< HOME  Wednesday, September 27, 2006

9/11 - closing in on the BIG LIE



Check out the steel core columns sliced in clean, 45 degree angles!

There is NO WAY this happened spontaneously as a result of structural collapse.

The Truth is closing in on the BIG LIE, surrounding it from every angle, as more and more people learn the Truth and talk about it openly.

At this rate, by this time next year, the people who perpetrated these crimes will be hanging from the gallows - where they belong!



___________________________________
Order the whole 9/11 Mysteries series, if you can afford it, to thank them for their awesome work and to support the search for Truth.

5 Comments:

At Wednesday, September 27, 2006, Blogger Nortimus said...

It's hard to keep the facts straight, and the truths against the myths. Unfortunately I have fears: Even with the professors, journalists, celebrities and so on coming out to say hey, there's something wrong about 9/11, we live in such an apathetic country that I wonder if anything would be done anyway. These lies are far too big and elaborate to stay hidden forever, and yet I still worry for the future of my country...


Keep up the fantastic reporting. You guys are an inspiration.

 
At Wednesday, September 27, 2006, Blogger Akber said...

Nice video - however none of the demolition scenarios address the issue that the bottom of the towers - below the falling top - do not appear to buckle or bend, as they would if the basement gave way. And as they do in other controlled demolitions. The bottom floors are intact until the falling top hits it.

Also, the time lag between the sounds picked up on the audio - and the fall is not explained. If the basement was blown out, it would be seconds before the tower fell.

Again, I don't want to be the party spoiler here but we want to get at the truth, don't we?

 
At Wednesday, September 27, 2006, Blogger Saif Katana said...

It is evident that the collapse of WTC1 and WTC2 do not look like any >standard< demolition. This does not rule out a >non standard< demolition. WTC1 and WTC2 where the stars of the 9/11 show and if they would be demolished the standard way it would be immediately obvious that 9/11 was fake.
The real terrorists where probably so arrogant they thought they could make WTC7 just disappear without the public noticing it, so they just used the simpler >standard< demo.

Demolition is the best (possibly the only) explaination for the 45 degree angle cuts.
The beams don't even seem to have buckled (at 8min40sec).

 
At Thursday, September 28, 2006, Blogger AlreadyPublished said...

....none of the demolition scenarios address the issue that the bottom of the towers - below the falling top - do not appear to buckle or bend, as they would if the basement gave way.

Nonsense, akber.

noto bene...

WTC Phenomena:
* five explosives-tainted Israeli men detained as "suspected conspirators"
* collapse initiation
* resistance-free rate of collapse
* pre-collapse radiant molten cascade and correlated "pressure pulses"
* pre-collapse extremely high-velocity ejection of debris with correlated "pressure pulse"
* pre-collapse metal fire
* multiple concordant explosion reports
* post-collapse abundance of molten metal

Jetliner-Fire Theory implausibly explains:
* collapse initiation

Incendiary Demolition Theory sufficiently explains:
* five explosives-tainted Israeli men detained as "suspected conspirators"
* collapse initiation
* resistance-free rate of collapse
* pre-collapse radiant molten cascade and correlated "pressure pulses"
* pre-collapse extremely high-velocity ejection of debris with correlated "pressure pulse"
* pre-collapse metal fire
multiple concordant explosion reports
* post-collapse abundance of molten metal

 
At Thursday, September 28, 2006, Blogger shirtees.net said...

Does anyone have a face to match this cute sounding girl narrating these videos?

 

Post a Comment

<< Home