< HOME  Wednesday, July 26, 2006

Only Israel is Sovereign: Iraqi PM cannot have opinion

Colonialists, especially of the Angl0-Saxon and Teutonic-Zionist varieties, depend upon local stooges to carry out their nefarious occupations. Here is what happened to one, the curent Prime Minister of Iraq in Washington, DC. Do not be disappointed if this leads you to think that the US does not recognize free speech or sovereignty any more. Those are anti-Zionist concepts.

The Arab calls for immediate cease-fire created complications for President Bush yesterday when he hosted Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki, who urged a cease-fire at a press conference with Bush.

Maliki, who has been quoted as blaming "Israeli aggression" for the conflict, ducked a question asking him to clarify his own view of Hezbollah.

That prompted demands from Democratic lawmakers for Maliki to be disinvited from his speech today to a joint session of Congress - demands rejected by Republican leaders who control Congress.

"What side is he on? Iraq is supposed to be our great ally. Well, what the heck are we doing if the prime minister, who's supposed to be an ally, refuses to condemn Hezbollah?" fumed Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.). Schumer vowed to boycott today's session and a number of other Democrats say they'll also snub the speech, raising questions about whether the hall will be embarrassingly empty.

Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton (D-N.Y.) said it was "disappointing" that Maliki didn't take the chance to condemn Hezbollah but said she'll go to today's Maliki speech.

Rep. Nita Lowey (D-Westchester) said Maliki knows the cost of terror in Iraq and "should know better than to condemn another sovereign nation for defending itself."

6 Comments:

At Wednesday, July 26, 2006, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Clinton, Schumer: Absurdity's Reductions
(Mighty Thor, 26 July 06)

What an interesting charade: the Israelis are now posed as the "(neo-) conservatives" and "good cops" while mass-corporate "Jews-media" poses the United Nations and "international community" as the more democratic do-gooders against the Jew-Israelis as criminals. Hillary says "tut-tut."

Hey, is Hillary Clinton funny or what?--first she says we're all "Israelis" (indeed--slaughtering and annihilating at will), then says, well golly gee whiz, okay, I'll still go to ur speech to show how "mighty white" I can be. The Clintons: heroes of queers, like the Kennedys were heroes to the Catholics.

Thus we observe the "divine comedy" so brilliantly scripted by the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR--see TheNewAmerican.com for more conspiratorial expo).

Meantime the free internet continues to operate producing that acid-like INFORMATION: facts are such stupid, stubborn things, u see.

All we need are enough people in the state capitals to agree w. Bill Benson of TheLawThatNeverWas.com that 16th and 17th Amendments (so-called) WERE ACTUALLY NEVER RATIFIED.

Hillary Clinton and Charles Schumer?--they're just the most amazing imposters and charlatans, aren't they?--who do they really fool? Honest elections and death to the Fed. Thor

 
At Wednesday, July 26, 2006, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Those democrats disappoint me but then again they are the same as republicans. Hilary does not speak for me. It is a shame they want to protest Maliki's speech...but why? hes saying the truth.

As an American i do not support Israel at all. Death to them!

 
At Wednesday, July 26, 2006, Anonymous Anonymous said...

democrates/republicans - no difference , the US is effectivwly a 1 party state. There nearly all
in the pocket of AIPAC/big businesses. They put Isreal 1st, 2nd and 3rd.

 
At Wednesday, July 26, 2006, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Too bad most americans are going to vote for these people again. Were going to be in this mess for a very long time. Especially with the rumors of Hilary being in the presidential elections there is no doubt the blind patriots will vote for this BITCH.

EXPOSE THE NEOCONS!

 
At Wednesday, July 26, 2006, Blogger Undeniable Liberal said...

Bad Iraqi....he should know by now that the definition of defending one's country equals slaughtering civilians.

 
At Wednesday, July 26, 2006, Blogger qrswave said...

Do you believe that bastard, Schumer, had the nerve to say that after sacrificing all those soldiers' lives (for oil) and spending all those billions of dollars, Maliki "owes" it to the US to support its objectives, i.e., Israel's objectives?

Unbelievable! They have zero respect for Maliki. They think they bought him.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home