< HOME  Wednesday, July 12, 2006

15yr-old girl beheaded, dog's head sewn on her body

I can't make this sh*t up. But, maybe someone else can.
[T]his report from CNN's Nic Robertson comes as a shock:
One international official told me of reports among his staff that a 15-year-old girl had been beheaded and a dog's head sewn on her body in its place; and of a young child who had had his hands drilled and bolted together before being killed.
From its gruesome particulars, the report goes on to describe the fear that has gripped even the most hardened Iraqis during this latest round of sectarian bloodletting. Robertson's dispatch points to a revolting truth about the war in Iraq--one that American officers discovered long ago, but which has yet to penetrate fully the imaginations of theoreticians writing from a distant remove.
Now, watch very carefully as Kaplan spins this into his agenda.
The fact is, there is very little that we can do to dampen the sectarian rage and pathologies tearing Iraq apart at the seams. Did the Army make a mistake when it banished "counterinsurgency" from the lexicon of military affairs? Absolutely. Does it matter in Iraq? Probably not.

How can you win over the heart and mind of someone who sews a dog's head on a girl? Would more U.S. troops alter Iraq's homicidal dynamic? Not really, given that, on the question of sectarian rage, America is now largely beside the point.
Kaplan has, at the outset, accepted without question this bizarre and monstrous description of a dog sewn on a girl's head (despite the incredibility of its source) and concluded that Iraqis are barbarians at heart - totally and utterly beyond redemption.

Of course, this conveniently absolves the Bush administration for its disastrous criminal invasion of a sovereign nation under false pretenses. I think not.
True, U.S. troops can be--and have been--a vital buffer between Iraq's warring sects. But they cannot reprogram their coarsened and brittle cultures.

Even if America had arrived in Iraq with a detailed post-war plan, twice the number of troops, and all the counterinsurgency expertise in the world, my guess is that we would have found ourselves in exactly the same spot. The Iraqis, after all, still would have had the final say.
Now, THERE is some hardcore psyops propaganda!

Alex Jones is right. There's a WAR being waged for our minds. Stay vigilant.

___________________
Thanks for the tip, Anon

8 Comments:

At Wednesday, July 12, 2006, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Not only our minds - our souls! The Devil feeds on lost souls :O

 
At Wednesday, July 12, 2006, Blogger jc said...

they're just trying to draw attention away from the rape of abir.

 
At Wednesday, July 12, 2006, Blogger qrswave said...

yes, he does, anon.

and yes, I agree jc. It's a load of crap.

 
At Wednesday, July 12, 2006, Blogger brookskof said...

So what is the official lie these days? I thought the lost still believed we were fighting an unlimited reservoir of organized terrorists. According to this Nic Robertson it appears that we are fighting Iraqis. If we are fighting Iraqis then did we not invade their country to occupy it and now hold it against their will? And if we are fighting Iraqis and not terrorists then why does Iraq keep being mentioned in the "war on terror" and why all these ridiculous misleading articles about "we have created terrorism in Iraq" etc. There is no huge terrorist army. That is asinine. We are fighting Iraqis because we invaded their country. Iraqis != terrorists. (!= means not equal for the non coders). But soon I suppose there won't be anyone left who sees a difference in an Iraqi and a terrorist after all this brainwashing.

 
At Wednesday, July 12, 2006, Blogger Citisucks said...

If you want to get to the root of terrorism and fight the terrorists then send troops to the White House, Citigroup Headquarters and Walmart Headquarters to take out the rich white male corporate terrorists.

What is being fought is a war against non-white people (and dissenters, and poor people). That is why the nationality does not matter. To idiot America one non-white person=another non-white person.

 
At Wednesday, July 12, 2006, Blogger Undeniable Liberal said...

Her face
http://cannonfire.blogspot.com/2006/07/her-face.html
not graphic

 
At Thursday, July 13, 2006, Blogger brookskof said...

you're right the nationality doesn't matter. But the race does not matter either. I'm tired of being targeted as some kind of evil entity because I'm a white male. The rich corrupt aren't choose the targets that they are because they aren't white-males. It's because they're in a convenient situation for exploitation. The whole racial tension and divide is completely perpetuated against us. The more it is pushed the more divide and problems there are. This includes saying "those damn white-males".

 
At Sunday, July 23, 2006, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Fascinating reading - so many idiots at one Web site. Got here by accident, fleeing by design.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home