losing their ability to rational thought and basic human decency.
The ultimate fight is inevitable.
That is just sick. And I am sure both Hitler and Hitler II (aka Bu$h) would be proud.
And as seer e tazeh said, what freedoms?
akber, if by 'ultimate battle' - you mean between good and evil - I agree.
Interesting commentary on the blood-thirsty mentality of these so-called "patriots".
Today I stood on the spot skimming the pages through National Review (I know, pure right-wing propaganda, but it's a guilty pleasure trip to read for its shrill tone & often twisted historical "facts" to fit their view sometimes) at the magazine rack when the middle-aged man jabbed his finger at the TIME cover art of Mahmoud Ahmjadinejad and sharply shouted something insulting -- "this asshole will get his ass kicked!" to the effect -- indicating his unconditional support for Bush & co to attack Iran. The middle-aged male friends were there at his side. They all look like middle-upper class McCain/Kyl fans judging their casual dress styles.
There are millions of brainwashed jingoistic idiots in USA. They've been had and they will pay with their older children's lives when and if there is a reinstated draft forced on the American people of military age when the war with Iran begins.
The man who jabbed his finger at the inanimate object with considerable force is a true interventionist asshole who is clearly brainwashed by shrill CNN/Fox News/broadcast channel/corporate-owned & published newspaper propaganda drumming the war fever against Iran. Typical of the demented yanks who call for destroying Islamic countries in order to annihilate the Arab population, innocent be damned -- they are the monsters at heart who unknowingly or knowingly appease the Zionist agenda in subduing the Middle East and Central Asia to fulfill its perverted vision of New World Order.
Protocols of the Elders of Zion, despite its questionable authenticity, have fulfilled the points laid out in the little book, regardless of its being a hoax.
Zionism, US Military-Industrial-Govt complex Imperialism and International Banking Cartel are the deadly combination that have selfishly decided to play the God of Fate that put the very existence of the humankind and life itself in grave danger as it may reveal the true colors of ultimate evil in the future.
No, I don't blame the media any more. I do sometimes shift my opinion slightly, and today was one of those days.
First the Pope, then Chavez, then the Ahmedinejad interview, then the Bush speech, then the Clinton interview. Then, I read O'Reilly's interview. O'Reilly is not a cook, Hannity might be.
http://abcnews.go.com/2020/story?id=2465303&page=1
Humanity goes through these paroxysms
What O'Reilly says is true - and Bush's increasing poll numbers show it.
qrswave, the battle for good and evil is fought individually, but also collectively. The collective battle is inevitable now. And I know which side I am now on.
================
In the course of time, however, the Christians could not avoid feeling some respect for the courage, and admiration for the polished manners and advanced civilization of the Saracens,
so much superior to the rudeness and semi-barbarism of Europe at that day.
=================
Charles Murray,
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds,
1841
===================
On the more empirical side, we can point to several influential Arab scientists who made significant contributions to the later development of physics. The eleventh-century al-Haytham sought to introduce a new mathematical and experimental approach to the study of vision and light, and his book Optics was probably the most influential treatise on the subject until Newton's own book of the same title was published 700 years later. Al-Haytham's ideas were developed by Kamal al-Din al-Farisi (d.1320), who used them in a series of experimental studies which demonstrated, among other things, that the rainbow consists of two refractions and a reflection of light within a water droplet. Al-Haytham's work was widely known to the early medieval theologian-scientists, including Bacon, Grosseteste and Theodoric of Freiburg (who independently replicated al-Farisi's rainbow experiment in about 1304). In fact,
the later medieval Europeans often referred in their books to 'our Arab masters'.
===================
Robin Dunbar, The Trouble With Science, 1996, p. 43
===================
"Our Arab masters"....
Speaking of re-writing history, the craiglist links are dead.
Perhaps they were embarrassed?
I hope so.
Post a Comment
<< Home