Jackie Kennedy's Half Brother Indicted for Kiddie Porn
PORTLAND, Ore. — The half brother to Jacqueline Kennedy Onassis has been indicted on felony charges of encouraging child sexual abuse in Oregon.James Auchincloss was indicted by a Jackson County grand jury in Medford on 25 counts of abuse resulting from the alleged duplication and possession of images of child pornography.
A co-defendant, Dennis Lee Vickoren, was indicted on 30 separate felony counts of encouraging child sexual abuse.
The Jackson County district attorney's office says an arraignment has not yet been scheduled.
A message left for Auchincloss' attorney, Carl Caplan of Medford, was not immediately returned.
posted by andie531 @ Thursday, August 27, 2009
16 Comments:
Pedophilia is rampant up in those levels of society. If anyone has ever read the stories and histories of Kathy O'Brien or Svali or Brice or Cisco Wheeler, you will learn just how deeply it is integrated into the highest levels.
When you read of Bush Daddy and Cheney and the things they do to a young mother and her 3 year old for kicks... Or the Byrds of the east Coast... Robert Byrd was/is quite the slaver... Or the franklin Case a few decades ago... or the events that Michael Aquino was involved in... he who is in charge of Psych ops in the Pentagon...
Anyone wants urls I got em. A lot of this is due to satanism and dark magic, part of it just perversion, so many different reasons.
There's also a lot of alcohol/drug use involved if you recall O'Brien - Cheney and Bush Sr. were clearly addicts.
The average felon, like gang members, are close to 100% substance abusers. Just look at any crime story and there is usually addiction involved.
Add an elitist ideology to the general pattern (here at http://www.10547.info/thorburn/tsari.html) and you've got trouble.
.
I wonder what the addiction levels in the general population are, and where's the imaginary line between use and abuse?
Were addictive candies illegal, the jails would be full of chemical eatin' TV addicted losers.
100% is a gross exaggeration.
I wonder what the addiction levels in the general population are, and where's the imaginary line between use and abuse?
10%. There is no "imaginary line". Most people can use without abusing. Addicts can't.
100% is a gross exaggeration.
Not regarding felons or gang bangers. It's pretty close in any case.
.
Oh bullshitter oracle orifice andie, how much can someone drink or use before they become an addict, by your scale of estimation?
The numbers are pretty bad for addicts in jail, but consider that prohibition is a major reason for this.
Perhaps next, you wish to excuse your khazar kin for all their crimes, because they are alcoholic bastards?
Funny, they're the least jailed bunch around.
Prohibition? Oh, please. Like they can't find it.
If you're going to go down the road that some groups are naturally evil, without ruling out addiction, then you are heading down the path of racism - e.g. this article: http://curtmaynardsnewestblog.blogspot.com/2009/08/12-year-old-nigger-demarco-harris.html
I have a problem with that, because it demonizes blacks as natural criminals, without noting the propensity they have for addiction, which is something on the level of Native Americans. And that causes a lot of behavioral problems.
There's plenty of addiction with Jews, and in particular Israelis -http://www.jweekly.com/article/full/2280/israeli-police-are-eyeing-massive-drug-parties-in-india/
It's not the entire picture.
It does have to be taken into consideration when making any judgment as being an addict can drastically alter behavior.
The name calling does not bolster your (lack of an ) argument.
.
Prohibition of drugs, complete with jail terms, easily doubling the prison population, you obfuscating hypocrite.
I knew that's where you were going, maybe it's in their DNA.
You still haven't explained how the genetic resistance to alcohol, or lack thereof, causes people to hoard things.
You were also wrong about suing for libel, when you said that it's okay to curse people over their graves, because their estates can still sue.
I wonder what the addiction levels in the general population are, and where's the imaginary line between use and abuse?
From past personal experience, I'd say that line is crossed when you start lying and stealing to feed your habit.
Relationships, family, friends don't matter, the only thing you need is that next hit.
interesting...
So, when people stare like zombies at the TV, and start regurgitating the lies and stealing to support their learned materialism, that would definately qualify them as addicts, right?
;)
So, when people stare like zombies at the TV, and start regurgitating the lies and stealing to support their learned materialism, that would definately qualify them as addicts, right?
Even dumber than usual today, eh?
You were also wrong about suing for libel...because their estates can still sue.
"As a rule, you cannot defame the dead. Under the law, the right to not be defamed is a personal right – only the person in question can sue for defamation. Therefore, a family member cannot bring a claim against you." http://www.filmindependent.org/content/legal-ease-it-possible-defame-dead
You still haven't explained how the genetic resistance to alcohol, or lack thereof, causes people to hoard things.
You haven't done any reading on addiction or OCD. Yeah, I'm sure those poor sots you see in urban areas pushing shopping carts full of dirty, unusable found objects are just rampant materialists.
Is your "functionally-illiterate ignoramus" persona designed to make this blog look bad?
I knew that's where you were going, maybe it's in their DNA.
Addiction always must be ruled out first. Otherwise you end up demonizing based on race, like Maynard's article. This is not a road anyone needs to go down.
The main problem with Jewish culture is that it is tribal. Many cultures practice tribalism. However, Jewish tribalism includes "world domination" ideology, which is generally problematic (and that's an understatement).
.
you're the one who suggested the DNA theory, in relation to addiction, materialism and hoarding.
you can be sued for damages by the estate of a dead person, and just because it's easier to defame the dead, doesn't make it right, or the allegations true.
you don't like the TV zombie addict theory? perhaps it is the main cause of rampant materialism, due to the synagogue of satan's messages being widely disseminated.
go worship your idol, talk to the toilet.
You're hopeless.
.
.saieth andie's reflection
gurgle gurgle, smack smack
Why don't you write a story on how Tourette's is caused by all the vulgarity in the media so we can have a good laugh.
LOL
Post a Comment
<< Home