< HOME  Tuesday, February 07, 2006

SNOW must GO

The man's neural receptors are terminally unresponsive to external human stimuli, responding exclusively to corporate demands and his own selfish greed.
"A lot of good can come from a smart federal budget, and a considerable amount of harm can come from a bad one."
A SMART budget being one where Americans are ravaged by moneylenders, and a BAD one being where we're left to prosper from our labor, unexploited by moneylenders.
"Let's use the FY 2007 budget to make good policy - restrained as the circumstances dictate on spending but aggressive on the expansion of opportunity," Snow said in testimony prepared for delivery to the Senate Finance Committee.
"Aggressive on the expansion of opportunity" meaning open season on America's working class.
"Lower tax rates are good for the economy and a growing economy is good for Treasury receipts," he said.
What economy is he talking about? He and his cohorts finished it off, a long time ago.

SNOW must GO, along with his boss and the corporations that have hijacked our nation.


At Wednesday, February 08, 2006, Anonymous Apollonian said...

Okay yes qrswave, but how exactly do we make them go? Well, things gotta get worse, I fear, so more weaklings (like so many of the "elders" of the "greatest generation") die out and out of our way, heretofore being in our (revolutionary) way, helping to uphold the system. So we see again, things are cyclic and deterministic: the forest fire must very much burn itself out before we have serious opportunity for revolutionary success. But we keep our eyes open, u know.

So meantime, we keep blogging and informing our volk, emphasizing New Testament (NT) Conspiracy theory-analytic-template, identifying the crimimal perpetrators and masterminds, the Judeo-"Sadduceans" (the latter being such as Falwell, Robertson, Limbaugh, O'Reilly, et al.)

Okay then, as far as practical things to be done in way of details, well, as I've noted, we need to revert to election of US Senators by state legislatures, voting with paper-trails, etc.

The practical goal is to abolish the Federal Reserve Bank (Fed) counterfeiting scam, the crux strength of these Judeo-"Sadducean" conspirators, by which they perpetrate literally everything else.

Honest elections and death to the Fed. Apollonian

At Wednesday, February 08, 2006, Blogger qrswave said...

I don't care what their religious makeup is, but I agree with you 100 percent that "The practical goal is to abolish the Federal Reserve Bank (Fed) counterfeiting scam, the crux strength of these [conspirators,] by which they perpetrate literally everything else."

You are unequivocally right about this, though you may be wrong about other things (e.g., interest).

At Thursday, February 09, 2006, Anonymous Apollonian said...

There u go again, making an empty assertion as about interest--without any substantiation whatever: this seems to be the extent of ur mentality and capacity therewith, qrswave. U don't demonstrate that u know anything about the subject in the first place, not to mention ur antipathy for it, why it's bad. It doesn't seem to occur to u that u make no sense.

U really demostrate no logic; u seem to be mere total mystic invoking some inane "morality."

About the only good u really do is to run ur blog without too much censorship though u often screech hysterically like the proverbial fishwife about moralism, etc. As far as real information, u urself not only have none, u wouldn't even know it if u came upon it by chance.

U really are a mystic; I don't know why u invoke logic, as u obviously really know nothing about it. A.

At Thursday, February 09, 2006, Blogger qrswave said...

my assertions about interest are not empty. You just don't follow my logic. Others do.

My arguments against interest (based on math and policy) are presented in detail in the following posts, among others.

"Difference Between Lending at Interest and Equity Investing"

"Exactly How Does a Loan 'Bear' Interest?"

See also, my comment at "The MOTHER of all MYTHS"

You know damn well that I've fully presented my arguments. You have not rebutted any of my points with anything other than unsubstantiated cheap shots.

Stop wasting time.

At Thursday, February 09, 2006, Anonymous Apollonian said...

Okay, I'll try this again. And observe I'm trying to be reasonable here. Note when someone starts getting mad and irate ("you know damn well that I've fully presented my arguments.") it often means he/she really doesn't have a substantial argument--u're just trying to emotionally intimidate poor folk like me, eh?

Well, I ck'd all the blogs u noted above. In "Mother of all Myths" u definitively failed; perhaps u didn't see my last post.

The other two references I looked at, but couldn't really find any cogent argumentation--but maybe I missed it, so could u pls restate in as few words as possible? (U present a great mass of words most of it meant to "illustrate" ur points, evidently--but I'm looking for a succinct, matter-of-fact, to-the-point argument, okay?)

I DO UNDERSTAND that if all money is debt money like present Fed Reserve Notes, yes obviously it's mathematically impossible to pay interest. But I believe G.Edward Griffin makes the point that there's nothing wrong with interest upon genuine commodity money--and if there is, u don't demonstrate. But perhaps that's not what u're talking about.

Note in exposition it's not good enough for just u to know what u're talking about--u gotta make it so others can understand too. And pls leave off with all the "illustrations," examples, and babbling; just give the bare argument.

Like I say, in "Mother of all Myths" u flatly failed without a doubt. Remember if what u're trying to say is really true, then u ought to be able to put it fairly simply--SO FAR U HAVE FAILED (aside, as I note above, fm the obvious fallacy of Fed Reserve Notes--but I already knew that).

Don't get emotional; just state the argument in simplest form. Apollonian

At Thursday, February 09, 2006, Blogger qrswave said...

Please, plainly and succintly explain how I "flatly failed without a doubt" in MOTHER of all MYTHS, as you so confidently assert without demonstrating.

Otherwise, I will be forced to assume that you are deliberately wasting my time and subversively trying to discredit my position by repeating your unsubstantiated attacks ad nauseum, like you accuse others of doing.

At Thursday, February 09, 2006, Anonymous Apollonian said...

Well, u illustrate the problem in ur last post: IT'S U WHO IS OBLIGATED TO MAKE THE CASE. U evidently have no argument aside fm ur bald, bare assertions against interest.

Again, if u have an argument, MAKE IT ALREADY, quit being stupid. Apollonian


Post a Comment

<< Home