5 yrs later - hardly anyone believes the BIG lie
Five years after they pulled it off, hardly anyone in the world believes the ridiculous story about 19 hijackers with box-cutters and hundred-story buildings magically collapsing into their footsteps.
They miscalculated big time.
When they took the towers down, they never anticipated that this many people would question their version of reality and work so hard to demonstrate, unequivocally, that they lied. But, we did.
And to those who think that the truth was buried at ground zero, think again. It's only a matter of time.
Just as the towers collapsed into their footprints, so will the lie.
posted by qrswave @ Monday, September 11, 2006
7 Comments:
Hardly anyone except all the structural engineers in the world and 84% of the american public.
never mind SOT, vper
Like a dictator's information minister, it's his job to spew propaganda for his boss, right up until the minute that it's over.
"Hardly anyone except all the structural engineers in the world and 84% of the american public."
Truth is not dependant on popular vote
Wow, nice job Vper. Each of the four scholars you have listed have already been proven frauds over at screwloosechange.blogspot.com.
And the 5th guy was quoted completely out of context. Mathys Levy has never endorsed the controlled demo theory.
So here you all are, stuck just like before, without a single structural engineer who will endorse your nonsense.
Are you a structural engineer, revealer?
I have endured ABC broadcast channel the night of the 5th anniversary.
It is purely propagandistic. I laughed at some of the parts on the post-movie shows hosted by the familiar ABC News anchor figures who tell the Zionist-controlled-media-approved fairy tale lies of 'who' did the horror with such somber seriousness.
When the lies die down to ground into the powder of oblivion to blow away in the wind, the truth will emerge like a radiant ray of the bright sun that will make the black worms squirm to roast on the impenetrable sidewalk concrete after the raging thunderstorm.
SOT,
You wrote:
Wow, nice job Vper. Each of the four scholars you have listed have already been proven frauds over at screwloosechange.blogspot.com.
And what makes screwloosechange blogspot more reliable and trustworthy than this blogspot?? What makes the contributors of that blogspot more quotable and truthful than the ones here?? Just because they say what you want to read and believe, you hold them up in higher esteem than this blog and take their word as the truth and the contributions of people here a lie.
Please !!!
There are many many many more questions about the truth of 9/11 than just how the buildings came down so please lets not just stick to the "structural engineer" requirement. And anyway, like one of the contributors said here earlier, no structural engineer can prove who was behind the attacks, just how the buildings came down but that doesn't prove anything concretely about the identity of the perpetrators.
Post a Comment
<< Home