posted by qrswave @ Sunday, August 13, 2006
I find it sickening to the bone how that word is twisted around so much. As written on the top right, it's indeed "Devils' logic" That cartoon indeed says a thousand words.Thanks a lot for sharing
Because the corporate terrorists can brainwash stupid white people to smile while being murdered by them does not mean, that they can do the same to the rest of us. Non-white people are smarter and the corporate terrorists better realize that we fight back.
Warning: Bush is on vacation again. Will you and your family suvive?Whenever Chimpy is on vacation, all the terra alerts should be pegged at red. Especially when he vacations in August...
dfte,oh sh*t - you're right!
HELLO ALL: Here are 2 small paragraphs i could get from the philosoher Nietzsche's book "Beyond Good And Evil" which talks about how hungry for power, how nervous and how un-conformists, and how immodarate with alot of unchecked hunger, nervous and dangerous are Jews to the stability of Europe and the world. It also talks about Rusia as a possible world power: They are on the book Beyond Good And Evil part 250-252Here is a link of the e-book:http://www.geocities.com/thenietzschechannel/bge.htm250What Europe owes to the Jews?— Many things, good and bad, and above all one thing that is at once of the best and the worst: the grand style in morality, the dreadfulness and majesty of infinite demands, infinite significances, the whole romanticism and sublimity of moral questionabilities—and consequently precisely the most attractive, insidious and choicest part of those iridescences and seductions to life with whose afterglow the sky of our European culture, its evening sky, is now aflame—and perhaps burning itself up. We artists among the spectators and philosophers are—grateful to the Jews for this.251If a people is suffering and wants to suffer from nationalistic nervous fever and political ambition, it must be expected that all sorts of clouds and disturbances—in short, little attacks of stupidity—will pass over its spirit into the bargain: among present-day Germans, for example, now the anti-French stupidity, now the anti-Jewish, now the anti-Polish, now the Christian-romantic, now the Wagnerian, now the Teutonic, now the Prussian (just look at those miserable historians, those Sybels and Treitschkes [Heinrich von Sybel (1817-95) and Heinrich von Treitschke (1834-96)], with their thickly bandaged heads—), and whatever else these little obfuscations of the German spirit and conscience may be called. May it be forgiven me that I too, during a daring brief sojourn in a highly infected area, did not remain wholly free of the disease and began, like the rest of the world, to entertain ideas about things that were none of my business: first symptom of the political infection. About the Jews, for example: listen.— I have never met a German who was favorably inclined towards the Jews; and however unconditionally all cautious and politic men may have repudiated real anti-Jewism, even this caution and policy is not directed against this class of feeling itself but only against its dangerous immoderation, and especially against the distasteful and shameful way in which this immoderate feeling is expressed—one must not deceive oneself about that. That Germany has an ample sufficiency of Jews, that the German stomach, German blood has difficulty (and will continue to have difficulty for a long time to come) in absorbing even this quantum of “Jew”—as the Italians, the French, the English have absorbed them through possessing a stronger digestion—: this is the clear declaration and language of a universal instinct to which one must pay heed, in accordance with which one must act. “Let in no more Jews! And close especially the doors to the East (also to Austria)!”—thus commands the instinct of a people whose type is still weak and undetermined, so that it could easily be effaced, easily extinguished by a stronger race. The Jews, however, are beyond all doubt the strongest, toughest and purest race at present living in Europe; they know how to prevail even under the worst conditions (better even than under favorable ones), by means of virtues which one would like to stamp as vices—thanks above all to a resolute faith which does not need to be ashamed before “modem ideas”; they change, when they change, only in the way in which the Russian Empire makes its conquests—an empire that has time and is not of yesterday—: namely, according to the principle “as slowly as possible”! A thinker who has the future of Europe on his conscience will, in all the designs he makes for this future, take the Jews into account as he will take the Russians, as the immediately surest and most probable factors in the great game and struggle of forces. That which is called a “nation” in Europe today and is actually more of a res facta than nata (indeed sometimes positively resembles a res ficta et picta [res facta: something made; res nata: something born; res ficta et picta: something fictitious and unreal]—) is in any case something growing, young, easily disruptable, not yet a race, let alone such an aere perennius [more enduring than bronze] as the Jewish type is: these “nations” should certainly avoid all hot-headed rivalry and hostility very carefully! That the Jews could, if they wanted—or if they were compelled, as the anti-Semites seem to want—even now predominate, indeed quite literally rule over Europe, is certain; that they are not planning and working towards that is equally certain. In the meantime they are, rather, wanting and wishing, even with some importunity, to be absorbed and assimilated by and into Europe, they are longing to be finally settled, permitted, respected somewhere and to put an end to the nomadic life, to the “Wandering Jew”—; one ought to pay heed to this inclination and impulse (which is perhaps even a sign that the Jewish instincts are becoming milder) and go out to meet it: for which it would perhaps be a good idea to eject the anti-Semitic ranters from the country. Go out to meet it with all caution, with selectivity; much as the English nobility do. It is plain that the stronger and already more firmly formed types of the new Germanism could enter into relations with them with the least hesitation; the aristocratic officer of the March, for example: it would be interesting in many ways to see whether the genius of money and patience (and above all a little mind and spirituality, of which there is a plentiful lack in the persons above mentioned—) could not be added and bred into the hereditary art of commanding and obeying, in both of which the above-mentioned land is today classic. But here it is fitting that I should break off my cheerful Germanomaniac address: for already I am touching on what is to me serious, on the “European problem” as I understand it, on the breeding of a new ruling caste for Europe. —252They are no philosophical race—these English: Bacon signifies an attack on the philosophical spirit in general, Hobbes, Hume and Locke a debasement and devaluation of the concept “philosopher” for more than a century. It was against Hume that Kant rose up; it was Locke of whom Schelling had a right to say: “je méprise Locke” [“I despise Locke”];
*Ping* Blog members!Sy Hersh has a new New Yorker piece.A snippet:In the days after Hezbollah crossed from Lebanon into Israel, on July 12th, to kidnap two soldiers, triggering an Israeli air attack on Lebanon and a full-scale war, the Bush Administration seemed strangely passive. “It’s a moment of clarification,” President George W. Bush said at the G-8 summit, in St. Petersburg, on July 16th. “It’s now become clear why we don’t have peace in the Middle East.” He described the relationship between Hezbollah and its supporters in Iran and Syria as one of the “root causes of instability,” and subsequently said that it was up to those countries to end the crisis. Two days later, despite calls from several governments for the United States to take the lead in negotiations to end the fighting, Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice said that a ceasefire should be put off until “the conditions are conducive.”The Bush Administration, however, was closely involved in the planning of Israel’s retaliatory attacks. President Bush and Vice-President Dick Cheney were convinced, current and former intelligence and diplomatic officials told me, that a successful Israeli Air Force bombing campaign against Hezbollah’s heavily fortified underground-missile and command-and-control complexes in Lebanon could ease Israel’s security concerns and also serve as a prelude to a potential American preëmptive attack to destroy Iran’s nuclear installations, some of which are also buried deep underground.In his usual style, Hersh lays it all out. And as usual, it ain't pretty.Oh yeah, the link.
Nothing but the truth...blog.willensoares.com
What's the difference between a Nazi and a Zionist? Ed. The Nazis wanted to round up all the Jews and have them killed, the Zionist want to round up all the Jews and have them kill.
Before learning WHAT we read, it may be helpful if we actually learn HOW to read, a case in point being that little "snippet" attributed to the immortal Seymour Hersh, above. An ideal way to learn to read this would be an instant crash course in Evelyn Woods' Reading Dynamics, or Speed Reeder 101. All you really ever have to read is the first sentence, and you're done! As a matter of FACT,( which all geriatric New Yorker hacks and their unassailable sources like to purvey as their own precious commodity ) it's completely unnecessary to even read that whole sentence. All you need to KNOW is- ( and this is BIBLE TRUTH ! ) that- "In the days after *HIZ-BULL-AH!* crossed from LEBANON INTO ISRAEL, ( on JULY 12th ), to KIDNAP KIDNAP KIDNAP two (2) soldiers, triggering full scale war etc. FINIS."- to LEARN that Mr. See More, SIGH HERSH, a universally lauded I Saw it First at My Lie Disinformation Agent, is actually only MILQUETOAST, without the MILQUE, thanx but no thanx. And we ALL know what that is, don't we?
Code red-more like code , elmo
Post a Comment