AIPAC looms larger than ever
First Bolton, now Dick. Is this who we pay these people to represent?
Vice President Dick Cheney said in a speech Tuesday to a pro-Israel lobbying group that Iran will not be allowed to have a nuclear weapon and warned that the issue may soon go before the Security Council.Is this for real? Can it get anymore transparent?
"The Iranian regime needs to know that if it stays on its present course, the international community is prepared to impose meaningful consequences," Cheney said in a speech to the American Israel Public Affairs Committee.
"We join other nations in sending that regime a clear message: we will not allow Iran to have a nuclear weapon," Cheney said.
He said the U.S. "is keeping all options on the table in addressing the irresponsible conduct of the regime." In the past the U.S. has said it has no intention of using military force for now, but has declined to completely rule it out.
posted by qrswave @ Tuesday, March 07, 2006
13 Comments:
"We join other nations in sending that regime a clear message: we will not allow Iran to have a nuclear weapon," Cheney said.
And what other Nations are there, that are sending this so called message, other than the obvious of course.
Anon,
I think the more pertinent question is not which nations are sending this message, but which country benefits more directly than any other such that immediate steps are proposed to prevent something that is only remotely possible?
I think Byrne mentioned in another page that the Washington Post reported that Iran was 10 years away from acquiring nuclear weapons technology.
Of course, there is also the immediate concern of the oil bourse and the imminent collapse of the international monetary system thanks to massive counterfeiting, unsustainable debt, and the out of control derivatives market, among other scams.
But, this still leaves me with the gnawing question, why is Israel pressing so hard for immediate action against Iran? Is it a marriage of convenience, or does it go deeper than that? Why are top US officials personally keeping AIPAC up to date and assured?
Check out pictures of this anti-AIPAC demonstration in DC, Monday.
Trigger happy Dick also forgot to mention that Iran is a non-proliferation act signatory, while Israel is not.
Third pillar of the NPT says:
"the treaty gives every state the inalienable right to use nuclear energy for peaceful purposes, and as the commercially popular light water reactor nuclear power station designs use enriched uranium fuel, it follows that states must be allowed to enrich uranium or purchase it on an international market".
Just putting it out there...
But, this still leaves me with the gnawing question, why is Israel pressing so hard for immediate action against Iran? Is it a marriage of convenience, or does it go deeper than that? Why are top US officials personally keeping AIPAC up to date and assured?
Because if we wait longer, wait until Iran has nukes, then we risk a Nuclear Holocaust of the world. At the very least, if we destroy nuke facilities that have nuke materials in them, the civilian casualty count is much higher - as this would set off a nuclear bomb in the region - than if preemptive, targeted strikes occur.
All out war would be horrible. If it's between all out war and not acting (and targeted strikes are impossible), then I choose nothing. All out war is the worst of all possibilities.
Oh well. We shall see what happens.
romunov,
Then again, Israel is a friend and ally and Iran is not.
Apply this friend/foe article to your neighbourhood - does it work? Or do humans have rights and due process of law.
What you and your cohorts are proclaiming is the abandonment of all semblance of international law - and a "might is right" philosophy.
This leads me to say: Never has the accumulation of military arsenal not led to war - because sooner or later "might is right" idiots will say, "why not"?
Fair enough! Taken with a grin. Wait for the barbarians!
no it can't. OMG "this is the big one Weezy!"
Miss r,
Because if we wait longer, wait until Iran has nukes....
Yes, but the Bush mouthpiece The Washington Post reported[*] that the most recent National Intelligence Estimate (NIE) of Iran’s nuclear program revealed that, “Iran is about a decade away from manufacturing the key ingredient for a nuclear weapon, roughly doubling the previous estimate of five years.”
[*]Dafina Linzer, “Iran Is Judged 10 Years From Nuclear Bomb U.S. Intelligence Review Contrasts With Administration Statements,” Washington Post, August 2, 2005; Page A01
SO PLEASE EXPLAIN THE RUSH, Miss r
Akber,
I am not advocating even targeted military strikes if Iran takes its rhetoric down a notch. Let them say the Holocaust DID happen. Let them say Israel has a right to exist. Let the Iranian president prove he is trustworthy and will not give nuclear secrets to those who seek to destruction of Israel and the US.
Then fine - no war.
I am all for peace if it is possible.
The ball is in the President of Iran's court.
And Byrne, I already answered your contention. If we wait too long, and Iran proves it is willing and able to use the nukes - then it is too late. if we wait until they are near done in making a nuke in order for a targeted military strike (which is all I advocate), then the strike itself will cause a nuclear reaction. Which is...bad.
Miss R,
Why would he say that - he's an enemy, not a friend of Israel and US. Ha ha :)
Remember, enemies and friends means no justice!
those in power being of course, zionists.
curious fact. according to jack bernstein:
"The ASHKENAZI Jews, who now comprise 90% of the Jews in the world, had a rather strange beginning. According to historians, many of them Jewish, the Ashkenazi Jews came into existence about 1200 years ago. It happened this way:
At the eastern edge of Europe, there lived a tribe of people known as the Khazars. About the year 740 A.D., the Khazar king and his court decided they should adopt a religion for their people. So, representatives of the three major religions, Christianity, Islam and Judaism, were invited to present their religious doctrines. The Khazars chose Judaism, but it wasn't for religious reasons. If the Khazars had chosen Islam, they would have angered the strong Christian world. If they had chosen Christianity, they would have angered the strong Islamic world. So, they played it safe -- they chose Judaism. It wasn't for religious reasons the Khazars chose Judaism; it was for political reasons.
Sometime during the 13th century, the Khazars were driven from their land and they migrated westward with most of them settling in Poland and Russia. These Khazars are now known as Ashkenazi Jews. Because these Khazar (Ashkenazi) Jews merely chose Judaism, they are not really Jews -- AT LEAST NOT BLOOD JEWS."
So, Askhenazis are not Jews by Blood. They have no relation to the land. And their religious profession is a sham. Are they still Jews? Or are they "Jews."
Bernstein continues:
"Nearly all Arab Moslems and Arab Christians do have respect, even reverence, toward the holiness of the land; but, only a small minority of the Jews have the same respect. 95% of the Jewish population are atheists or secular humanists and are not impeded by the Ten Commandments or other restraints on sinful human behavior.
When the Zionist/Bolshevik Jews won control of the "Holy Land," every form of sin began seeping into this land. Within a few short decades, the holy land became a modern-day Sodom and Gomorrah. Drug trade, drug abuse, illegal weapons sales, prostitution, gambling, labor racketeering, murder, extortion, blackmail, insurance fraud, loan-sharking and corruption of government officials and police became part of daily life in Israel…"
"If Israel AS IT NOW EXISTS simply collapsed and ceased to exist, the world would certainly be better because of it. Unfortunately the New York/Moscow/Tel Aviv triangle will not allow Israel to die quietly. As the collapse of Israel draws nearer one of two courses of action by the triangle is likely to be taken:
1. Israel could trigger a large-scale Mideast war, a war which Israel could not win alone. Then the New York leg of the triangle would use its influence on the U.S. government to send U.S. military forces to aid Israel.
It isn't expected that the Moscow leg of the triangle will become militarily involved. Moscow will merely sit back and let the U.S. weaken itself in helping Israel fight the Arabs.
At some point during the war, when the U.S. military is deeply involved and the U.S. citizens demoralized, the Zionist-oriented Jewish international bankers will make their move. Evidence leads to the conclusion that it is these bankers who own the Class A Stock of the U.S. Federal Reserve, America's central bank. In this position of power these Zionist bankers can, and likely will, trigger an economic collapse in America -- like they did in 1929 when they caused the stock market crash and started the severe depression of the 1930's.
Since the money system currently used in the U.S. is NOT backed by gold, silver, or anything of value, the paper dollars and tin coins now in use will be worthless.
In the resulting state of confusion and in an effort to obtain food and other necessities, the American people will accept the "New States Constitution" which has already been written. This will place the American people under the dictates of one-world government run by the Zionist-oriented international bankers and Zionist/bolshevik Jews.
Exactly what direction the war in the Mideast will take only the New York/Moscow/Tel Aviv triangle and God can know.
When it is all over, the main LOSERS will be:
The American people.
The Arab people.
The Sephardic Jews and those Ashkenazi Jews who stand for justice and freedom.
The only WINNERS will be:
The Zionist international bankers and the Zionist/bolshevik (communist/socialist) Jews.
2. The other likely course of action would be a back-up plan, IF the American taxpayers say, "We've had enough!"
The cost of supporting a bankrupt Israel is draining increasing amounts of money from the American taxpayers. At some point,the taxpayers are going to say "enough!" When that happens, the Moscow leg of the New York/Moscow/Tel Aviv triangle will move in to fill the void.
To neutralize the United States, the Zionist international bankers will likely create an economic collapse and throw the U.S. into a state of chaos.
What military action the Soviet bolshevik Jews and the Israeli Zionist/bolshevik Jews will take against the Arab countries only the TRIANGLE and God can know. It is likely they will strike at the Arab oil fields first.
But whatever action is taken, one thing is certain -- the LOSERS will be:
The American people.
The Arab people.
The Sephardic Jews and those Ashkenazi Jews who are for justice and freedom.
The only WINNERS will be:
The Zionist international bankers and the Zionist/bolshevik (communist/socialist) Jews.
And just before he ends the book he gave us this decription of you, sayan, in 1985, and it fits you to a t:
"The contents of this book are expected to bring a strong reaction from the Zionist Jews.
I am well aware of the tactics YOU, my Zionist brethren, use to quiet anyone who attempts to expose any of your subversive acts.
If the person is a gentile, you cry, "you're anti-Semitic," which is nothing more than a smokescreen to hide your actions.
But if a Jew is the person doing the exposing, you resort to other tactics:
* First, you ignore the charges, hoping the information will not be given widespread distribution.
* If the information starts reaching too many people, you ridicule the information and the person or persons giving the information.
* If that doesn't work, your next step is character assassination. If the author or speaker hasn't been involved in sufficient scandal, you are adept at fabricating a scandal against the person or persons.
* If none of these are effective, you are known to resort to physical attacks.
But NEVER do you try to prove the information wrong."
He, being a "jew", must have known your kind very well, sayan.
as here: "You are adorable, JC. Cute li'l malcontent! Aww...so adorable! Stick still firmly lodged high up your ass, huh?"
says volumes about you, sayan. about your vileness, depravity, decadence, disease, immorality and amorality. there is nothing good or light in you, sayan. all your mock expressions of empathy ring hollow, even in writing. you are empty , sayan, shallow and rotten to the core.
but yes, you do profess no faith as 95% of you ilk. you, as they, hope there will be no judgment. if anything you fear judgement, don't you, sayan. imagine being told to rise from your grave and have your crimes read out to you, sayan.
hell is forever, sayan, and the fire was lit a long time ago, it burns so hot it has no color and there is no light.
and even though you, as many like you contemplate suicide, that is no escape, sayan, you will not slip quietly into the darkness.
you will be held responsible.
sleep well sayan. soon you will awaken.
Post a Comment
<< Home