< HOME  Friday, October 02, 2009

In Roman Polanski case, is it Hollywood vs. Middle America? -- latimes.com

In Roman Polanski case, is it Hollywood vs. Middle America? -- latimes.com

Posted using ShareThis

(Excerpted under Fair Use U.S. Code Title 17, CH. I, § 107; © 2009 Los Angeles Times)

Biggest laff in the article:

In an interview, [Harvey] Weinstein said that people generally misunderstand what happened to Polanski at sentencing. He's not convinced public opinion is running against the filmmaker and dismisses the categorization of Hollywood as amoral. "Hollywood has the best moral compass, because it has compassion," Weinstein said. "We were the people who did the fundraising telethon for the victims of 9/11. We were there for the victims of Katrina and any world catastrophe."

I cannot help but laugh that a prominent Jewish producer and studio executive, notorious for his bloated ego, profane outbursts and temper tantrums not unlike another insanely vain homosexual Jew producer Scott Rudin, deflect the common middle-America accusation Hollywood is 'amoral.'

Well, in my opinion, Hollywood is amoral, and it has always been that way since the late 60's.

Case example. 2009 looks to be one of the most "vulgar" movie release years in terms of self-indulgent vulgarity for the sake of low-brow comedy, free-range, non-stop swearing and shock. The Ugly Truth, Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen, The Hangover, Funny People, Observe and Report, ad nauseam. Can you watch these films in a row and still enjoy in spite of filthily asinine and mindless content?

Wonder why I haven't been to the movies or rent video lately since I saw that lame "Planet with 6 Billion Vulcans blown up" movie Star Trek? Too much vulgarity and crap quality, not to mention subtle or not-so-subtle propaganda rammed by Jewish producers who must remind the stupid goyim audience "Holocaust matters, and don't you forget it."

No "celebrity," no matter how rich, famous and philanthropic, is above the law. The who's who list of Cinema VIP club who sign the petition urging that the "persecuted" director be freed without facing American justice show their true color as pretentious and amoral 'artists' who think backwards and on a crooked path when it comes to prevalent moral values and national culture in conformation to inscribed law regulating socially contemptible crime and conduct. L.A. Times article aptly notes, "Is Hollywood's position that we're-better-than-you elitist while the rest of the country's is everybody-obeys-the-law populist?" They should be ashamed.

Since Inglorious Basterds and other dumb Holohoax movies (Defiance, etc) are the shining example of Hollywood vindictiveness heaped upon the unsuspecting world by pro-Israel propagandists, it's about time a slimy, predatory member of the "chosen race" Roman Polanski face American justice with a chance of being sentenced to prison term, unless American justice system is corrupt beyond redemption, like it continues to overlook high treason of the parasitic Neocon/Neolib Zionist stranglehold on Washington body politics.

The fact that a rape victim called for Roman to be freed is irrelevant, because 1) it does not and should not affect the outcome of American justice in prosecution and sentencing regardless of wealth and prestige, and 2) she "sold out" to Roman in exchange for "Jew gold," that is, monetary settlement, irrespective of the law in American and California jurisdiction.

The saying goes, "You do the crime, you do the time." Roman is a pathologically narcissistic deviant who favors younger European White women (shiksa) and a cowardly fugitive. He deserves to have the book thrown at his face.

Whiny Hollywood Elite can scream, cry and hold breath till their face turn blue. Preferably self-asphyxiated to death. The less the moronic filth peddled by Zionist loyalists and traitorously divisive culture polluters, the better for America and the world except L.A., NYC, France (thanks, Nicholas & moronic diplomats) and Israel.


Update: Letter to the editor at The Philadelphia Inquirer: Hollywood hypocrisy evident in Polanski case

Washed-up actress Whoopi Goldberg claims it isn't "rape-rape". Orly? Here's a sordid grand jury testimony and see how you continue to apologize for the 'oh-so-important artist-friend who suffered so much' and deflect it as not rape-rape, idiot.


At Friday, October 02, 2009, Blogger Nepos Libertas said...

lol, check out the pro-Polanski petition signed by entertainment industry people. Spot the petitioners with distinctly Jewish surnames. Yes, even Natalie Portman felt Roman should be freed. I wonder what the hell was she thinking -- no compassion and empathy for female rape victims, especially imagining her in Samantha's feet to experience the creepy terror of being drugged to be raped and sodomized by an amorally bullying Jew filmmaker? Or maybe it's because only Jews look out for each other and jump defend fellow Jews when found guilty of crimes approved by the Talmud to exploit the Goy for perversion and horror. Like Harvey Weinstein who dismissively called it "so-called" crime and Whoopi Goldberg pooh-poohing it as not rape. Hollywood is a moral sewer, and the collective apologetic and defensive behavior of the people who signed the petition prove they revel in immoral values and lifestyle -- one rule for the VIP club of elites, another rule for the commoners who pay to read, watch and listen to their "what we really think of uptight moralists with extended middle finger" filth.

At Sunday, October 04, 2009, Blogger andie531 said...

I call "The View" "The Bimbos from Hell" show.


Post a Comment

<< Home