Supreme Court Rules That No One Owns Their Home
To All,
I hope this finds you well and in good spirit.
Regarding the following, "Either it's your property or it isn't." The hard truth? It isn't. It is not your property. You get "use of." STOP paying your "fee"/property tax and wait to see WHO comes and throws you out of your paid-for home. You may want to research allodial title or "land patent".., IF you can find information on either these days. At one time (8 years ago?) I got a copy (after months of fighting) of the last "land patent" issued on a property I supposedly owned in the state of Oregon. It was signed by President Benjamin Harrison. Correct.., it was a loooong time ago.
Today.., IF you ever pay off your home.., you receive a "color of title". It is NOT "the" title. "The" title is held by the state and the state is in receivership. It is bankrupt. We, have returned to feudalism. You live in the "land of the FEE".., NOT the land of the free as you have been WRONGFULLY taught by the educational system and media in this country. You are indentured slaves.
You can own nothing.., not even your labor. YOUR "governments" have spent and hoodwinked you into a perpetual debt system. EVERY TIME you spend a "dollar" (actually a DEBT instrument that says so right on it's face ; "Federal Reserve NOTE" (please look up "note" in any Black's Law Dictionary)) you are unwittingly increasing the debt and putting that debt on your children and grandchildren. Think not? DO the work. Disprove what you are reading here.
The "witness tracks" are all around us but we haven't been taught how to read them.
Think you "own" your vehicle(s). Think again. Get out your (supposed) "title". In every state it says, "Certificate of Title" on it's face. Yes.., there is a "title" but you will NEVER get it. The state has it and the state is in receivership. It is bankrupt. Ladies and gentlemen.., you are living in an illusion. The whole system is "smoke and mirrors". You are the debtor/slave. And the slave does not say to the master, "do this or that".
Hopefully others will start to grasp the reality of our situation. You are not free. You have NEVER been free, but that is another subject all of it's own.
Hope this is helpful.
LLTF, Roland
Related:
The Day America Died
High Court property decision stirs anger
US Bankruptcy, 1933
The US is a corporation owned by foreign interests
posted by yusuf chun @ Thursday, March 09, 2006
41 Comments:
I guess we never won our independence from Britain after all! Ownership there means a 99 year lease because land and housing actually belongs to the crown.
It's the same in Canada.
It might be true for all commonwealths, present and past.
The Bank of the inner city of London probably holds the deeds. The Rothschild banking cabal seems to own it all.
you said it!
:)
cf: the last link in related.
yeah, that's what they think. The REAL Owner doesn't need a deed.
yeash, thank for reminding me once again of the thin venear we've applied over top reality
The way I see it if the state owns it thay can pay the friggin bill every month also hahaha!
"We pray to the almighty to hold down interest rates that we may partake of the consumer bounty that he has provided. By the sacrifice of our descendants finances, we show our devotion and love for you, o dollar bill, and pray that the godless Asians don't figure out that we are shoveling worthless paper at them until after we shift off this mortal coil and the goverment of these United Social States saves us from our lurking doom. "can I get an Amen."
I have tried to divest myself of the notion of "ownership". For a decade now I have made it my goal to simplify my life and concentrate on things that make me and my family better in a more substantive way. If the whole world goes to shit tomorrow, my transition wont be as traumatic as those who feel the need to have and to control. To many suffer from Affluenza. So yes, it all may be an illusion, but if your state of mind is right, it matters not. I'll always own whats important.
http://server3.pictiger.com/%20img/%20161731/%20picture-hosting/%20colage-2.php
The following link is something you should find of interest. Basically, the Kelo decision has paved the way for some truly frightening "public policy" decisions...
http://oneofcountlessmillions.blogspot.com/2006/03/blight-flight-fright.html
fred,
sorry man, it had to be done. maybe you can pay bakc by doing it to someone else?
this country needs to wake up and move.
choice is between slavery and sovereignity. it's about time America slipped free of colonial rule don't ya think?
being a house-slave ain't all that fantastic, is it? even compared to the field-slave.
America's uncle sam, not uncle tom, or am i wrong?
Point of fact. We are not "slaves," but indentured servants.
I just think that if you are going to use terms, use the correct terms.
hey thx,
coming from an expert such as you. you ought to know.
Major Mordecai Manuel Noah (1785-1851)
He was considered the most distinguished Jewish layman in his time. He was such a prolific proponent of slavery, that the first Black American periodical, The Freedom's Journal, was launched in response to Noah's racist propaganda. He actually defended slavery by calling it liberty:
"There is liberty under the name of slavery. A field negro has his cottage, his wife, and children, his easy task, his little patch of corn and potatoes, his garden and fruit, which are his revenue and property. The house servant has handsome clothing, his luxurious meals, his admitted privacy, a kind master, and an indulgent and frequently fond mistress."
Philadelphia Jewish weekly The Jewish Record of January 23, 1863:
"We know not how to speak in the same breath of the Negro and the Israelite. The very names have startlingly opposite sounds one representing all that is debased and inferior in the hopeless barbarity and heathenism of six thousand years the other, the days when Jehovah conferred on our fathers the glorious equality which led the Eternal to converse with them, and allow them to enjoy the communion of angels. Thus the abandoned fanatics insult the choice of God himself, in endeavoring to reverse the inferiority which he stamped on the African, to make him the compeer, even in bondage, of His chosen people.
"There is no parallel between such races. Humanity from pole to pole would scout such a comparison. The Hebrew was originally free and the charter of his liberty was inspired by his Creator. The Negro was never free and his bondage in Africa was simply duplicated in a milder form when he was imported here....The judicious in all the earth agree that to proclaim the African equal to the surrounding races, would be a farce which would lead the civilized conservatism of the world to denounce the outrage
Rabbi Marc Lee Raphael
"Jews also took an active part in the Dutch colonial slave trade; indeed, the bylaws of the Recife and Mauricia congregations (1648) included an imposta (Jewish tax) of five soldos for each Negro slave a Brazilian Jew purchased from the West Indies Company. Slave auctions were postponed if they fell on a Jewish holiday. In Curacao in the seventeenth century, as well as in the British colonies of Barbados and Jamaica in the eighteenth century, Jewish merchants played a major role in the slave trade. In fact, in all the American colonies, whether French (Martinique), British, or Dutch, Jewish merchants frequently dominated.
"This was no less true on the North American mainland, where during the eighteenth century Jews participated in the 'triangular trade' that brought slaves from Africa to the West Indies and there exchanged them for molasses, which in turn was taken to New England and converted into rum for sale in Africa. Isaac Da Costa of Charleston in the 1750's, David Franks of Philadelphia in the 1760's, and Aaron Lopez of Newport in the late 1760's and early 1770's dominated Jewish slave trading on the American continent."
Martin Luther King, Jr.
"A special and unique relationship to Jews"
When we were working in Chicago, we had numerous rent strikes on the West Side, and it was unfortunately true that, in most instances, the persons we had to conduct these strikes against were Jewish landlords. There was a time when the West Side of Chicago was a Jewish ghetto, and when the Jewish community started moving out into other areas, they still owned the property there, and all of the problems of the landlord came into being.
We were living in a slum apartment owned by a Jew and a number of others, and we had to have a rent strike. We were paying $94 for four run-down, shabby rooms, and we would go out on our open housing marches on Gage Park and other places and we discovered that whites with five sanitary, nice, new rooms, apartments with five rooms, were paying only $78 a month. We were paying 20 percent tax.
The Negro ends up paying a color tax, and this has happened in instances where Negroes actually confronted Jews as the landlord or the storekeeper. The irrational statements that have been made are the result of these confrontations.
Clayborne Carson, ed., The Autobiography of Martin Luther King, Jr. (New York: Warner Books, 1998), p. 309.
The following passages are from Dr. Raphael's book Jews and Judaism in the United States a Documentary History (New York: Behrman House, Inc., Pub, 1983), pp. 14, 23-25.
"Jews also took an active part in the Dutch colonial slave trade; indeed, the bylaws of the Recife and Mauricia congregations (1648) included an imposta (Jewish tax) of five soldos for each Negro slave a Brazilian Jew purchased from the West Indies Company. Slave auctions were postponed if they fell on a Jewish holiday. In Curacao in the seventeenth century, as well as in the British colonies of Barbados and Jamaica in the eighteenth century, Jewish merchants played a major role in the slave trade. In fact, in all the American colonies, whether French (Martinique), British, or Dutch, Jewish merchants frequently dominated.
"This was no less true on the North American mainland, where during the eighteenth century Jews participated in the 'triangular trade' that brought slaves from Africa to the West Indies and there exchanged them for molasses, which in turn was taken to New England and converted into rum for sale in Africa. Isaac Da Costa of Charleston in the 1750's, David Franks of Philadelphia in the 1760's, and Aaron Lopez of Newport in the late 1760's and early 1770's dominated Jewish slave trading on the American continent."
Moses Maimonides
The Encyclopedia of the Jewish Religion refers to Moses Maimonides as "the symbol of the pure and orthodox faith." His Guide to the Perplexed is considered the greatest work of Jewish religious philosophy, but his view of Blacks was ...:
"[T]he Negroes found in the remote South, and those who resemble them from among them that are with us in these climes. The status of those is like that of irrational animals. To my mind they do not have the rank of men, but have among the beings a rank lower than the rank of man but higher than the rank of apes. For they have the external shape and lineaments of a man and a faculty of discernment that is superior to that of the apes."
Arnold Wiznitzer
"The West India Company, which monopolized imports of slaves from Africa, sold slaves at public auctions against cash payment. It happened that cash was mostly in the hands of Jews. The buyers who appeared at the auctions were almost always Jews, and because of this lack of competitors they could buy slaves at low prices. On the other hand, there also was no competition in the selling of the slaves to the plantation owners and other buyers, and most of them purchased on credit payable at the next harvest in sugar. Profits up to 300 percent of the purchase value were often realized with high interest rates....If it happened that the date of such an auction fell on a Jewish holiday the auction had to be postponed. This occurred on Friday, October 21, 1644."
Jews in Colonial Brazil (1960), pp. 72-3; [Note: Wiznitzer, Arnold Aharon, educator; Born in Austria, December 20, 1899; Ph.D., University of Vienna, 1920; Doctor of Hebrew Literature, Jewish Theological Seminary of America; Emeritus research professor, University of Judaism, Los Angeles; Contributor to historical journals in the United States and Brazil including the Journal of Jewish Social Studies and the Publications of the American Jewish Historical Society. Former president, Brazilian-Jewish Institute of Historical Research.]
Seymour B. Liebman
"They came with ships carrying African blacks to be sold as slaves. The traffic in slaves was a royal monopoly, and the Jews were often appointed as agents for the Crown in their sale....[They] were the largest ship chandlers in the entire Caribbean region, where the shipping business was mainly a Jewish enterprise....The ships were not only owned by Jews, but were manned by Jewish crews and sailed under the command of Jewish captains."
New World Jewry 1493-1825: Requiem for the Forgotten (KTAV, New York, 1982), pp. 170, 183. [Liebman is an attorney; LL.B., St. Lawrence University, 1929; M.A. (Latin American history), Mexico City College, 1963; Florida chapter American Jewish Historical Society, 1956-58; Friends of Hebrew University, 1958-59; American Historical Society Contributor to scholarly journals on Jewish history.
Herbert I. Bloom
"The Christian inhabitants [of Brazil] were envious because the Jews owned some of the best plantations in the river valley of Pernambuco and were among the leading slave-holders and slave traders in the colony."1
"Slave trade [sic] was one of the most important Jewish activities here [in Surinam] as elsewhere in the colonies."2
1. , "A Study of Brazilian Jewish History 1623-1654, Based Chiefly Upon the Findings of the Late Samuel Oppenheim," Publications of the American Jewish Historical Society, vol. 33 (1934), p. 63.
2. The Economic Activities of the Jews of Amsterdam in the Seventeenth and Eighteenth Centuries (Port Washington, New York/London: Kennikat Press, 1937), p. 159.
[Bloom is a rabbi; B.A., Columbia University, 1923, Ph.D., 1937; M.H.L., Jewish Institute of Religion, 1928, D.D., 1955; rabbi, Temple Albert, Albuquerque, New Mexico, 1928-31. President Kingston Ministerial Association, 1945-46, and 1959-60; B'nai B'rith; Zionist Organization of America; vice-president, National Prison Chaplain Board, since 1962; Social Action Committee of Central Conference of American Rabbis, since 1947; Author: The Jews of Dutch Brazil, 1936; The Economic Activities of the Jews of Amsterdam, 1937.]
"Israel has become a routine destination for the global trafficking of women," noted Leonard Fein in a 1998 Jewish Bulletin,
"women coerced into prostitution. The thousand such women brought into Israel annually derive principally from the countries of the former Soviet Union, and the way they get to Israel is that they are 'purchased,' each one costing between $10,000 and $20,000. And they are, of course, expected to repay the cost to their masters through what amounts to indentured servitude -- or, if you prefer the simpler and more straightforward, slavery ... Some [are] as young as 15, and even 12 ... Each woman earns between $50,000 and $100,000 for her pimp. The turnover of the prostitution trade in Israel comes to some $450 million a year." [FEIN, 1998, p. 21]
JC,
I have decided you are actually insane.
I was being nice and agreeing with you. I actually said "Great article, and here's more info." I then was tongue in cheek and said we are indentured servants rather than slaves.
And you had to bring in all sorts of anti-Jewish propoganda, trying to rile me up. Why? Why are you delegitimizing all you stand for with this garbage? I am totally baffled.
Are you hoping to provoke me into argument, and force me to defend the Fed Reserve? I really have no idea what you are hoping to achieve.
I did not even mention religion here, and yet you bring it up.
Isn't that counter-productive to your message? Doesn't that make it seem as if being against the Fed is, in fact, anti-Jewish hatred? (when in fact, there are plenty of reasons to be against the Fed that are not related to religion)
Hey folks. Check this out:
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=5255712
She calls this a up and coming dictatorship!
I wish this would get more mainstream media attention
Miss R,
Just because someone
is sayingsomething you
disagree with, does NOT make
it any less true.
It "baffles" my mind, how racist
you can be. Jews (Ashkenazims) are racist to
negros, asian, christians.... yet it's alright
for you. Only when, people point out the
mistakes, and negatives of an "elitist race"
(I used quotes here) do you have issue...
What are you?! An idiot? A bafoon?
Or just a Zionist wannabe?
Anon,
You are making no sense.
I was agreeing with JC, and then he decided to incorporate basically anti-Jewish propoganda just to start an argument.
Of course some Jews are racist. But then again, so is every single group in the entire world.
What does this have to do with the price of tea in China? Why is he mentioning horrible Jewish landlords in connection with the Fed? As if there are not horrible Christian landlords, or horrible Muslim landlords, or horrible Hindu landlords? As if it's a uniquely Jewish phenomenom? HUH???
He is de-legitimizing everything he hopes to say, but tying it to anti-Jewish propoganda.
You are the baffoon here, if you think he makes sense, or is furthering his agenda by stating any of the garbage he just wrote.
So much for..."Life, Liberty And The Pursuit Of Happiness"!
They should have written that we have an In Inalienable Right (the Creator) To Food, Clothing And Shelter!
The American native, Chief Seattle, had it right when he said about the Europeans, "How can anyone own land? How can anyone own the sky? He did, however, believe in personal property.
Communal life, without fiat money, is the way to go. A chosen currency could be developed without the "middle man," that is, corruption (Fed). People also don't shit where they eat, especially if they have the direct right and control of land management and local economics.
Each state should have state constitutional conventions and reconsider/reexamine their relationship to a strong central government, rescind the right to incorporate and banish interest (usury) from the American landscape.
Just to mention a few things.
Land ownership is very peculiar. No one ever owns land - in other words it belongs to Nature(God). The reason behind it is its immobility. In French, the real estate business is termed "immeuble" something.
If I own a china cup, I can break it or I can drink tea in it or I can take it into my grave. Land stays where it is. Electricity, water,gas lines have easements on my land. If my land is by a river, and my neighbour has no way to get to the river except through my land, she has a RIGHT on my land to use it to pass through it. Wildlife, narcotics, agricultural, water and zoning officers have full right to tell me how to use my land. If my land is not being used for extended period, it can be given to someone who is using it (squatter rights). And the list goes on and on. If a person is married, my spouse has an automatic joint right in the primary residence land/house
regardless whether his/her name is on the title. At my death, the land has to be sold and/or probated, and possibly goes back to the Sovereign.
The above is for a "fee simple" owner. Now you can see why alloidal title is almost impossible. Leaseholds, condominium etc. etc. complicate the picture even further. There are enough lawyers on this forum so I should not make more of a fool of myself. But the summary is that no one OWNS land in the way one owns a sofa or a book or a cup.
Property does not appreciate - population increase and low interest rates (affordability) and interest (inflation) drive up the price. So, it is an attractive investment to buy some RIGHTS to a piece of land - you can never buy the land itself.
Akber,
Wow. Another pearl. I am serious, I would love to read any book you would write. You have lots of wisdom to impart to the world.
And I took Property law - you are correct in your characterization.
akber,
yr right and yr not right. i mean i realize land ownership is a construct, much as social guideline/laws, and that it's a construct built upon consent. but, and that's a big one, this republic was built on a construct that included land ownership, which is proven by the title or deed.
now, the state or gov, by passing a law has sold the country and all it holds: including its citizens to a bank. the state then files bankruptcy, dissolves all private ownership, and is in receivership of all that once was held by its people.
and the state with a monopoly on the use of violence can enforce the laws it passed in which the people had no say, and turn them into slaves.
that's the big problem here. we're owned and not only us, but for generations to come. we have become the property of the bank!
and very few people seem to be bothered. they're at superbowl sunday excercising their right to free speech or whatever.
drac,
interesting link. wish i could hear it though. anyone have a transcipt?
I actually have a transcript.
Sandra Day O'Connor totally rocked today.
http://www.pnionline.com/dnblog/attytood/archives/002903.html
Good stuff.
Whops, that is only a transcript of Nina Totenberg of NPR. Evidently, no transcript of the actual speech is available at this time.
Akbar,
An interesting study showed, a friend of mine claimed, that when people live in a stable economic environment, especially where simple effective technology is used, population growth actually diminishes.
Do you know of any such studies?
I remember him referring to India. He said that observations made by French and English colonialist suggested a stable society. When the English won the war with France, over control of the Indian continent, the English began pushing people off their land and putting them on the road. It was noticed that within the coming years a sharp increase in the population was evident. When he told me this I was thinking about my own Irish ethnic history and heritage and realized that the Irish population grew tremendously during the Industrial Revolution. Both Irish and Scottish people were forced into London and other large cities. Thus Malthus and his feeble attempt in understanding population growth was one of the first economist to study the issue.
Is having children, an unconscious or instinctual drive, or one way to increase the survival of the folk?
Are there any studies that might validate his (my friends) statements?
Thanks for any info.
Jc, come on over to my place and bump my ttbl status...
wilco,
semper fi
hey fred,
u shld do something on pat tillman. guy had three closely grouped shots to the head in a firefight?
doesn't hold water.
oh, and it tried to vote. heck is the name of yr blog on those lists?
"hey fred,
u shld do something on pat tillman. guy had three closely grouped shots to the head in a firefight?
doesn't hold water."
You heard about him being against the Iraq War? I guess he was supposed to meet Noam Chomsky after his Afghan tour, since he was a Chomsky fan..
http://www.thenation.com/doc/20051024/zirin
anon,
yeah, heard about that. thx for the link. i'm a look into it.
i get the feeling some had him killed.
*someone
citizen slave,
There are many studies on Malthus' work.
The last book I was reading, "Collaps", applies Malthus to the Rwandan genocide quite successfully.
However, it is equally apparent that personal security (rule of law, retirement, unemployment, etc.) leads to population decline - as in many European countries. Food availability (premise of Malthus) does not play a role.
So, obviously, it is more complex than simple food availability.
akber,
Thanks for the tip.
Post a Comment
<< Home