Popular Mechanics crank can't admit defeat
What a loser.
Rather than admit that he's wrong and we're right, the man who thinks he 'debunked' the Truth, with his empty commentary in Popular Mechanics last year, wails and whines about being compared to a Nazi.
Boo-hoo. Where's the beef? There is none.ON Feb. 7, 2005, I became a member of the Bush/ Halliburton/ Zionist/ CIA/ New World Order/ Illuminati conspiracy for world domination. That day, Popular Mechanics, the magazine I edit, hit newsstands with a story debunking 9/11 conspiracy theories. Within hours, the online community of 9/11 conspiracy buffs - which calls itself the "9/11 Truth Movement" - was aflame with wild fantasies about me, my staff and the article we had published. Conspiracy Web sites labeled Popular Mechanics a "CIA front organization" and compared us to Nazis and war criminals.
For a 104-year-old magazine about science, technology, home improvement and car maintenance, this was pretty extreme stuff.
Unable to admit that he was discredited because his piece lacked substance, he wants readers to believe that he was persecuted because he conducted 'research.' The man is in absolute denial and suffers from paranoid delusions. Instead of accepting the fact that 9/11 Truth theories are now mainstream, he insists we 'inflitrated the mainstream' as if through some voo-doo powers and not simply through logic and reason.
"Conspiracy theorists want to pick and choose which facts to believe," he cries. Yeah, so what? Judges do it all the time. Witnesses present evidence, the Judge decides which facts to believe and which to discard as incredible.
Then he has the nerve to characterize the mickey mouse evidence upon which the official version relies as 'a huge preponderance of evidence' and the glaring gaps that could fit a herd of elephants as 'a small handful of anomolies.' What a joke.
"But they're not true," he cries. And to prove it, he attacks two inconsequential quotes, which even if false, only discredit the quotes, not necessarily the underlying facts. More importantly, he doesn't come any where near the gaping holes and impossibilities in the official story that prove it's a LIE.These anomalies include the claim that the hole in the Pentagon was too small to have been made by a commercial jet (but just right for a cruise missile); that the Twin Towers were too robustly built to have been destroyed by the jet impacts and fires (so they must have been felled by explosives), and more. If true, these and similar assertions would cast serious doubt on the mainstream account of 9/11.
The American public has every right to ask hard questions about 9/11. And informed skepticism about government and media can be healthy. But skepticism needs to be based on facts, not fallacies. Unfortunately, for all too many, conspiratorial fantasies offer a seductive alternative to grappling with the hard realities of a post-9/11 world.I couldn't agree more - the most seductive (and absurd) of which is the conspiracy theory that 19 hijackers with box-cutters collapsed three colossal buildings into their footprints by hitting them with two planes.
Give it up, Meigs - like it or not, the Truth will prevail.
posted by qrswave @ Wednesday, September 13, 2006
6 Comments:
I have to disagree with you leslie, all Zionists are not Jewish - many are Evangelical Christians, or at least call themselves that.
The only thing you can say that all Zionists have in common is their racism, their brutality, and their lies.
And regarding what hit the pentagon - the more important question is 'who was behind it?'
honestly, all this is getting to confusing for me cause each side seems to have its truths and lies and each side seems to be right and wrong. and since the evidence is all gone (ofcourse we know thanks to whom it is all gone before ever being investigated) i think both sides will keep disproving the other about their theories and hypothesis. and since i myself am a lay person in physics, engineering and demolition sciences, i really don't know whose facts to believe. This in reference to only the fall of the WTC towers, nothing else. Though the fall (pull) of WTC 7 leaves no doubt in my mind about that building and how that was all planned so then why not the other 2 towers ??
anyway, thought you guys might enjoy the following link. it is a written version of the programme that was aired but I am sure if u google the programme name, u will get to see the video on youtube or google or somewhere on the net.
EXCLUSIVE...9/11 Debate: Loose Change Filmmakers vs. Popular Mechanics Editors of "Debunking 9/11 Myths"
AMY GOODMAN, Democracy Now!
http://www.uruknet.org.uk/?p=m26628&hd=0&size=1&l=e
'who was behind it?'
Since the Groundbreaking of the Pentagram was on 9/11/41, and the remodel of wedge 1 was completed on 9/11/01, and the Pentagram was rededicated on 9/11/02 I would say some sick fuck Masons did it!
Thanks MP,
I always appreciate your comments.
Interesting about how Zionists on both sides of the argument, trying to confuse one because believe me they are really succeeding as far as i am concerned ..... :)
Also, i like the questions you have put forward. I can see what motivated the attacks and i also see who benefits from them and it is definately not OBL or the muslims. I guess i was/am trying to look for something more concrete and substantial to show me who was really behind the attacks. But maybe I should just stick to the questions of motive and benefit because the other proof will never get clear for me.
the quoman,
I'd like to be excluded from any group of people you consider duped by that article. He copied an article from rense.com. Rense.com is totally invalid. It's a conspiracy site and nothing more. He has articles about aliens and UFOs. That alone completely invalidates his site. He has a story he wrote about a ridiculous tesla device that some nefarious organization uses to control the world. It's a story about BS. It's totally made up but it's there on his site to mislead people.
First people get a link to a 911 article, or read some article that is accredited to rense.com. Then they go to the main rense.com site and end up falling into a trap. Next thing you know weak minded people are talking about UFOs and 911 in the same conversation making even the benevolent side of the 911 movement look retarded. Then you get videos like this loose change "debate" on democracy now. The popular mechanics guys have to make sure and repeat that dylan is a conspiracy theorist and associating their actions with illogical "conspiracy theorists" and making absurd remarks like "in conspiracy there are no coincidences". Try telling this to the judge the next time you go to court: "in the court room, there are no coincidences".
Rense.com is not a place where you can get good information. It's a place to avoid so as to not be deceived. And it's a place hurting the truth.
For the record I don't support Loose Change or anyone involved in the production. All of the questionable people involved in the 911 movement are pushing Loose Change religiously and almost no other videos. Deborah Simon financed the video. Her family also financed Lee Hamilton from the 911 commission. She's connected to a lot of other totally corrupt people in this movement as well. Anyhow... don't read rense.com with your brain turned off.
In the above article recently pasted and sent to Rense, there is a quoted paragraph regarding the "magic passport theory", dating back to January 2, 2003 if not earlier.) The original reports held that this was Satam al-Suqami's passport; in later reports it was said to be Mohammed Atta's. It doesn't really matter, since the official theory alleges that both Suqami and Atta were on "Flight AA 11" which was claimed to have hit the North Tower from the north.
If the passport had somehow been ejected from the building and survived relatively unscathed, my analysis concluded that it should have ended up in Liberty Street to the south. Some reports claimed it was found "blocks away", but air resistance would have prevented it from clearing the buildings to the south of Liberty Street.
Vesey Street is the other oft-quoted site of the alleged passport discovery, e.g. as claimed by Wiki. Since the overpressure from the hydrocarbon deflagration would have been insufficient to decelerate the passport from hundreds of miles an hour in a southerly direction to tens of miles an hour in the opposite direction, it would indeed have been necessary for Suqami (or Atta) to have thrown his passport out of the window before they overflew Vesey Street. The scriptwriters had a fifty-fifty chance of correctly matching the hijacker's name with the street where it was supposed to have been found (for any one attempt). It is rather amusing that even after two goes, they blew it both times.
Regarding Jim Meigs and Popular Mechanics, I have corroborating evidence that they are part of a political operation to cover up Zionist crimes. On 6 September 2006 there was a hit on my website from an I.P. address which checks back to Hearst Magazines, New York, the Popular Mechanics publisher. They did a Google search for bollyn + sam + danner, and got on to one of my pages which comes at about tenth position. (That page points out that Sam admitted his story about "witnessing a Global Hawk hitting the Pentagon" was not entirely true - particularly the part about witnessing the object that hit the Pentagon! I have written a more recent page on how Eric Hufschmid, whose half-sister married Rupert Murdoch's son, is a COINTELPRO agent working to split the 911 truth movement. One of his recent tasks was to try to prise Christopher Bollyn away from American Free Press.)
So the next day, Jim Meigs went on the Frank Whalen show to "debunk the conspiracy theorists".
Hence, Popular Mechanics - with its 25-year-old online editor and "senior" researcher Benjamin Chertoff who is the cousin of Michael Chertoff - exhibits this clear tendency not to focus on the science as might be expected for such a magazine. Rather, the staff are actively looking for straw men like the Danner hoax that can easily be debunked.
Post a Comment
<< Home