< HOME  Wednesday, July 26, 2006

Fox News, Gingrich and World War III

Fox's pitiful charade that is labelled as 'news' is in high gear again, dumbing down and twisting as only a true believer can do. Newt Gingrich has announced World War III and asked to remove Condi for 'being too light on Israel'.

Israeli Ambassador continues to lie and mislead. Any doubts what the real agenda is here? Folks, so many intelligent people are not deluded. The agenda is world hegemony, which is not bad in itself and which all empires have wanted. Enjoy:
On Monday night, FNC's Greta Van Susteren invited Israel ambassador Daniel Ayalon on the show for one of the cable channel's signature, simplistic and patently dishonest discussions about Middle East turmoil; turmoil that has waged for the better part of a half-a-century and been rooted in deep religious, political and geographical conflicts that have reeked havoc inside Israel as well as accounted for untold damage to Israel's Arab neighbors. Van Susteren cut to the chase: "Why do they hate you so much" she asked. In respone, Ayalon told Van Suteren Islamic radicals wanted to use the Middle East as a springboard to turn America into an Islamic country, that Israel's sweeping military attack on Lebanon was for the Lebanon's own good, and that Arabs have been "brain washed."

9 Comments:

At Wednesday, July 26, 2006, Blogger Undeniable Liberal said...

You know, qrswave, I've had it with all this bullshit. I'm tired of hearing about the hordes of evil brown-skinned islamofacists wanting to take over the world, when it's America and thier NWO cronies who want to do it. Anybody who resists is a "terrorist". Sad thing is, the sheeple are swallowing it.
We are being set-up, big time for some big false-flag operation, probably involving Iran, and we won't have a choice but to jump in and defend freedom, liberty, and jingoism.
God help us all.....

 
At Wednesday, July 26, 2006, Blogger Undeniable Liberal said...

Ooops, sorry Akber. Great post, by the way.

 
At Wednesday, July 26, 2006, Anonymous Anonymous said...

This is another example of Zionist controlled psycho-babble for America's dumbdowned. Most of them will accept this tirade as the God's truth, the same way that they accept the elaborately contrived "war on terror". When will Americans realize the plain truth - somethin' ain't right!

 
At Wednesday, July 26, 2006, Anonymous Anonymous said...

The poll reported by AFP (Agence France Presse) is more detailed here. From dr Abu Khalil's website.

So what do the Lebanese people really think? Now that there are American Zionists who regularly speak on behalf of the Lebanese people, now that I have seen Bush-Rice-Bolton speak about what the people of Lebanon need, as well as officials in Israel and now that some Lebanese mercenaries and war criminals, such as the Druze and Philangists have been anointed to speak on behalf of Lebanon. The prognosis for Lebanon in the larger scheme of hegemony in reference to Hizballah has always centered on the opinion of the Lebanese people.

The deliberate and methodological Israeli bombing campaign has specifically, sought to distance the Lebanese population from Hizballah. To a great extent, the success of the war on Lebanon depended upon its occurrence. This prescription for a new Middle East, as all the evidence seem to suggest, that it has been planned for up to a year or more prior to the fateful events on July 12, 2006. As Hassan Nasrallah pointed out during his last Al Jazeera TV interview, propaganda (the battle for the hearts and minds if you will) is a very important component of this war. The USA and Israel must have realized not only are the Lebanese Armed Forces too weak to confront Hizballah, many of the members of the forces are Shi'a who would not take up arms against their brethren.

Therefore, the only avenue left to the hegemonic forces was the people. The plan was to make them so desperate utterly distraught that there would be a total and complete public outcry against the Hizb for putting them in this predicament. So targets in Lebanon included Druze, Christian, Sunni, Palestinian, Amal, and of course Shi'a neighborhoods. Any and all targets that would depress and oppress the people toward outrage were hit; milk factories, temples, mosques, TV stations, electricity plants, hospitals, farms, banks and so on.

However, we have at least a survey of Lebanese public opinion, which instructs on the opinions of the Lebanese in reference to the War. It was conducted by the reliable Markaz Bayrut li-l-Abhath. These are some of the highlights of the study: 70% support the capture of the two Israeli soldiers (73.1 among Sunnis, 96.3 among Shi`ites, 40% among Druzes, and 55 among Christians); 87% support that "the resistance fight Israeli aggression on Lebanon" (88.9 among Sunnis, 96.3 among Shi`ites, 80% among Druzes, and 80% among Christians); 8% think that America adopted a positive position toward Lebanon during this war (7.9% among Sunnis, 4 among Shi`ites, 13.6 among Druzes, and 15 among Christians).

Sample size is 800. The overwhelming majority were face- to -face interviews including all displaced individuals.

All plans calling for the annihilation of Hizballah must now go on the back burner or back to the drawing board and give ACME a quick call for a refund, because there in no public support for it in Lebanon. The plan was bound to falter considering also that the Hizb is a well organized guerilla movement with a very effective political wing. It is not going to go away. Hizballah is an idea, it is a yearning for self-determination and it is a self expression of the Shi'a majority in Lebanon. The hegemonists will have to regroup, negotiate and try another scheme.

 
At Wednesday, July 26, 2006, Anonymous Anonymous said...

I wonder if Israel really expected the Lebanese to totally denounce Hezbollah? This organization had been the only force capable of resisting Zionist Israel's incursions into Lebanon. I'm not a political or military historian, but isn't this the old "divide and conquer" strategy.

 
At Wednesday, July 26, 2006, Blogger qrswave said...

"70% support the capture of the two Israeli soldiers ... 87% support that "the resistance fight Israeli aggression on Lebanon"

Of course.

Lies are not only Israel's deadliest weapon, but they are also their biggest export.

Literally everything they do is based on lies.

I don't believe a word that comes out of their mouths unless it's independently verified.

 
At Thursday, July 27, 2006, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Why can't Arabs, with all their oil money have more "influence" in American media, like wealthy british zionists have??

 
At Thursday, July 27, 2006, Blogger Unknown said...

Sadly, Prince Waleed bin Tallal has some share in Fox.

 
At Friday, July 28, 2006, Anonymous Anonymous said...

ISRAEL USING NAZI "BLITZKRIEG" WAR TACTICS

Israel's use of "BLITZKRIEG" war tactics--first, heavy aerial bombardment, then massive shelling using artillery pieces and tanks, and finally, a major push using overwhelming infantry forces--against the hapless civilans in both Gaza and Lebanon, was first used and refined by the NAZIS in WW II.

It's a bit ironic that Israel, who never misses a chance to blame the world and sow guilt for what happened during WW II, uses the same military tactics that the Nazi controlled Wehrmacht employed to success 65 years ago.
Israel is murdering in cold blood civilans just like the NAZIS did in WW II.

Way to go Israel! You've already turned the West Bank and Gaza into concentration camps with your so-called "security fence."
Now, instead of using gas chambers for your "FINAL SOLUTION" of dealing with the Palestinians, and now, the Lebanese people, Israel uses F-16's and 155 mm artillery shells, white phosphorous and chemical bombs.
Israel must have forgot the old saying, "Choose your enemies well."

Greg Bacon
Ava, MO

 

Post a Comment

<< Home