< HOME  Monday, September 18, 2006

Incredible closeup footage of 2nd plane hitting



I know I've never seen it before. What about you?

4 Comments:

At Tuesday, September 19, 2006, Blogger AlreadyPublished said...

The "new" video (direct link to divX avi version extracted and uploaded to my local indymedia, for Dirk - 1.5Mb) is old footage that has been color-enhanced and reduced by compression algorithm (using an antiquated and redundant 256 color pallete for video)-- and it tells us nothing new.

The no-planes-at-WTC hypothesis was first presented to me by the same Gerard Holmgren who was responsible for this letter to Jared Israel:
=======================
"I'm Unimpressed with Attempts to Link Israel and 9-11"
- Gerard Holmgren
=======================

But I never drink muddy water.

 
At Tuesday, September 19, 2006, Blogger Unknown said...

IMHO,

Each broken column and shredded window on the damage profiles of the towers while they were still standing show damage consistent with a plane.

If the planes were holograms, what kind of explosive expertise and direction is needed to produce the exact damage. Any ideas?

If it was holograms, then maybe the towers are still standing, and we have a blue-sky hologram to make us believe that they have fallen. After all, we have not passed our hands through the thin air ourselves.

Again, IMHO, the hologram stuff discredits the rest of the Truth 9/11 movement.

 
At Tuesday, September 19, 2006, Blogger qrswave said...

I, too, find the no-planes-theory hard to believe.

The most important thing to emphasize is the miraculous way those three colossal buildings came down.

 
At Monday, January 06, 2014, Blogger Fastbet said...

To create a such kind of article is really amazing,I daily read your blogs and give my announcement for that here this article is too great and so entertaining. Judi Online

 

Post a Comment

<< Home