Can You Say DE-FLATION?
I can! and so can the housing market!
Let me remind you WHY housing prices are so darn high to begin with!
REALITY can only be masked for so long before it sears through the ILLUSION.
I can! and so can the housing market!
I would choose a DRAFT.
STEP 1: CONTROL the money supply;
How much money is your time worth?
"The financial markets are humming and life is good."
STEP 1: wrest control of the money supply from the selfish greedy lunatics that are currently at the helm
STEP 2: establish a decentralized, interest-free, nonprofit banking system.
STEP 3: channel ALL our wealth into rebuilding our lives and communities, WITHOUT diverting massive amounts through interest to those not entitled to it.
Richard Sauder's reaction to the announcement of GM's layoffs is almost identical to my own. I have emphasized in bold italics the portions that are particularly important.
"The news of the 30,000 jobs that General Motors recently announced it plans to cut caught my attention like a searing brand plunged deep into my mind."
"[T}he United States ... is rapidly deindustrializing, in large degree as a consequence of ... so-called Free Trade agreements ... such as NAFTA, CAFTA and the WTO which have made capital and entire industries very portable internationally, to the considerable detriment of workers at home and abroad."
"[S]ociopaths are running most of the major governments of the world, and most of the major industries and financial institutions, and sociopaths are not much interested in mutual uplift and global benefit for the great bulk of the human race . . . [they] are primarily interested in war, plunder, destruction, cruel domination, violent subjugation, and ruthless social control."
"Essentially, the entire nation is in hock. We've been pawned."
"We are already exporting astronomical quantities of American currency, and millions of jobs to go with the big bucks. The printing presses are running madly 24/7 the year around. The American government, allied with the high finance sector of the economy, has conspired to sell us out to the highest bidders"
"[T]he United States is positively awash in a tsunami of imported merchandise...the captains of American industry destroy the country from within, ransacking the economy, plundering entire industries and communities as they loot the productive base of the country for their own personal enrichment, without the slightest thought for the well-being of anyone else at all. . . the psychopaths and sociopaths in the ... government and in high finance ... liquidate the country from under our feet..."
"Their behavior is like that of madmen ... who heat the house in the cruel depths of a bone-chilling ... winter by stripping the insulation out of the walls and using it to stoke the furnace! As the flames leap higher they strip the shingles and plywood off the roof and fling them into the furnace!! ... they fling back the blankets ... rip the paneling off of the walls, tear up the floor boards and take an axe to the furniture and feed it all to the devouring flames in the furnace."
They belittled [Ross Perot's] warning that the "sucking sound" they were about to hear would be the sound of ... capital and jobs [being] leached out of the American economy...but [they] didn't like him ... so they tossed him aside. So much to plunder; so much to loot -- and so little time!!
"The American economy, like Elvis, has left the building...the bleeding of jobs, money and industries just goes on and on. We are living in a country in steep and rapid decline.I rest my case. We can't both be wrong in our assessment of what's happening. But, I would argue that underneath the surface of those trade agreements fractional reserve financing at INTEREST is primarily to blame for the multi-national economic devastation that we are witnessing today, along with a number of corrupt greedy dictators willing to sell their people for a paltry price.
I am taking a brief hiatus to prepare for final exams. In all likelihood, I will not be posting new entries until the end of December (unless I positively can't resist).
In a democratic republic that proclaims that all men are created equal the monetary system must accord with this proclamation.
MONEY is a uniform standard of exchange that has value only insofar as it is accepted by enough people such that it can effectively serve its purpose--to facilitate exchange of people's labor and the fruits of people's labor.
No Thanks to Thanksgiving is an excellent article by Robert Jensen!
" A Revolution is coming- a revolution which will be peaceful if we are wise enough: compassionate if we care enough ; successful if we are fortunate enough- but a revolution is coming whether we will it or not. We can affect it's character, we cannot alter it's inevitability."--JFK 1963
then you're talking to the wrong people.
This is true, to a degree.
"Equality of talents, of education, or of wealth can not be produced by human institutions. In the full enjoyment of the gifts of Heaven and the fruits of superior industry, economy, and virtue, every man is equally entitled to protection by law;..."
"...but when the laws undertake to add to these natural and just advantages artificial distinctions, to grant titles, gratuities, and exclusive privileges, to make the rich richer and the potent more powerful, the humble members of society the farmers, mechanics, and laborers who have neither the time nor the means of securing like favors to themselves, have a right to complain of the injustice of their Government..."
"There are no necessary evils in government. Its evils exist only in its abuses. If it would confine itself to equal protection, and, as Heaven does its rains, shower its favors alike on the high and the low, the rich and the poor, it would be an unqualified blessing. In the act before me there seems to be a wide and unnecessary departure from these just principles.
It looks like its official. My comments have been BLOCKED from the Mises Economics Blog!
As glorious as a return to hard currency would be for libertarians, the costs of producing and handling that money would detract from its value to the economy as a whole as the energies and resources expended in maintaining the curreny might be better used elsewhere in the economy. That is one of the reasons it was abandoned, in the first place.
In contrast, in an interest-free economy, the barriers created by hard currency against the abuses of printing too much of it would not be as sorely needed as it is in today's interest-ridden economy. A uniform paper money could be printed as needed in each state at the local level, where abuses can be more easily contained, and money production in all the states can be coordinated and adjusted at the federal level to ensure balanced economic growth. Because money is interest-free, accounting and economic analysis is much simpler than if it was encumbered with interest.
Now, I'm not an economist. But, it seems to me that the wild fluctuations in the value of our money throughout our nation's history is not just the result of printing too much of it, but also the consequence of the unbridled use of interest at every turn.
You can't fight human nature. If you try, you're a fool.
You DO NOT give one entity control of the money supply;Selfish people do not control their own greed. It is either contained, OR it will consume all else.
allow it to corrupt that supply with an accounting fraud called interest; and
then expect it to control itself!
Everything is relative.
Who gives a hoot?!!
Below is an email correspondence between me and Bill Scheurer, who's running for Congress and who pledges to fight against debt.
To illustrate my point about interest with figures that are closer to home, this link shows state and city break downs of how your federal tax dollars are spent.
America's heartland is being abandoned.
These people are ruthless!
GM plans to announce sweeping job cuts and plant closures.
"GM's previously announced plan, to slash up to 25,000 jobs over three years, is likely to accelerate in talks with the United Auto Workers, analysts say, so GM can shutter plants before GM's national union contract expires in 2007."
"There is absolutely no plan, strategy or intention for GM to file for bankruptcy," Rick Wagoner, Chairman of GM.
"I did not have sexual relations with that woman." Bill Clinton, President of the United States.
Ford intends to cut 4000 white-collar jobs in 2006.
GM's at the brink;
Disney's consumer profits are sluggish;
the Tribune and others are looking to cut costs;
veterans can't find work;
Wallace & Gromit are just not performing stateside.
Heck, even the government has to cut costs!
...keep the change. :)
"Why don't you just come right out and say to which particular ideology you subscribe to... Socialist? Anarchy? Anarcho-Capitalist? Communist?"
Asking why would people lend their money if they could not charge interest is like looking at a defenseless, skinny donkey tied up to a rickety old wagon and asking why would his big fat nasty owner feed him if he doesn't pull the wagon!
Thanks goes to Bill whose comment to credit ratings evoked in me a new mental picture of interest.
"I simply don't follow the logic behind your argument...How would a non-interest based economy work? If the banks are unwilling to asses interest charges, then where is the incentive to lend the money - through equity participation?
How long do you think it would take for the money supply to dry up if each lender had to take an equity stake in your car or home, for example. Their capital would be indefinitely tied up.
Where does the new liquidity come from? Obviously not you or me as what incentive would we have to put money in the bank if they are not paying us interest to do so.
Where do the risk averse investors turn? What about the elderly and retirees who feel comfortable with CD, money market and Treasury returns? The democratic platform against private social security accounts runs contrary to your very argument as they claim that equity participation is much too risky..."
Thanks, Bill, for your thoughtful comment.
Your concerns are valid. Circulation is the whole point of introducing currency into an economy.
"Where is the incentive to lend the money?" The only wholesome place it can be, from the profits of equity investing.
"How long...would [it] take for the money supply to dry up if each lender had to take an equity stake in your car or home... Their capital would be indefinitely tied up." By definition, capital is invariably "tied up" once it’s invested in an asset like a home or a car. The only thing interest accomplishes is it transfers an excess portion of the borrower's earned income (which is not "tied up") to the lender, and so on and so forth, to infinity.
And, what do you think the lender does with all the interest that's collected? Most of it the lender can't even spend! It is just too much money!!! So, he lends it to others and others, etc., etc...
Where does the new liquidity come from? Where it’s supposed to come from when there is an increase in a nation's productive capacity--the government press! That's why it's created. The government need only make sure it does not print too much, which is easier to do when there’s no interest than when you have to keep track of principal AND interest.
Where do the risk averse investors turn? I know it is difficult to imagine now because we live in an interest laden society. But, risk averse lenders will invest their money in the ways that are available to them, just as they do now. Only interest bearing loans won't be one of them. Margrit Kennedy presents some creative suggestions to give people incentive to circulate their cash.
Finally, of course equity participation is very risky!!! That which is taken must come from somewhere.
Interest based lending has evolved into a little to NO RISK activity. Simply, it is unnatural.
Risk is inherent in life. You cannot eliminate risk, you can only transfer it--from lenders to equity investors!
Restore the balance and equity investing will no longer be as risky as it is now.
Thanks a lot, Bill! I didn't think about it this way until you asked me!
Thank God for the internet, and thank God for people like you who are ready to talk!
Nothing is free.
What's in it for me?
Moneylenders that take title to cash-strapped customers' cars for short-term loans charge up to 300% APR and take advantage of weak state laws and loopholes.These guys take NO RISK.
"Title lenders typically target 'captive' borrowers who cannot afford a house or qualify for credit cards, but suddenly confront a cash crisis."No creativity or productivity required; pure exploitation.
"That's what happened to Sharon Jones. [She] paid $1,365 toward her $500 title loan [that's some ROI, with no risk!!!] because her disability check only covers interest payments."This is standard operating procedure for moneylenders who profit by charging interest.
"But title-loan industry executives testified that tougher laws will put them out of business and deny cash-strapped Georgians like Jones access to their lender of last resort."Typical, the old "without us, how will these needy people survive?" I have a novel idea: how's about the government terminates bankers' monopoly on our money supply and lends interest-free money directly to citizens? Then no one will need their magnamious services!
"'The military's an especially ripe target' because of the rank-and-file's relative youth, lack of financial sophistication and concern that money problems could cost them advancement..."What they fail to admit is that anyone who is vulnerable is a target. And all of us are one step removed from vulnerability.
"Lending money at what amounts to [350% APR] or more should not be tolerated: If the payday and car-title loan industry wants to maintain that such exorbitant rates are necessary to do business, it is business that is not worth doing,"
While these types of loans are particularly egregious because of their extremely high interest rates, even the most modest amounts of interest can transform borrowers into slaves.
Take a look at NYC's MTA. All its bonds are issued at around 4-5%APR and they pay over $1.2BILLION annually in interest on their bonds! So, much of our tolls, fares and taxes go to paying interest on outstanding bonds while we wait in the street for broken down transit!
When will enough be ENOUGH to end this madness?
FIRST, they give moneylenders an exclusive license to CONTROL our money supply, and suck up our wealth through that fictional instrument called INTEREST (i.e., mortgages, car loans, credit cards, etc.).
That's life. Big fish eat little fish.
Emma Dixon writes about the role institutionalized racism played in the unnecessary losses suffered by African Americans both during and after hurricane Katrina and there's much truth to what she says.
Representative John Murtha of Pennsylvania made this speech on October 17 to the Democratic caucus.
This story is essential reading.
I am no tech guru. So, when I do things on my site, I don't always anticipate the technical conseqeunces.
Daysman said...
We both envision a banking system that is not allowed to charge interest determined by the market. Your voice is strong for a non-interest, not-for-profit money system; reminiscent of the Teutonic knights money structure. It is very rigid but it does retain value, I would even say that there would be no need for Congress to set the value of a dollar, money would not deviate in value. Wages would be king in such a system but bankruptcies could be brutal; there was no credit in the Teutonic knights' money system, credit came about with the advent of commerce and the industrial age.
We are in complete agreement that imparting a monopoly on the currency was a bad idea. For America to write a bond... in essence America takes out a loan, hence the bank is loaning "bank money" to America... instead of America issuing her own Constitutional money is bizarre and fantastically corrupt. Not only do we owe interest on those bonds, we owe the principal. When America issues her own money the nation is enriched. When America instead borrows money from the Federal Reserve the nation is indebted. The IRS then collects that debt from every American household and deposits it in the Federal Reserve. The Federal Reserve is a banking scam, pure and simple.
I think you tend to roll together fractional banking, currency speculation, bond money, compound interest loans; both corporate and mortgages, and simple interest (yes there still are simple interest loans; auto financing is simple interest) in your mind and label the whole evil beast as "interest". Nothing incorrect in your view, but understand that my view is that we need to stop everything except the simple interest loans. Banks can function as simple savings and loans to the benefit of free society.
Either one of our views would require the hand of God to execute... I personally hold fast to the hope that Jesus will return in the near future and clean the stinking planet up. I can't imagine a grass roots effort acquiring the momentum needed to overthrow the elite ruling class that has held the world in it's grip for centuries. In today's world, those rulers are bankers.
Thanks, Daysman.
I understand your point. Simple interest is far better than all this crap. But, it is nearly impossible to turn the current tide. If we're going to go through all that trouble we must not settle for anything less than equal access FOR ALL to the benefits of our monetary system. That is not possible with interest.
And to your last point, God works through people.
Let's pray and work hard. God will do the rest.
I've heard a lot of good things about Paul Krugman that appear to be true. This is the first time I've read his perspective.
Les Visible could not have been more correct; what you see is not what you get.
Disney's not performing so well these days.
"Parks and Resorts profit rose 10 percent to $309 million, while the consumer products division profit fell 10 percent to $132 million."Let's see. Generally, it costs more to go to Disneyland than it does to buy your kid cheap 'made in China' Disney merchandise sold at the mall.
According to this AP report, "House Republicans sweated out a victory on a major budget cut bill in the wee hours Friday...[making] modest but politically painful cuts across an array of programs for the poor, students and farmers."
Posted by Jim Bradley to The Truth Will Set You Free at 11/17/2005 01:12:45 PM
A lender gets a return for deferring consumption as deferring consumption is a cost (it's painful to save). Since you propose giving lenders zero return, I submit the utopia you envision will not be possible without a massive exercise in state enforced lending with punitive fines, jail, etc. -- a reduction of liberty, not an expansion of it.
The exponential rise in debt is from the central bank holding interest rates artificially low and thus encouraging borrowing to offset inflation, while defending the banking system with a currency that can be expanded at will (and shifting risk to depositors with the depreciation of their savings). Since banks don't have much "savings" of their own, they bear little of the risk. That's an outcome of the structure, not of the illegitimacy of compound interest.
Further, compound interest and simple interest are the same ... i.e. one can be mathematically transformed into the other. For instance, 6% simple annual interest yields $60 from $1000 over one year. Monthly compounded interest of 5.841 because (1+.05841/12)^12=1.06 or 6% additional.
Clearly there are serious problems with these views. Join up, but be right.
It's apparent that we disagree on a fundamental issue.
You think there's nothing wrong with interest and I insist that it is at the heart of our economic woes.
At least we agree that the private monopoly by the Federal Reserve Bank is catastrophic.
Let's leave it at that, for now and see what other people believe.
qrswave - OK we can discuss that part. Please specify why it is wrong that a person (you as well) earn a positive return in exchange for the cost of deferring consumption.
Fred Bieling has this to say about credit ratings:
"I'm no economist, but what I want to know is how a person can have his credit rating lowered every time he or she shops around for something, cars, car insurance, anything in which credit is checked. I know what the answer is, it's been explained to me that shopping around raises a red flag with creditors.My reply:
That excuse is bullcrap. It's economic discrimination. If you have an 800 credit score, your pretty much going to get the lowest intrest rate possible. But if your in the 600's for whatever reason, your going to take a bigger hit if you even try more than two or three car dealerships to get an accurate idea of what your monthly payment is going to look like.
That is not fair. That's the problem I have with interest.
"That's a brilliant observation, Fred. It makes perfect sense now.In fairness, there are dissenters. Jim Bradley has a different take on interest.
The trouble starts when the government gives the banks exclusive access to the money, but then it gets terribly wrong because bankers take advantange of this monopoly by charging INTEREST.
So, the whole system expects you to pay in CASH; but in order to get some CASH, you have to pay more CASH, a.k.a, INTEREST!. You simply have no access to cash without interest!
So of course, once they see that you need some cash badly, i.e., you're shopping around and intend to borrow boatloads of money, they lower your credit rating so they can charge more interest!
You're right, Fred-- it'seconomic discrimination.
We want economic justice, for a change."
Twisting The American Dream is a great piece that takes a cautionary look at the propriety of turning a 16-year old girl into a professional golfer who can make her first million before she learns to drive a car.
No one can forget those now infamous words from our appointed head of state G.W. to Michael Brown, then head of FEMA, just after Hurricane Katrina ravaged Louisiana and Mississippi.
More evidence that demonstrates that my risk-based theory against interest is right on the mark.
"[F]oreign investors poured a record $101.9bn into US assets in September."That's because there's TOO MUCH RISK in EQUITY investing!!!
"$93.4bn of [these] inflows into bonds ... [while] $24.6bn [went] into US equities."
"the largest monthly net inflow [into equities] since February 2000, just ahead of the bursting of the stock market bubble."Now, this is just an educated guess, but something tells me that there is a causal relationship here. Keep your eye peeled for another stock market plunge in the near future.
This is extremely dangerous!
Posted by Daysman in response to Difference Between Lending-At-Interest And Risk-Based-Investing
Your Risk argument becomes crystal clear when you study mortgages. Mortgages have relatively no risk for the Lender because they are backed by the home. Yet, mortgages amortize future compound interest into the earliest payments and that results in 30 year mortgage payments that send over 90% of the payment to "interest"... which is like calling over 50% of our income "taxes".Thanks for your comment, Daysman! It's incredibly insightful and provides a lot of historical perspective.
I do think there is a fair "tax" and a fair "interest" which we owe; but over 50% of our income should not be taken for "taxes" and over 90% of our mortgage payments should not be stolen a la "interest".
The Boston tea party took place because colonists didn't want to pay the tea tax... tax meant 1%. In America today we are splitting our income with the government; it isn't taxes, it's too high to be compared to what the Godfather took from his victims in the old days, so it isn't protection either, it is partnership in crime; the government has drafted us all as partners to commit our lives to killing others and stealing their resources. "Tax" means 1%; these aren't taxes and these aren't dues, these are too big for that.
Of course the cause of the evil that rules the planet is fractional banking. Banks needed cash flow to service their loans and they got it from the slave trade, the opium trade, and from pirating on the open seas. Satan's minions used these to build mega-banks (read corporate) and seized power over whole nations.
They then set up central banks of issue for the nations and indebted the entire nation to the central banks. The central banks are owned by the corporate banks and use their power to change all the laws to let banks write loans that charge "interest" at astronomical levels.
Einstein was asked what the most powerful force in the Universe is and replied, "compound interest". Compound interest sucks the life out of a nation. Banks now own everything and the mechanisms that were put in place to take everything are impossible to turn off. Hence the mosquito will keep sucking blood until he blows up from too much blood.
Your patient is already dead. That's why he won't listen to what's wrong with him. Once the host dies the parasite is in trouble. Hence, all the problems at the FED.
Three cheers for What Really Happened!!!
Unemployment Rate Skyrockets among veterans returning from Iraq and Afghanistan.
“the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics says that for the first three quarters of 2005, nearly 15 percent of veterans aged 20-24 are jobless -- three times the national average.”That’s pretty high; though there are many inner city communities with similar statistics.
“[T]he high unemployment rate is ‘partly because most … seriously injured in [combat] are in the early stages of their military careers and possess limited transferable job skills or very little civilian work experience.’”In other words, these guys were poor and uneducated before they entered the armed forces and they remain that way upon surviving it.
"The tragedy of homelessness among veterans persists, even when the economy is robust and unemployment is low…"That’s because the monetary system is our biggest problem—not Iraq or Afghanistan! These young men fought the wrong war, for the wrong reasons.
"Homeless veterans require remedial education, job-search and counseling assistance, medical services and transitional housing in order to re-enter the labor market…"And, the only way for them to get it is by directing our human capital to put an end to our nation’s privately owned interest-based monetary system--a colossal siphoning machine that siphons the blood, sweat and tears of the working class and channels it in the form of CASH to idle moneylenders.
"If the Nation can issue a dollar bond it can issue a dollar bill. The element that makes the bond good makes the bill good also.Please, learn about how money is supposed to work; pass the truth on; and to the best of your ability, stop paying, borrowing, and accepting dollars.
The difference between the bond and the bill is that the bond lets the money broker collect twice the amount of the bond and an additional 20%. Whereas the currency, the honest sort provided by the Constitution pays nobody but those who contribute in some useful way.
It is absurd to say our Country can issue bonds and cannot issue currency. Both are promises to pay, but one fattens the usurer and the other helps the People."--Thomas Edison 1847-1931
I read an excerpt from a book called All Alone In The World: Children Of The Incarcerated.
No doubt, spreading the truth is essential to the struggle to rid ourselves of this horrendous monetary system.
"Most Americans have concluded that the Japanese are designing and building better cars.Now, I agree that the Big Three make lousy cars, and most definitely make just as lousy business decisions. But apparently, these BOZOS are darn good at lending!
The Big Three have been making money by loaning money, not building cars. We have our house and cars insured by GM.
One can no longer "Buy American." The choice is between a Japanese marque car made in America or an American marque made in Mexico."
Posted by: billwald November 14, 2005 at the Mises Economics Blog
At the risk of sounding alarmist, I direct your attention to the full text of what looks like the beginning of the end.
FOREIGN INVESTORS LOSE APPETITE FOR TREASURIES AS DEFICIT RISES Nov. 14 (Bloomberg)RED ALERT detailed translation necessary!!! Feds increase interest rates (a.k.a. YIELDS) to stimulate demand for treasury bonds, which in turn raises the government's borrowing costs (INTEREST PAID) on its debts! HOLY COW!!! they're accelerating our demise!!! It's like a dog chasing its own tail!!!
The U.S. government is growing more dependent on investors from abroad [mortgaging more of the nation to pay interest on our debts] just as their appetite for Treasury securities is waning [it's too risky].
Overseas investors… own half of all U.S. government debt [we work to enrich them], [and] bought 14 percent of …10-year notes auctioned this year… [we’re auctioned off to the highest bidder]
A drop in demand may extend the slump that pushed Treasury yields to the highest this year, raising the government's borrowing costs to finance a $319 billion deficit.
The U.S. will borrow a record $171 billion … to help pay for relief efforts after Hurricanes Katrina and Rita [following death and destruction, vultures circle for their share of the carcass]WHAT HORSECRAP!!! You CANNOT increase interest rates in an economy saddled with debt without causing INFLATION!!!
***
Investors ``are cautious about buying too aggressively right now with yields rising so quickly…'' ["let's wait until they're so desperate, they'll pay any percent interest we ask"]
***
The yield… moves inversely to the note's price [they pay less to screw us more] and is used to help determine corporate and consumer borrowing costs, [how desperate we’ll be to borrow more]
Foreign Participation ...
[A] larger group that includes U.S. institutional investors, foreign central banks and overseas investors, bought 34.9 percent of the debt sold…down from 47.4 percent …a year earlier. [half of the country belongs to them]
`
`Foreign buying … is waning,'' [collapse is imminent] … ``This would obviously put upward pressure on yields. [please buy! we’ll promise you their grandchildren]
The Treasury will always be able to finance the budget deficit. [printing is easy] The real question is at what cost.'' [how about their great, great, great grandchildren?]
***
`Haunting' Deficit
Overseas investors owned…half the … tradable Treasuries ... [the other half of the country belongs to them]
[F]oreign investors ...[keep] U.S. yields in check as the budget deficit ballooned to a record [height]...[if it weren’t for foreign vultures, domestic vultures would have devoured us by now]
"You can't build in these constant deficits without having them come back to haunt you…'' [we’re screwed]
Japan, the largest foreign owner of Treasuries, cut its holdings of the securities this year [by over $15 billion]… [cutting its losses]
***
`Better Places'
There's little incentive to invest in U.S. debt with inflation accelerating and the Fed forecast ...to keep raising rates into 2006... [when there are too many prostitutes, a prostitute must do more tricks to earn the same dollar]
***
"The Fed has really wanted to get ahead of inflation and stay ahead of it. You're going to see higher yields."
Quigley … said he prefers German government debt to Treasuries even with yields on U.S. 10-year notes exceeding bunds by about the most in six years. [the U.S. is overextended, it simply has nothing of value left to offer]MAJOR CONFLICT OF INTEREST:the more value we get for our hard earned money the less profitable it is for creditors to rape us—so the Fed increases interest rates to entice creditors to rape us!!!
***
`Good Value'
Treasury yields are the highest among the Group of Seven nations, which may help temper sales by foreign investors. [at these insane profits—let’s milk it for all its worth]
"Treasuries are pretty good value,'' [how can you resist profits at NO RISK?] …"I would recommend getting in at these levels.'' [it won’t last!]
***
Gains in the [value of the dollar] make it more expensive for foreign investors to finance their purchases of U.S. debt.
"Japanese accounts [are] shunning dollar assets," . . . "Foreign investors look at purchasing U.S. assets as two pieces: buying dollars and then buying the securities. If one of these pieces gets too rich, then the transaction becomes less attractive"HOLY COW!!! They’ll only buy our bonds and charge us interest if they can buy the dollars we need to pay the interest! It's like putting money in one pocket, then taking it out of two different pockets at a faster pace!