posted by qrswave @ Monday, September 18, 2006
If I watched this once, I watched it a thousand times...mostly the segment that shows the approach and penetration of the "plane". If you just toy around with this in full screen mode, starting and then stopping in rapid bursts, it's very easy to see the image of the so called "plane" fragmenting very badly into sections that can't be attributed to jerks in the film if you follow the continuity of motion of the smoke. Since this clip appears to be very clean, with the enhancement of a clear audio track,( which you can also follow for continuity ), it becomes another prime example in a whole emerging array of visual discrepancies for the South Tower hit. This also bolsters the idea that what you are seeing is what the camera is seeing, which can only be, in effect, a projected image ( I won't say hologram, so I don't get my ass chewed ) or shall we say "cloak" over what can only be some form of DU tipped cruise missile, to penetrate cold steel through the entire structure and exit the other side, with no visible outside fragmentation of an aluminum "airliner" at impact. All of which is thoroughly within the scope of present day stealth militech. So this is a nice, new, fresh look at the whole stupid Hollywood Does the Hell Drivers Production, before all the media manipulators ever got their slimy hands on it, and computer faked all the mainstream TV imagery. Please see "Fooled Again on 9-11" at YouTube. Great ride, Great song. Watched it over and over on 9-11-06, just to celebrate- THE TRUTH WILL SET US FREE ! WE WON'T BE FOOLED AGAIN !
can someone put this on google video, my workplace has blocked youtube. thanks
The "new" video (direct link to divX avi version extracted and uploaded to my local indymedia, for Dirk - 1.5Mb) is old footage that has been color-enhanced and reduced by compression algorithm (using an antiquated and redundant 256 color pallete for video)-- and it tells us nothing new.The no-planes-at-WTC hypothesis was first presented to me by the same Gerard Holmgren who was responsible for this letter to Jared Israel:======================= "I'm Unimpressed with Attempts to Link Israel and 9-11"- Gerard Holmgren=======================But I never drink muddy water.
IMHO,Each broken column and shredded window on the damage profiles of the towers while they were still standing show damage consistent with a plane.If the planes were holograms, what kind of explosive expertise and direction is needed to produce the exact damage. Any ideas?If it was holograms, then maybe the towers are still standing, and we have a blue-sky hologram to make us believe that they have fallen. After all, we have not passed our hands through the thin air ourselves.Again, IMHO, the hologram stuff discredits the rest of the Truth 9/11 movement.
I, too, find the no-planes-theory hard to believe.The most important thing to emphasize is the miraculous way those three colossal buildings came down.
The 'no-planes' theory has been hyped up by the government so they can claim all 9-11 truth movements are bonkers.Focus on the real issues and not this bs they manufactured.
No plan F-Tards!!! Psyops, well poisoning uber-trolls. Shills like quasimodo need to be exposed as operatives.
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
At least psyoptical, well-poisoning, uber-trollic shill operatives like Quasimodo know how to spell PLANE and FUCKTARD. And he never said (HOLOGRAM) either, so he wouldn't get his ass chewed ...remember, FARTARD ? If you can't even spell, how can you be expected to read, much less understand anything ? How's that for EXPOSITION, MAJOR ? And the NO-PLANES THEORY is nowhere near as ridiculous as the one YOUR GOVERNMENT IS PROMOTING. Why don't we just call that what it really is... a FUCKTARD CONSPIRACY THEORY.
alreadypublished:Do you know where I could get a copy of the original?Thanks!
To create a such kind of article is really amazing,I daily read your blogs and give my announcement for that here this article is too great and so entertaining. Judi Online
Post a Comment