< HOME  Sunday, August 30, 2009

Inglourious Basterds a "Jewish Wet Dream"

Over the last year or so, there have been countless movies about the Nazis and the Holocaust, such as the “The Reader,” “Valkyrie,” “Defiance” and “The Boy in the Striped Pajamas.” A popular new film, the "Inglourious Basterds" directed by Quentin Tarantino and produced by the Weinstein brothers is promoted by Hollywood and the press as a fictional tale of a group of Jewish American GI's led by a redneck Lieutenant played by Brad Pitt, who seek vengence against the Nazi's in occupied France during WWII. Throughout the film there are many gruesome scenes of vengence, including scalpings and torture.

Eli Roth, who plays a leading role in the film as the "Bear Jew", says that the idea of vengence is "...almost a deep sexual satisfaction of wanting to beat Nazis to death, an orgasmic feeling. My character gets to beat Nazis to death. That’s something I could watch all day. My parents are very strong about Holocaust education.” On a similar note, one of the films producers, Lawrence Bender told Tarantino that “As your producing partner, I thank you, and as a member of the Jewish tribe, I thank you, motherf--ker, because this movie is a f--king Jewish wet dream.”

In the ADL Statement they say that the film "...is an allegory about good and evil and the no-holds barred efforts to defeat the evil personified by Hitler, his henchmen, and his Nazi regime. If only it were true!"

There is no need to come up with a fictional story while there is a true chapter of WWII history most people have no clue about. A Jewish American Author named John Sack risked his career and even his life to tell the story of Jews who sought revenge in his controversial book An Eye for an Eye: The Untold Story of Jewish Revenge Against Germans in 1945. The story tells of Jews who oversaw prison camps in Poland under the Communist occupations. According to Sack, they not only sought revenge against German soldiers, but also innocent German and Polish civilians.

Sack states in his book that the revenge included torture and rape of women and children. Sack estimates 60-80,000 died in these camps. Sack interviewed one survivor named Lola, who was an official at the prison and lost most of her family in the Holocaust. She admited that they treated the prisoners much worse than she was treated at Auschwitz by the Nazis. She told Sack "thank God, nobody tried to rape us. The Germans weren't allowed to." "....but all of that happened to German girls at Lola's prison in Gleiwitz," said Sack.

Solomon Morel who lost most of his family in the holocaust brutally oversaw the prison camp. Morel fled to Israel after the book was published. Israel has refused to extradite Morel to Poland to face war crimes.

Most major publishers refused to publish Sack's book and major media outlets ignored it once it was published. John Sack was villified by the Jewish Establishment, such as the Executive Director of the World Jewish Congress. He was labeled a self-hating Jew and even an anti-semite. Self Proclaimed fighter of Holocaust Denial, Deborah Lipstadt, stated, on "the Charlie Rose Show" that Sack was a Neo-Nazi and anti-semite and told him personally he was worse than a holocaust denier, despite the fact that he shares the mainstream view of the holocaust.

The media and major Jewish organizations were opposed to the book because they percieved it as portraying Jews in a negative light, possibly stirring up anti-semitism and weakening their power to exploit the tragedies commited by the Nazi's for their own political agenda. However these same organizations are promoting Tarantino's fictional film.

Sack's message from his book was not to promote hatred against Jews. Instead, the books purpose was to prove that Jews are no different from any other group of people who have suffered from persecution but aren't immune from committing autrocities against others.

Behind an Eye for An Eye: Revenge, Hate and History by John Sack

http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v20/v20n1p-9_Sack.html


Source: Examiner.Com

5 Comments:

At Sunday, August 30, 2009, Blogger Musique said...

When papi-in-law, Jon Voight is the ultimate disgusting puppet tool of the bitchraeli/zionist movement

On June 8, 2009, / Voight hosted a Republican congressional fundraiser, and he also made his own speech within the event. He criticized President Barack Obama and described his most pressing concern to be for Israel's safety, stating that he believed the Palestinian peoples' only agenda to be wiping Israel off the map.[13] Senator Mitch McConnell of Kentucky and former House Speaker Newt Gingrich praised Voight's speech.[14] McConnell told Voight about his speech: "I really enjoyed that."

I am wondering how long will it take for Brad to follow the same path. Heyy! You can always make your diarrhea opps dream come true by starring in a hollowcrapp© related movie!

COZ, your “best pal” Brendon lost his marbles again over you in this
video, have you seen it?

 
At Sunday, August 30, 2009, Blogger Behan said...

Of course what they seem to forget is that in all probability Hitler was the illegitimate child of Salomon Mayer Rothchild...which would explain why the Nazi movement was partially funded by
Rothchild blood money.

So in effect- when Jews desire to beat up Nazis they really are going against their own relatives.

 
At Sunday, August 30, 2009, Blogger Greg Bacon said...

If the current pace of holoco$t brainwashing keeps up, in two generations, the history books will be filled with fiction tales of how the Jews won WWII and the Allied armies only supplied clerks and drivers.

 
At Sunday, August 30, 2009, Blogger andie531 said...

This comment has been removed by the author.

 
At Monday, August 31, 2009, Blogger Infensus Mentis said...

LOL Greg.

Thanks Musique, I hadn't seen it. I haven't had any time for the Internet lately, too busy.

O'Connell is the classic turd in the punchbowl, a major liability to the cause. In one breath he denounces people like Mike Delaney for being extremists, and in the next he advocates "internment camps" for Jews. Yeah, very helpful bro, thanks a lot.

The usual disinfo is still being peddled - drug addict, drug dealer, Jew etc - but someone pointed out recently that he now believes I'm tapping his phone. This is a comment from his Youtube channel:

"The poster "Crimes Of Zion" (James Linton) has produced a parody of myself which includes situations that he could ONLY know about from having access to my private phone conversations. I recently visited him again. He decided to hide inside his house. James Linton stated he could have people "found" due to his relationship with a next door neighbour called "Gary" who works for the Australian Federal Police. I confronted "Gary" at his house ON CAMERA. Wait for the video.

James Linton is a jew who lives right near the 2 main synagogues in Perth. He has access to my private phone calls. Jews/Israeli's run the local and national police communication intercept hardware.

Work it out."

This is the 'parody' video he is referring to.

So now his angle is that I'm a drug-dealing, drug-injecting Jew who is somehow able to listen in to his private phone conversations. A meth-addicted, drug-peddling intelligence asset. ROFL.

This is no surprise though, since O'Connell also believes that he is being followed everywhere he goes (watch "Fresh Fruits - Morning Glory" parts 1 and 2 at his Youtube channel) and that people are hiding in his roof. His words, not mine. In the video, a guy in the park leaning against a tree and reading a book is made out to be someone tailing him, watching his every move. A caption pops up saying something like, 'This person left immediately after I started filming him'. The dude is off his trolley.

I've been checking his channel every now and then for the footage of his latest "visit" to my house, which I heard about through my understandably pissed off neighbour about a month ago, but nothing has thus far been uploaded. He came over on a Saturday afternoon when no-one was home, but as you can see by his comment above, he obviously intends to make out that I was "hiding" inside. It's hard to tell his lies from his delusions anymore. Fucking tripper.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home