< HOME  Wednesday, June 28, 2006

Employers cut retiree healthcare, stick gov't w/ bill

Many Americans don't realize that when employers collect "subsidies" in order to provide health "benefits" to their employees, in effect, employees are paying for those so-called benefits themselves.
Most U.S. employers are planning to further scale back health benefits offered to retirees, as companies struggle with the upward march in the cost of medical care and weigh increased contributions from government's Medicare program, a survey found.

Ninety-five percent of the mostly Fortune 500 companies polled expect to further restrict their retiree health plans over the next five years, and 14 percent plan to stop providing coverage entirely, the survey of 163 companies by benefits consultants Watson Wyatt found.
Unbelievable. Between price gouging and tax breaks, money has been filling up their coffers like never before - yet they still can't get enough.
Employers have been exiting the retiree health business for a decade-and-a-half, amid rapid inflation in the cost of health care and increasing mobility of workers.
Don't you just love the euphemism? When workers get fired these days, more often than not they can no longer find full-time positions but must settle for temporary work, MINUS benefits. It is this disappearing job security that the MSM characterizes as "increased mobility."
[Some] feared the pace would quicken amid recent changes that boost benefits provided by Medicare, the government's health insurance program for the nation's 43 million elderly and disabled people.

"There is definitely more change in the air now that Medicare Part D has come into play . . . "The willingness to eliminate the benefit is clearly increasing."

Changes in the Medicare program include adding prescription drug benefits, known as Medicare Part D. Experts feared that with a richer government benefit, employers would be more likely to stop offering coverage.

About a third of U.S. employers offered current workers retiree coverage in 2005, down from about two-thirds in 1988, according to a recent study by the nonprofit Kaiser Family Foundation.

According to Standard & Poor's, plans for retiree benefits at S&P 500 companies, excluding pensions, were underfunded by $321 billion, meaning promises to retirees are only 22 percent funded.
They're not only cutting benefits, they don't even fund the ones they promise!
About three-quarters of U.S. companies polled are accepting a Medicare subsidy from the government intended to keep employers in the business of helping workers defray health costs when they retire.

But most are skimming the benefits they do offer. A quarter of employers are tightening eligibility for current workers, and a similar amount are offering more expensive plans.

About 40 percent of employers said they believed the best way to solve their retiree health cost problem is to exit it altogether, although most continued to offer benefits because of practical considerations, the study found.

The same amount, about 40 percent, said taking the government subsidy is the best way to keep costs down.
Of course it's the best way to keep costs down! They get the best of both worlds. Employees don't know the difference! Employers get the credit - government pays (i.e., taxpayers, a.k.a., employees)!
Jareb said it showed that even though companies might think exiting the business would help with costs, most are unlikely to do it at this point.

"In essence the numbers indicate that -- whether due to employee relations, benefits philosophy or collective bargaining -- exiting retiree heath is not a viable option for the majority of employers" the study said.
In other words, they would cut employee benefits in a heartbeat if it improved their bottomline.

Earth to working America - neither corporate America nor our government gives a flying sh*t about US. It's time to let them know that we're mad as hell and we're not going to take it anymore.


At Wednesday, June 28, 2006, Blogger Erosoplier said...

If you compare Australia's health care system to America's, you quickly come to the conclusion that the most efficient way to run big science health care (expensive machines for diagnostics and surgery, expensive medicines etc) is largely via the state. We have a strong public health care system in Australia - the poorest person in the land, more often than not, will get the best health care money can buy if they need it. This, and we spend significantly less on health car per capita than the US does.

We also have a strong private sector which was languishing, incidentally, until it started getting 30% of its funds directly from the taxpayer via a subsidy; and an increasing share of its business is from out-sourced public patients. Nice work if you can get it.

At Wednesday, June 28, 2006, Anonymous Anonymous said...

I've pretty much given up on Americans. Most of them are resoundingly stupid and brainwashed. If you take away their rights, liberties, and jobs, they actually believe that somehow that is a good thing. I remember a show on Frontline where they were tracking single mothers on welfare who were forced to get dead end, low pay jobs and lose their benefits, this one exceptionally stupid mother thought this was a good thing and welcomed it telling her interviewer, 'I can pull my self up by my own bootstraps' blah blah blah. By the end of the several month tracking period Frontline interviewed her again and she was a defeated wreck on the verge of homelessness. That's how America is going to go. All these brainwashed are going to welcome what's coming, and by the time they realized they paid for something they bought a pig in a poke, it will be too late for them to do anything about it.


Post a Comment

<< Home